Indications
Methocarbamol is classified as a centrally-acting skeletal muscle relaxant (SMR) that is United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for managing acute musculoskeletal pain. Methocarbamol has been FDA-approved for muscle spasms since 1957.[1] The clinical efficacy of methocarbamol is established within the larger class of muscle relaxants.[2] Methocarbamol is an anti-spasmodic agent used to treat involuntary skeletal muscle spasms, differentiating it from anti-spastic agents like dantrolene and baclofen, which are specifically designed to address spasticity resulting from upper motor neuron disorders. Other commonly prescribed anti-spasmodic agents include carisoprodol and cyclobenzaprine. Additionally, diazepam and tizanidine have anti-spastic and anti-spasmodic properties.[3] These anti-spasmodic and anti-spastic medications have distinct mechanisms of action. However, this discussion will concentrate on methocarbamol for the scope of this review.
Methocarbamol was discovered in the early 1950s and received regulatory approval in 1957.[1] In 1958, O'Doherty and Shields reported that methocarbamol effectively treats muscle spasms in patients with pyramidal spine lesions, such as herniated intervertebral discs.[4] Concurrent with the research of O'Doherty and Shields, Forsyth demonstrated methocarbamol's efficacy in a case series of 100 patients with orthopedic conditions, including post-operative muscle spasm acute and chronic disc herniation. In the published study, all but 6 patients experienced either a "moderate" or "pronounced" relief in subjective pain or spasms. No significant adverse effects were observed, and only 9 patients reported "minor" adverse effects, including dizziness and nausea.[5] Despite its common use today, few high-quality studies and no meta-analyses compare methocarbamol to placebo or alternative agents for muscle spasms.[6]
FDA-Approved Indications
Today, the clinical use of methocarbamol is typically confined to the adjunctive treatment of acute pain of musculoskeletal origin. According to the American College of Physicians guidelines, nonpharmacologic therapies for acute or subacute low back pain should be prioritized. If pharmacologic treatment is desired, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and skeletal muscle relaxants like methocarbamol are also available.[7]
Off-Label Uses
Off-label use of methocarbamol has been investigated for a range of painful disorders, including acute and chronic non-specific low-back pain, inflammatory arthritis, fibromyalgia, rib fractures, myofascial pain, abdominal muscle cramps in patients with cirrhosis and perioperative care of hip and knee replacements.[8][9][10][11][12] Benzodiazepines have replaced methocarbamol for tetanus treatment.[13] Methocarbamol is ineffective for treating contracture, rigidity, or spasticity, which is believed to originate from upper motor neuron injury. A recent case report has described the potential use of methocarbamol for tizanidine withdrawal.[14]
Mechanism of Action
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
- Search engine and full access to all medical articles
- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Mechanism of Action
The precise mechanism of action of methocarbamol remains unknown. In theory, involuntary muscle spasms may result from a protective reflex preventing movement that would otherwise cause injury. However, in some cases, muscle spasms themselves may become painful and debilitating. This phenomenon, known as the "pain-spasm-pain cycle," has not been confirmed in rigorous clinical and electrophysiologic studies.[9] Along with other muscle relaxants, the discovery and development of methocarbamol were based on animal studies that observed decreased muscle tone without concurrent depression of motor activity.[15] Theoretically, the relief skeletal muscle relaxants (SMR) provide results from global central nervous system depression. The other proposed mechanism is anticholinergic inhibition of the midbrain reticular activating system, which results in depressed polysynaptic reflexes and reduced muscle tone. This is also characterized as an indirect inhibition of the interneuronal junction of the spinal cord. Methocarbamol does not directly affect the skeletal muscle contractility, motor nerve fiber, or motor end plate.[4]
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption: The onset of action of oral methocarbamol is 30 minutes. Methocarbamol is well absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract and attains peak plasma concentrations at 2 hours.[16]
Distribution: Methocarbamol demonstrates moderate binding to plasma proteins, typically ranging from 46% to 50%.
Metabolism: Methocarbamol undergoes metabolic processes predominantly via dealkylation and hydroxylation pathways, potentially followed by conjugation.
Elimination: In healthy volunteers, methocarbamol exhibits plasma clearance rates ranging from 0.20 to 0.80 L/h/kg and an average plasma elimination half-life spanning 1 to 2 hours. Methocarbamol is primarily excreted as an inactive metabolite in the urine. Methocarbamol is typically dosed every 6 hours based on observed clinical pharmacokinetics. One study of methocarbamol in hemodialysis patients demonstrated no alteration in elimination time compared to control patients; however, renal clearance was reduced.[17] Clearance is also reduced in patients with cirrhosis; however, no specific dose adjustment is suggested. In one study, a dosage of 500 mg given twice daily was well tolerated by patients with cirrhosis.[12]
Administration
Available Dosage Forms and Strengths
Methocarbamol is commonly administered via the oral route. Methocarbamol is commercially available in 500 mg and 750 mg tablets. Intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) formulations may also be used commonly in the post-operative setting.
Adult Dosage
The daily recommended dosing ranges from 4 to 6 grams orally in divided doses every 6 hours. The maximum recommended dosage is 6 grams daily, and up to 8 grams daily have been utilized. However, lower doses are more common in clinical practice. For example, in a retrospective cohort study, the typical dose of methocarbamol for a hospitalized patient was 500 mg orally every 8 hours.[10] Intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) formulations may also be used commonly in the post-operative setting. One gram can be injected every 8 hours by IM or IV route. The dosage should not exceed 3 grams daily, and methocarbamol should not be used for more than 3 consecutive days.[18][19]
Specific Patient Population
Renal impairment: All major metabolites of methocarbamol are excreted in the urine. Similarly, small amounts of unchanged methocarbamol are excreted in the urine. The intravenous formulation of methocarbamol is contraindicated in renal impairment due to the presence of polyethylene glycol excipient. The oral methocarbamol should be cautiously used for patients with mild to moderate renal impairment. Healthcare providers should be cautious when giving methocarbamol to patients who are undergoing dialysis.[17]
Hepatic impairment: Methocarbamol is metabolized via liver dealkylation, hydroxylation, and conjugation. However, manufacturer labels do not provide dose recommendations.
Pregnancy considerations: Methocarbamol is considered a pregnancy category C medicine. Case reports have documented fetal and congenital abnormalities in pregnant women exposed to methocarbamol. As a result, this medication should not be used by women who are pregnant or may become pregnant, especially in the early stages of pregnancy, unless the potential benefits significantly outweigh the risks.[20]
Breastfeeding considerations: No studies have been conducted to evaluate methocarbamol use in breastfeeding women. The manufacturer recommends using caution when administering methocarbamol to a nursing woman. Methocarbamol is known to cross the placental barrier and is excreted in breast milk, according to animal studies. Therefore, it is not recommended for use in women who may become pregnant or who are breastfeeding.
Pediatric patients: The efficacy and safety of methocarbamol in patients younger than 16 have not been established.
Older patients: SMRs, including methocarbamol, are included in the Beers Criteria as medications that should be avoided in adults older than 65. They have been associated with a small but statistically significant increase in injury for older patients. This theoretical "injury" is based on retrospective case-control analyses evaluating patients who present to urgent care facilities, emergency rooms, and hospitals. The primary diagnoses of concern include falls, non-vertebral fractures, soft-tissue injuries, and other cognitive or psycho-motor disruptions. The absolute risk increase from methocarbamol calculated from the extant data is approximately 0.2%. All SMRs share anticholinergic properties that may contribute to sedation, falls, confusion, and polypharmacy in older patients, and methocarbamol is no exception.[21][22]
Adverse Effects
Severe adverse effects noted in the methocarbamol package insert include seizures, leukopenia, and cholestatic jaundice. According to the LiverTox resource governed by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), methocarbamol has not been linked to liver or kidney injury.[1] According to drug monographs, there have been reports of seizures in patients with a history of epilepsy after IV administration and cases of polysubstance toxicity. The product labeling indicates that neurologic adverse drug reactions are more common, with sedation being the most prevalent, followed by dizziness and headache. Other reported neurologic adverse drug reactions include confusion, amnesia, falls, syncope, and diplopia. Gastrointestinal adverse effects include dyspepsia, nausea, emesis, metallic taste, and cholestatic jaundice. IV administration of methocarbamol has been associated with thrombophlebitis and injection site pain related to the extravasation of hypertonic solution. Methocarbamol may cause urine discoloration, but this is not clinically significant.[23]
Drug-Drug Interactions
There have been multiple studies assessing the abuse potential of methocarbamol. Animal studies have demonstrated low abuse potential when methocarbamol is compared to barbiturates and benzodiazepines.[24] However, multiple human studies have reported abuse potential.[25][26] Despite abuse concerns, a recent review of German pharmacovigilance data did not indicate abuse potential for methocarbamol. However, the authors noted that under-reporting of adverse effects was a limitation of the study, so the concern for abuse should remain. Exercise caution when prescribing methocarbamol to patients who are also prescribed multiple central nervous system depressants, such as opioids and benzodiazepines, or who have known substance use disorders.[27]
Contraindications
According to the FDA, methocarbamol is contraindicated in patients with a history of drug hypersensitivity to methocarbamol or excipient. In addition, IV-administered methocarbamol is contraindicated in renal impairment due to the presence of excipient polyethylene glycol, which is independently associated with metabolic acidosis, renal injury, and hyperosmolarity.[28] There have been multiple studies assessing the abuse potential of methocarbamol. Animal studies have demonstrated low abuse potential when methocarbamol is compared to benzodiazepines and barbiturates.[24] However, considerable human studies have reported abuse potential.[25][26] Despite abuse concerns, a recent review of German pharmacovigilance data did not indicate abuse potential for methocarbamol; however, the authors noted that under-reporting of adverse effects was a limitation of the study, so the concern for abuse should remain. Methocarbamol should be used with caution on multiple central nervous system (CNS) depressants, including benzodiazepines, opioids, and known substance use disorders.
Warning and Precautions
Myasthenia gravis: Methocarbamol should not be prescribed in patients with myasthenia gravis who are taking acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. This recommendation is in the package insert and based on a case report of an exacerbation of muscle weakness and fatigue associated with methocarbamol's anticholinergic effects.[29]
Beers criteria: As stated earlier, methocarbamol is included in the Beers Criteria and should be avoided in the geriatric population due to the risk of falls, fractures, soft-tissue injuries, and other cognitive or psychomotor impairments.[21]
Drug-laboratory interference: Methocarbamol can interfere with urine screening of vanillyl mandelic acid (VMA) and 5-hydroxy indole acetic acid (5-HIAA).[30]
Monitoring
Recommended monitoring of methocarbamol involves evaluating the clinical response and mitigating the risk of the emergence of adverse effects. There is no requirement to check blood chemistry in follow-up or therapeutic drug monitoring. Specific populations at risk for toxicity include cirrhosis, use of multiple CNS depressants, renal impairment, substance use disorders, and older patients.[22]
Toxicity
Signs and Symptoms of Overdose
Isolated methocarbamol overdose is rare and unlikely to be life-threatening in the absence of multiple drug exposures.[31] Based on limited data, toxicity symptoms may include nausea, sedation, seizures, coma, and death.
Management of Overdose
There is no antidote for methocarbamol overdose. Treatment is supportive. One retrospective study utilizing National Poison Data System data aimed to characterize poisoning exposures to skeletal muscle relaxants in pediatric and adolescent populations. From 2010 to 2020, a study identified 2605 cases of single-agent exposures to carisoprodol, meprobamate, methocarbamol, or metaxalone in patients aged 6 to 19. Findings revealed that the majority of cases (75.74%) were intentional exposures, with suicide attempts accounting for over half of these incidents. Clinical effects commonly observed included drowsiness, tachycardia, vomiting, and slurred speech. Most exposures (81.04%) resulted in referral or management at healthcare facilities, with intravenous fluids and activated charcoal commonly administered interventions. The study underscores the importance of understanding skeletal muscle relaxant toxicity in adolescents to inform effective management strategies.[32]
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
SMRs, including methocarbamol, are commonly prescribed for non-specific musculoskeletal pain. In 2004, an estimated 2 million American adults took a muscle relaxant, the most common indication being low back pain.[33] Low back pain was among the leading causes of years lived with disability globally in 2016.[34] A specific nociceptive etiology of low back pain is often elusive. In such cases, symptoms result from multiple factors, including biomechanical pain generators, central and peripheral nociceptive processing, medical comorbidity, and psychosocial factors.[35] A biopsychosocial approach is encouraged when a specific etiology cannot be identified due to the complexity of factors contributing to low back pain. First-line recommendations are non-pharmacologic, including patient education, maintaining activity, and using heat and ice.[36] Pharmacologic treatments are an option for those with persistent symptoms but should be part of a multi-modal treatment plan that may include psychological and biomechanically oriented therapies.
Despite more than 3 million methocarbamol prescriptions annually in the United States, limited high-quality data is available to demonstrate clinical efficacy.[1] Methocarbamol is superior to placebo for acute musculoskeletal pain and similar to other muscle relaxants. However, this conclusion is based mostly on dated, small case series and small randomized clinical trials (RCT).[37] There is conflicting evidence regarding whether methocarbamol is superior to or provides any additional benefit compared to NSAIDs. In a randomized controlled trial conducted in 2018, Friedman et al found that adding methocarbamol to naproxen did not improve outcomes at 1 week; however, their study was small. The same group also reported a similar lack of effect when methocarbamol was added to oxycodone-acetaminophen, cyclobenzaprine, corticosteroids, and diazepam.[38]
However, a retrospective cohort study published in 2024 examined injury risks linked to combining SMRs with commonly prescribed opioids in a US Medicaid population. The study results highlighted variations in injury rates based on specific SMR-opioid combinations and the order of initiation. Specifically focusing on methocarbamol, it demonstrated consistently lower injury rates compared to other SMRs like carisoprodol and tizanidine when used alongside oxycodone or tramadol. These results offer crucial insights into optimizing pain management strategies and underscore the necessity for further research to validate these findings and guide evidence-based clinical practice.[39]
Clinicians should be vigilant while prescribing methocarbamol to older patients, those at risk of polypharmacy. Clinicians should keep in mind that there is no high-quality evidence to suggest methocarbamol is more effective than NSAIDs for acute musculoskeletal pain. Nurses and pharmacists should verify that methocarbamol is used only in select patients as part of multi-modal treatment with close monitoring of efficacy, adverse effects, and polypharmacy. Additionally, extensive randomized controlled trials are warranted to guide the clinical decision-making for a drug that appears to be a popular clinical tool for prescribers without solid evidence. Interprofessional collaborative work and open communication between physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurses, and pharmacists could enhance patient outcomes related to methocarbamol.
References
. Methocarbamol. LiverTox: Clinical and Research Information on Drug-Induced Liver Injury. 2012:(): [PubMed PMID: 31643609]
van Tulder MW, Touray T, Furlan AD, Solway S, Bouter LM, Cochrane Back Review Group. Muscle relaxants for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the cochrane collaboration. Spine. 2003 Sep 1:28(17):1978-92 [PubMed PMID: 12973146]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceSee S, Ginzburg R. Skeletal muscle relaxants. Pharmacotherapy. 2008 Feb:28(2):207-13. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.2.207. Epub [PubMed PMID: 18225966]
O'DOHERTY DS, SHIELDS CD. Methocarbamol; new agent in treatment of neurological and neuromuscular diseases. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1958 May 10:167(2):160-3 [PubMed PMID: 13538683]
FORSYTH HF. Methocarbamol (robaxin) in orthopedic conditions; preliminary report of one hundred cases. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1958 May 10:167(2):163-8 [PubMed PMID: 13538684]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceSee S, Ginzburg R. Choosing a skeletal muscle relaxant. American family physician. 2008 Aug 1:78(3):365-70 [PubMed PMID: 18711953]
Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA, Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians, Denberg TD, Barry MJ, Boyd C, Chow RD, Fitterman N, Harris RP, Humphrey LL, Vijan S. Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Annals of internal medicine. 2017 Apr 4:166(7):514-530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367. Epub 2017 Feb 14 [PubMed PMID: 28192789]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceRichards BL, Whittle SL, van der Heijde DM, Buchbinder R. The efficacy and safety of muscle relaxants in inflammatory arthritis: a Cochrane systematic review. The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement. 2012 Sep:90():34-9. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120340. Epub [PubMed PMID: 22942327]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceBeebe FA, Barkin RL, Barkin S. A clinical and pharmacologic review of skeletal muscle relaxants for musculoskeletal conditions. American journal of therapeutics. 2005 Mar-Apr:12(2):151-71 [PubMed PMID: 15767833]
Level 3 (low-level) evidencePatanwala AE, Aljuhani O, Kopp BJ, Erstad BL. Methocarbamol use is associated with decreased hospital length of stay in trauma patients with closed rib fractures. American journal of surgery. 2017 Oct:214(4):738-742. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 6 [PubMed PMID: 28088301]
Looke TD, Kluth CT. Effect of preoperative intravenous methocarbamol and intravenous acetaminophen on opioid use after primary total hip and knee replacement. Orthopedics. 2013 Feb:36(2 Suppl):25-32. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130122-54. Epub [PubMed PMID: 23379573]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceAbd-Elsalam S, Arafa M, Elkadeem M, Elfert A, Soliman S, Elkhalawany W, Badawi R. Randomized-controlled trial of methocarbamol as a novel treatment for muscle cramps in cirrhotic patients. European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology. 2019 Apr:31(4):499-502. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001310. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30444744]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceUTTERBACK RA, TENNEY PH. METHOCARBAMOL IN THE THERAPY OF TETANUS. Archives of neurology. 1963 Nov:9():555-60 [PubMed PMID: 14057687]
Escobar Gil T, McGeorge KJ, Jones AJ. A Case of Tizanidine Withdrawal and Road to Recovery. Cureus. 2024 Feb:16(2):e53444. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53444. Epub 2024 Feb 2 [PubMed PMID: 38435197]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceTRUITT EB Jr, PATTERSON RB. Comparative hemolytic activity of mephenesin, guaiacol glycerol ether and methocarbamol in vitro and in vivo. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine (New York, N.Y.). 1957 Jul:95(3):422-4 [PubMed PMID: 13453457]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceElenbaas JK. Centrally acting oral skeletal muscle relaxants. American journal of hospital pharmacy. 1980 Oct:37(10):1313-23 [PubMed PMID: 6999895]
Sica DA, Comstock TJ, Davis J, Manning L, Powell R, Melikian A, Wright G. Pharmacokinetics and protein binding of methocarbamol in renal insufficiency and normals. European journal of clinical pharmacology. 1990:39(2):193-4 [PubMed PMID: 2253675]
Dent RW, Ervin DK. Relief of acute musculoskeletal symptoms with intravenous methocarbamol (robaxin injectable): a placebo-controlled study. Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental. 1976 Nov:20(5):661-5 [PubMed PMID: 825351]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceLEVENTEN EO, VACCARINO FP. Intravenous methocarbamol in 100 orthopedic patients. Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental. 1960 Oct:2():497-500 [PubMed PMID: 13761355]
Hall JG, Reed SD. Teratogens associated with congenital contractures in humans and in animals. Teratology. 1982 Apr:25(2):173-91 [PubMed PMID: 7101197]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceSpence MM, Shin PJ, Lee EA, Gibbs NE. Risk of injury associated with skeletal muscle relaxant use in older adults. The Annals of pharmacotherapy. 2013 Jul-Aug:47(7-8):993-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R735. Epub 2013 Jul 2 [PubMed PMID: 23821610]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceBy the 2023 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2023 updated AGS Beers Criteria® for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2023 Jul:71(7):2052-2081. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18372. Epub 2023 May 4 [PubMed PMID: 37139824]
Viswanathan S. Urine bag as a modern day matula. ISRN nephrology. 2013:2013():215690. doi: 10.5402/2013/215690. Epub 2013 May 23 [PubMed PMID: 24959539]
Sannerud CA, Ator NA, Griffiths RR. Methocarbamol: evaluation of reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects. Behavioural pharmacology. 1991 Apr:2(2):143-150 [PubMed PMID: 11224058]
Gahr M, Freudenmann RW, Eller J, Schönfeldt-Lecuona C. Abuse liability of centrally acting non-opioid analgesics and muscle relaxants--a brief update based on a comparison of pharmacovigilance data and evidence from the literature. The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology. 2014 Jun:17(6):957-9. doi: 10.1017/S1461145713001600. Epub 2014 Feb 20 [PubMed PMID: 24552880]
Level 3 (low-level) evidencePreston KL, Wolf B, Guarino JJ, Griffiths RR. Subjective and behavioral effects of diphenhydramine, lorazepam and methocarbamol: evaluation of abuse liability. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 1992 Aug:262(2):707-20 [PubMed PMID: 1501118]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceDawwas GK, Hennessy S, Brensinger CM, Acton EK, Bilker WB, Chung S, Dublin S, Horn JR, Manis MM, Miano TA, Oslin DW, Pham Nguyen TP, Soprano SE, Wiebe DJ, Leonard CE. Signals of Muscle Relaxant Drug Interactions Associated with Unintentional Traumatic Injury: A Population-Based Screening Study. CNS drugs. 2022 Apr:36(4):389-400. doi: 10.1007/s40263-022-00909-1. Epub 2022 Mar 6 [PubMed PMID: 35249204]
Tayar J, Jabbour G, Saggi SJ. Severe hyperosmolar metabolic acidosis due to a large dose of intravenous lorazepam. The New England journal of medicine. 2002 Apr 18:346(16):1253-4 [PubMed PMID: 11961161]
Level 3 (low-level) evidencePodrizki A. Methocarbamol and myasthenia gravis. JAMA. 1968 Sep 23:205(13):938 [PubMed PMID: 5695627]
Corcuff JB, Chardon L, El Hajji Ridah I, Brossaud J. Urinary sampling for 5HIAA and metanephrines determination: revisiting the recommendations. Endocrine connections. 2017 Aug:6(6):R87-R98. doi: 10.1530/EC-17-0071. Epub 2017 May 31 [PubMed PMID: 28566493]
Lebby TI, Dugger K, Lipscomb JW, Leikin JB. Skeletal muscle relaxant ingestion. Veterinary and human toxicology. 1990 Apr:32(2):133-5 [PubMed PMID: 2327059]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidence. 2023 ACMT Annual Scientific Meeting Abstracts - San Diego, CA. Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology. 2023 Mar 23:19(2):63-168. doi: 10.1007/s13181-023-00930-w. Epub 2023 Mar 23 [PubMed PMID: 36952114]
Dillon C, Paulose-Ram R, Hirsch R, Gu Q. Skeletal muscle relaxant use in the United States: data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). Spine. 2004 Apr 15:29(8):892-6 [PubMed PMID: 15082991]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceGBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet (London, England). 2017 Sep 16:390(10100):1211-1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2. Epub [PubMed PMID: 28919117]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceHartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, Louw Q, Ferreira ML, Genevay S, Hoy D, Karppinen J, Pransky G, Sieper J, Smeets RJ, Underwood M, Lancet Low Back Pain Series Working Group. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet (London, England). 2018 Jun 9:391(10137):2356-2367. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X. Epub 2018 Mar 21 [PubMed PMID: 29573870]
Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D, Chou R, Cohen SP, Gross DP, Ferreira PH, Fritz JM, Koes BW, Peul W, Turner JA, Maher CG, Lancet Low Back Pain Series Working Group. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. Lancet (London, England). 2018 Jun 9:391(10137):2368-2383. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30489-6. Epub 2018 Mar 21 [PubMed PMID: 29573872]
Chou R, Peterson K, Helfand M. Comparative efficacy and safety of skeletal muscle relaxants for spasticity and musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review. Journal of pain and symptom management. 2004 Aug:28(2):140-75 [PubMed PMID: 15276195]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceFriedman BW, Cisewski D, Irizarry E, Davitt M, Solorzano C, Nassery A, Pearlman S, White D, Gallagher EJ. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Naproxen With or Without Orphenadrine or Methocarbamol for Acute Low Back Pain. Annals of emergency medicine. 2018 Mar:71(3):348-356.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.031. Epub 2017 Oct 28 [PubMed PMID: 29089169]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceChen C, Hennessy S, Brensinger CM, Miano TA, Bilker WB, Dublin S, Chung SP, Horn JR, Tiwari A, Leonard CE. Comparative Risk of Injury with Concurrent Use of Opioids and Skeletal Muscle Relaxants. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. 2024 Jul:116(1):117-127. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3248. Epub 2024 Mar 14 [PubMed PMID: 38482733]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidence