Snake Toxicity

Earn CME/CE in your profession:

Continuing Education Activity

Venomous snakes inflict considerable morbidity and mortality worldwide, although specific data on the total number of venomous snakebites globally are lacking. In the United States, approximately 7,000 to 8,000 venomous snakebites occur each year, with about 5 to 10 deaths per year. Worldwide, the morbidity and mortality of snake bites are far greater. Despite this, very limited time is spent in traditional medical curricula on the diagnosis and treatment of snake bites. This CME activity seeks to fill that gap and review the role of the interprofessional team in this condition.


  • Review the risk factors for snakebite and snake toxicity.
  • Identify initial evaluation in the pre-hospital setting of snake bites.
  • Describe various treatments available for snakebites, including antivenom.
  • Outline prevention measures necessary to decrease snakebites.


Venomous snakes inflict considerable morbidity and mortality worldwide, although specific data on the total number of venomous snakebites globally are lacking. In the United States, approximately 7,000 to 8,000 venomous snakebites occur each year, with about 5 to 10 deaths reported per year, although there is no mandated reporting for snakebites, so these data are likely incomplete. Notably, bees are responsible for significantly more deaths than snakes in the United States.[1][2]

Patients with venomous snakebites present with signs and symptoms that can include superficial puncture wounds, localized pain and swelling, nausea, vomiting, muscle cramping, dizziness, numbness, tingling around the mouth, dyspnea, life-threatening coagulopathy, and shock. Pre-hospital treatments, including the application of ice, alcohol consumption, and wound incisions and oral suction of venom, are not recommended. Evidence supports initial conservative management, such as immobilization. In North America, the use of lymphatic constriction bands is not advised as these are reserved for venoms with significant neurotoxic effects only. Otherwise calming the patient and encouraging oral fluid intake prior to rapid evacuation to an emergency center where definitive care can be rendered. Initial assessment of the patient with a snakebite should include laboratory studies to evaluate for hematologic, neurologic, renal, and cardiovascular derangements. Antivenom is the definitive treatment, although the specific type of antivenom depends on the snake species. The previously used horse-serum derived full immunoglobulin antivenom has now largely been replaced by sheep-derived Fab antivenom (FabAV or Fab) and a recently safer horse-derived F(ab)2.[1][2][3]


Venomous snakebites generally occur when venomous snakes (most commonly pit vipers) are cornered or startled by humans. Increased interest in warm weather outdoor activities like hiking, backpacking, and fishing, as well as the increasing numbers of venomous snakes being kept as pets, has increased the number of venomous snakebites in recent decades. Many snakebites do not result in envenomation, although it is initially quite difficult to distinguish between an envenomated and non-envenomated bite.


There are about 3,000 species of snakes worldwide; 10% to 15% of them are venomous. Snakes primarily use their venom to obtain food.

In the United States, greater than 95 percent of snakebites are caused by the Crotalidae ("pit viper") family of snakes, so named because of heat-sensitive "pits" between the eyes and the nostrils used to sense their prey. The Crotalidae family includes the following snakes:

  • Rattlesnakes, genera Crotalus and Sistrurus 
  • Copperheads, Agkistrodon contortrix
  • Cottonmouths, or water moccasins, Agkistrodon piscivorous

The Elapidae or coral snakes (Micrurus species) account for a much smaller proportion of snakebites in the United States.  Elapids are found along the southern edge of the United States, whereas pit vipers are dispersed throughout most of the continent.  Rattlesnakes account for most snakebite-related deaths in people and domestic animals in the USA. Most coral snake bites in the United States occur in southern states, with Florida, Texas, North Carolina, and Georgia among the most common. Risk factors for snake bites include male sex, handling or disturbing a snake, and owning a venomous snake.[1][2][3]


Venomous snakes in the United States were previously classified as having either hemotoxic or neurotoxic venom, although more recent toxicology research suggests this binary classification is inadequate.[4] The venom contains proteins, phospholipases, enzymes that can cause necrosis and hemolysis via mechanisms that are still under study.[5] A concomitant allergic response leading to the release of histamine and bradykinin may also contribute to the systemic effects seen in more severe envenomations. Hypotension after a snakebite is likely caused by a variety of mechanisms, including increased permeability of capillaries, leading to extravasation of plasma and direct effects of toxins on the cardiac muscle, smooth muscle, and other tissues.[4]

History and Physical

A focused history and physical should be performed, starting with a primary survey of the patient's airway, breathing, and circulation. Shock and respiratory failure are common sequelae of snakebites, so close observation is crucial. Establishing the time of the bite as well as any previous interventions and asking about existing medical problems (e.g., cardiac, pulmonary, and renal disease), current symptoms, allergies, and last tetanus immunization are also important. Close examination and documentation of the patient's injuries are crucial, as worsening erythema, swelling, or blistering around the snakebite site could precede clinical deterioration. Although not advised, if the patient was able to take a sufficient quality photograph or physically capture the snake, identification of the species could be useful in guiding management. Time should not be wasted trying to find, photograph, or kill the snake. Bedside ultrasound of the bite location can be utilized to evaluate the depth and extent of associated skin and soft tissue involvement.[3]


Initial evaluation of suspected or confirmed venomous snakebite patients should include the following:

  • Routine vital signs
  • Electrocardiogram (ECG) and continuous cardiac monitoring
  • Complete blood count (CBC)
  • Urinalysis (UA)
  • Prothrombin time (PT)
  • Partial thromboplastin time (PTT)
  • Fibrinogen
  • Complete metabolic panel (including blood urea nitrogen and creatinine) 
  • Blood type and cross-matched for 2-4 units of packed red blood cells [3]

Treatment / Management

The initial management of suspected or confirmed venomous snakebite patients is divided into pre-hospital and emergency department care.

Pre-hospital Setting

  • Ensuring the patient is in a safe, comfortable place (away from the snake)
  • Calming and reassure the patient
  • Immobilization of the affected extremity with a sling if possible
  • Cleansing the wound
  • Monitoring for swelling or skin changes surrounding the wound
  • Oral hydration with clear fluids if the patient is able to tolerate them
  • Identification of the snake only if it does not put the patient or others at risk of further injury
  • Rapidly evacuation of the patient to an emergency center

Do not incise the wound or attempt to suck the venom out by mouth or with commercial suction devices. Avoid applying ice to the wound or giving the patient alcoholic beverages. 

Emergency Department

  • Placement of two large-bore intravenous catheters
  • Initiation of intravenous fluid (lactated Ringer's solution or normal saline)
  • Rapid determination of the severity of envenomation and whether to give antivenom
  • Cleaning of the snakebite wound
  • Consideration of surgical consultation if compartment syndrome unresponsive to antivenom is suspected
  • Monitor minimal or moderate envenomation patients for at least 12 to 24 hours
  • Tetanus immunization as indicated

Envenomation severity is classified into five grades (0 to IV), with grade IV being very severe envenomation characterized by rapidly progressing swelling, bleb formation, and necrosis as well as systemic symptoms including weakness, nausea, vomiting, muscle cramping, and convulsions. Minimal envenomation (grade 0) is characterized by fang wounds without other signs of envenomation and less than one inch of surrounding erythema, without systemic signs or symptoms of envenomation. Current treatment recommendations for crotalid (pit viper) envenomation is to use antivenom for progressive swelling, moderate envenomation, or laboratory findings or coagulopathy. Dosing is largely based on the severity of symptoms at initial presentation and response to treatment. Treatment of moderate envenomation should start with at least four vials.

Minimal envenomation does not require treatment with antivenom, but these patients should be monitored for a minimum of 12 hours.[3][6][7]A patient with minimal signs of envenomation should have a repeat coagulation panel performed to evaluate for delayed coagulopathy before discharge. Patients with progressive swelling, moderate envenomation, or coagulopathy should be given antivenom.

In North American there are two Crotalidae Antivenoms approved for use:

Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab Dosing

Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab is derived from 4 snake species (Western Diamondback, Eastern Diamondback, Mojave rattlesnake, and Cottonmouth) and immunized into sheep (ovine-derived). The whole immunoglobin is extracted, affinity purified, and cleaved by papain into the terminal Fab fragment of the immunoglobin. This reduces its size by about 1/3 and allows tissue penetration. However, it is cleared renally, and repeat dosing is usually necessary.

The initial controlling dose consists of 4-6 vials mixed in 250 mL normal saline (NS) administered over one hour (same number of vials for children). Initiate treatment at a rate of 10 mL/hr observing for adverse effects. If none, then increase every few minutes to achieve complete administration in one hour. Observe patients for local swelling and systemic symptoms. If there are signs of progression, then repeat with 4-6 vials over one hour.  Do not administer to try to completely normalize abnormal coagulation markers. Repeat until initial control is achieved (local swelling improves or stops, resolution of systemic signs, and resolution of clinically relevant bleeding). After achieving control, maintenance doses of 2 vials every 6 hours for 18 hours are recommended for rattlesnakes, patients with coagulopathy, and those with severe clinical envenomations. This is not usually required for moderate copperhead envenomations. However, if only a controlling dose is used, close and repeated monitoring for progression is important to decide if any additional doses are required. Remember that if recurrent swelling or coagulopathy occurs during maintenance doses, repeat the initial bolus protocol.

Repeat coagulation panel (PT/PTT/INR), fibrinogen, platelets, and hemoglobin on days 2-3 and days 5-7. Recurrent coagulopathy without clinically significant bleeding has been known to occur. Some repeat and follow parameters to normalization. Indications for repeat dosing if coagulopathy occurs between 3 and 7 days after the last dose of Crofab are:

  • INR > 3.0
  • PTT > 50 seconds
  • Platelet Count < 25,000
  • Fibrinogen < 50 ug/ml
  • Multi-component coagulopathy

Crotalidae Immune F(ab)2 Dosing

Crotalidae Immune F(ab)2 is derived from 2 snakes species (Bothris asper and Crotalus duressis) and immunized in horses (equine-derived).  The whole immunoglobin is extracted, purified, and cleaved by pepsin digestion into a fragment with 2 binding sites for venom components - F(ab)2.  Despite being derived from horses it is less immunogenic than the original rattlesnake antivenom produced. It is larger in size than Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab and persists in the serum longer with a more sustained duration of the activity, therefore usually not requiring repeat maintenance dosing.

The initial controlling dose consists of 10 vials mixed in 250 mL normal saline (NS) administered over one hour (same number of vials for children). The initial infusion rate for the first 10 minutes should start at 25 to 50 ml/hr, then if no adverse reaction occurs the remained of the 250 ml solution can be given over 1 hour.[8]

It is best to evaluate the number fo each of the antivenoms available and not mix loading and maintenance doses between the two products.

In rare severe envenomations, a repeat dose of 10 vials of Anavip may be needed.

Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab is contraindicated in a patient with a known allergy to sheep protein, in which case Crotalidae Immune F(ab)2 can be administered.

Crotalidae Immune F(ab)2 is contraindicated with a known allergy to horse protein, in which case Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab should be used.

Differential Diagnosis

Although venomous snakebites are usually fairly straightforward to diagnose, the differential diagnosis includes:

  • Snakebites from non-venomous snakes
  • Spider bites
  • Tick bites
  • Scorpion bites
  • Hymenoptera stings
  • Soft-tissue infections (folliculitis, furuncle, etc)


If treated promptly, the prognosis of most venomous snakebites in the United States is quite good. It is estimated that 25 percent of snakebites from venomous snakes do not result in envenomation.[3] Moreover, several thousand venomous snakebites each year in this country, there are usually less than 10 reported deaths. Deaths that do occur are generally in those who delay or avoid treatment.


Complications of venomous snakebite include: 

  • Coagulopathy
  • Shock
  • Respiratory failure
  • Acute renal failure
  • Local skin infection
  • Compartment syndrome
  • Serum sickness


A regional Poison Center will have knowledge of snakes in their service area, the availability of antivenom at nearby hospitals, and can provide a medical toxicologist for consultation by phone.

Deterrence and Patient Education

Prevention of venomous snakebites mostly centers on taking precautions to avoid snakes in the wild and not owning or handling venomous snakes at home.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends wearing long pants and boots when working or walking outdoors in known snake habitat and wearing leather gloves when handling brush or reaching into areas where snakes may be. Leather chaps or snake gaiters are also popular options for protecting against snakebites. The CDC also recommends not handling any venomous snake. Patients who do own venomous snakes should take extra precautions when handling them and use secure enclosures to ensure they do not escape.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Preventing snakebites and improving snakebite management requires collaboration among a variety of healthcare providers, including emergency medical service (EMS) personnel, rural hospitals and emergency departments, medical toxicologist, research institutions, and antivenom researchers and manufacturers. A recent article highlighted these challenges in the setting of South Asia.[9]



Prasanna Tadi


9/19/2022 11:56:48 AM



Warrell DA, Venomous Bites, Stings, and Poisoning: An Update. Infectious disease clinics of North America. 2019 Mar;     [PubMed PMID: 30712761]


Bawaskar HS,Bawaskar PH, Snakebite envenoming. Lancet (London, England). 2019 Jan 12;     [PubMed PMID: 30638580]


Juckett G,Hancox JG, Venomous snakebites in the United States: management review and update. American family physician. 2002 Apr 1;     [PubMed PMID: 11996419]


Warrell DA, Snake bite. Lancet (London, England). 2010 Jan 2;     [PubMed PMID: 20109866]


Williams HF,Mellows BA,Mitchell R,Sfyri P,Layfield HJ,Salamah M,Vaiyapuri R,Collins-Hooper H,Bicknell AB,Matsakas A,Patel K,Vaiyapuri S, Mechanisms underpinning the permanent muscle damage induced by snake venom metalloprotease. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2019 Jan;     [PubMed PMID: 30695027]


Harding SA, Calculated decisions: Antivenom dosing algorithm Emergency medicine practice. 2018 Sep 1;     [PubMed PMID: 30179411]


Lavonas EJ,Ruha AM,Banner W,Bebarta V,Bernstein JN,Bush SP,Kerns WP 2nd,Richardson WH,Seifert SA,Tanen DA,Curry SC,Dart RC, Unified treatment algorithm for the management of crotaline snakebite in the United States: results of an evidence-informed consensus workshop. BMC emergency medicine. 2011 Feb 3;     [PubMed PMID: 21291549]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Mascarenas DN,Fullerton L,Smolinske SC,Warrick BJ,Seifert SA, Comparison of F(ab'){sub}2{/sub} and Fab antivenoms in rattlesnake envenomation: First year's post-marketing experience with F(ab'){sub}2{/sub} in New Mexico. Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology. 2020 Aug 5     [PubMed PMID: 32763251]


Ralph R,Sharma SK,Faiz MA,Ribeiro I,Rijal S,Chappuis F,Kuch U, The timing is right to end snakebite deaths in South Asia. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2019 Jan 22;     [PubMed PMID: 30670457]