Back To Search Results

Bishop Score

Editor: Ann E. Williford Updated: 9/4/2023 6:28:14 PM


In 1964, Edward Bishop set forth criteria for elective induction of labor which included parity, gestational age, fetal presentation, obstetric history, and patient consent as well as a scoring system for the cervix to help predict successful induction of labor. This pelvic scoring system, widely known as the Bishop score, is still an important determination in the prediction of successful induction of labor.  The pelvic score can be ascertained in a patient at the time of induction by a digital cervical exam to determine if cervical ripening is necessary before induction.[1][2][3]

Anatomy and Physiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Anatomy and Physiology

The Bishop score reflects the normal changes the cervix undergoes in parturition (the process of childbirth). Extensive cervical remodeling is needed for the cervix to dilate and pass a fetus fully. While human parturition is not completely understood, it is a complex system that involves interactions between placental, fetal, and maternal mechanisms. The nonpregnant cervix extracellular matrix is primarily made up of tightly packed collagen bundles. Gradually throughout the pregnancy the composition of the cervix changes with decreased collagen density and an increase in hyaluronic acid and water content. In the days to weeks before delivery, through a cascade of events, inflammatory mediators increase the production of prostaglandins. Prostaglandins invading the cervix mediate the release of metalloproteases that break down collagen and change the cervical structure. Cervical softening and distention results from these extracellular matrix compositional changes, specifically, increased vascularity and stromal and glandular hypertrophy, and are due in part to an increase in collagen solubility.


The Bishop scoring system is based on a digital cervical exam of a patient with a zero point minimum and 13 point maximum. The scoring system utilizes cervical dilation, position, effacement, consistency of the cervix, and fetal station. Cervical dilation, effacement, and station are scored 0 to 3 points, while cervical position and consistency are scored 0 to 2 points (see chart below).[4][5][6]

  • Cervical dilation is the measure of how dilated the cervix is in centimeters.  This is performed by estimating the average diameter of the open cervix.

  • Effacement is the thinning or shortening of the cervix expressed as a percentage of the whole cervix.  Zero percent effacement means the cervix is a normal, pre-labor length. Fifty percent effaced means the cervix is at half of the expected length. If the cervix is 100% effaced, it is paper thin.

  • The station is the position of the fetal head relative to the ischial spines of the maternal pelvis. The ischial spines are halfway between the pelvic inlet and outlet. At zero station, the fetal head is at the level of the ischial spines. Above and below this level are divided into thirds, by which station is denoted with negative numbers above and positive numbers below the zero station. As a fetal head makes its descent, the station changes from -3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3. In 1989, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology redefined station from -5 to +5, using centimeters instead of thirds as a measurement from the ischial spines. The Bishop score, however, uses the -3 to +3 system.

  • Position refers to the position of the cervix relative to the fetal head and maternal pelvis.

  • The consistency of the cervix refers to the feel of the cervix on the exam. A firm cervix has a consistency similar to the tip of the nose, while a soft cervix has a consistency similar to the lips of the oral cavity.

A Bishop score of 8 or greater is considered to be favorable for induction, or the chance of a vaginal delivery with induction is similar to spontaneous labor.  A score of 6 or less is considered to be unfavorable if an induction is indicated cervical ripening agents may be utilized.

The most common modification to the Bishop score is a simplified scoring system that just takes into account dilation, effacement, and station (each scored 0 to 3 points). In this shortened modification, a score of more than 5 is considered favorable.


Avoid digital cervical exams in a patient with placenta previa or before establishing a diagnosis of preterm rupture of membranes.

Clinical Significance

Induction of labor is a commonplace obstetric practice. Currently, more than 20% of pregnant women in the United States deliver as a result of labor. Predictors for success in induction include many of the similar criteria Bishop set forth in the 1960s. While, originally, the Bishop score was designed for multiparous patients, it applies to nulliparous patients undergoing induction as well. Increasing maternal parity is a strong indicator of the likelihood of successful vaginal delivery and a predictor of shorter length of labor. Fetal size, gestational age, maternal age, provider patience, and decision to induce versus expectantly manage can be correlated to differing success rates. Maternal body mass index can play a role as well, with the increased length of labor and cesarean delivery rates. The Bishop score is still widely in use to determine whether or not a cervix is “favorable” and to assess whether or not cervical ripening is needed. While Bishop score has been found to be useful for predicting vaginal delivery with sensitivity around 75% (similar between the full and modified scores) as well as a positive predictive value 83% to 84%, it has poor specificity and negative predictive value.

If a cervix is favorable, induction of labor is likely to result in vaginal delivery, and any method of induction tends to work well.  In the scenario of a favorable cervix, labor induction is normally undertaken with oxytocin and/or amniotomy.

If a cervix is considered to be unfavorable, no method is highly effective for induction so that patient is a candidate for cervical ripening. Cervical ripening is a process that helps prepare the cervix for labor and can result in a more favorable cervix. There are two main types of cervical ripening, prostaglandin use and mechanical methods.  Prostaglandins are a medication that can be given vaginally, buccally, or orally to a patient with an unscarred uterus that can help the cervix progress to a more favorable Bishop score in 12 to 24 hours. Mechanical methods such as a balloon catheter and hygroscopic dilators can be used as well. Mechanical methods, such as a balloon catheter, have shown to have similar outcomes to prostaglandins. Mechanical methods can be used in conjunction with prostaglandins in certain clinical scenarios. 

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

The bishop score is still an important determination in the prediction of successful induction of labor.  The pelvic score can be ascertained in a patient at the time of induction by a digital cervical exam to determine if cervical ripening is necessary before induction. The score is often performed by a labor and delivery nurse or an obstetrician. 


(Click Image to Enlarge)
Bishop Scoring System
Bishop Scoring System
Contributed by Kelly Wormer, MD



Hamm RF, Downes KL, Srinivas SK, Levine LD. Using the Probability of Cesarean from a Validated Cesarean Prediction Calculator to Predict Labor Length and Morbidity. American journal of perinatology. 2019 May:36(6):561-566. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675625. Epub 2018 Dec 3     [PubMed PMID: 30508870]


Coviello EM, Iqbal SN, Grantz KL, Huang CC, Landy HJ, Reddy UM. Early preterm preeclampsia outcomes by intended mode of delivery. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2019 Jan:220(1):100.e1-100.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.027. Epub 2018 Sep 28     [PubMed PMID: 30273585]


Gobillot S, Ghenassia A, Coston AL, Gillois P, Equy V, Michy T, Hoffmann P. Obstetric outcomes associated with induction of labour after caesarean section. Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction. 2018 Dec:47(10):539-543. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 22     [PubMed PMID: 30253940]


Pez V, Deruelle P, Kyheng M, Boyon C, Clouqueur E, Garabedian C. [Cervical ripening and labor induction: Evaluation of single balloon catheter compared to double balloon catheter and dinoprostone insert]. Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie. 2018 Jul-Aug:46(7-8):570-574. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 11     [PubMed PMID: 29903553]


Keulen JKJ, Bruinsma A, Kortekaas JC, van Dillen J, van der Post JAM, de Miranda E. Timing induction of labour at 41 or 42 weeks? A closer look at time frames of comparison: A review. Midwifery. 2018 Nov:66():111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Aug 11     [PubMed PMID: 30170263]


Lajusticia H, Martínez-Domínguez SJ, Pérez-Roncero GR, Chedraui P, Pérez-López FR, Health Outcomes and Systematic Analyses (HOUSSAY) Project. Single versus double-balloon catheters for the induction of labor of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2018 May:297(5):1089-1100. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4713-9. Epub 2018 Feb 14     [PubMed PMID: 29445926]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence