Back To Search Results

Cefepime

Editor: Ambika P. Eranki Updated: 2/28/2024 3:30:41 AM

Indications

(a) FDA-Approved Indications

Cefepime hydrochloride is a fourth-generation cephalosporin that belongs to a class of antibiotics known as beta-lactams. Cefepime is indicated to treat gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial infections susceptible to its antimicrobial activity. The FDA has approved several indications for cefepime.[1][2] These include:

  • Pneumonia
  • Complicated and uncomplicated urinary tract infections
  • Skin and soft tissue infections
  • Complicated intra-abdominal infections (with metronidazole)
  • Empiric treatment for neutropenic fever

The bacteria susceptible to cefepime include Streptococcus pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter group, Haemophilus influenza, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Streptococcus pyogenes, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococci viridans species, and Bacteroides fragilis.

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) 2022 guidelines recommend treatment with cefepime for cystitis caused by AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales. Cefepime can withstand hydrolysis by AmpC β-lactamases.[3][4] The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and IDSA guidelines suggest treatment with cefepime for febrile neutropenia.[5]

An ever-growing number of bacteria are becoming resistant to the activity of beta-lactam, known as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing organisms. Many ESBL organisms are resistant to cefepime. However, a sub-group of ESBLs known as Amp-C producers are susceptible. Although these organisms may be susceptible to cefepime, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the dosing regimen must be carefully evaluated before treatment to ensure effective coverage.[6][7][8]

Mechanism of Action

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Mechanism of Action

Cefepime has a mechanism of action similar to that of other beta-lactam antibiotics. Cefepime inhibits bacterial cell wall synthesis by covalently binding enzymes responsible for the final step in transpeptidation during peptidoglycan wall synthesis. This binding causes defects in the cell wall, leading to autolysis and subsequent death of the organism. 

Cefepime has increased gram-negative coverage and is more stable against beta-lactamases when compared to third-generation cephalosporins due to a few mechanisms. One such mechanism is that penicillin-binding enzymes have a lower affinity for cefepime. Another difference is that the chemical structure differs from older generations by substituting a side chain, endowing it with more activity against staphylococcal species. Cefepime is also a zwitterion, which has faster gram-negative bacteria cell wall penetration. This is also why it has broader gram-negative coverage than third-generation cephalosporins.

(a) Pharmacokinetics

(i) Absorption: Cefepime is completely absorbed after parenteral injection.

(ii) Distribution: The volume of distribution is approximately 18 L. Plasma protein binding of cefepime is low (20%); cefepime is removed by dialysis in poisoning cases. Like most cephalosporins, cefepime is widely distributed throughout body tissue and fluids, including pleural fluid, synovial fluid, bones, cerebral spinal fluid, and breast milk.

(iii) Metabolism: Ten percent to 20% of administered cefepime is metabolized to N-methyl pyrrolidine (NMP) and rapidly converted to NMP-N-oxide.[9]

(iv) Elimination: The primary route of elimination is renal excretion by glomerular filtration as an unchanged drug. The half-life is about 2 to 2.3 hours and is longer in patients with renal failure.[1][10]

Administration

(a) Dosage Forms

  • The intravenous solution as cefepime hydrochloride: 1 g/50 mL (50 mL), 2 g/100 mL (100 mL)
  • Injection powder for reconstitution as cefepime hydrochloride: 500 mg (each vial), 1 g (each vial), 2 (each vial)
  • Intravenous solution for reconstitution, as cefepime hydrochloride: 1 g cefepime per 50 mL (5% w/v) dextrose USP in water for injection.

(b) Adult Dosing

The gastrointestinal tract does not absorb cefepime well and must be administered intravenously (IV) or intramuscularly (IM). The most common method of administration is intravenous. The typical administration is 1 to 2 g every 8 to 12 hours, depending on the infection treated. Infusions are usually administered over 30 minutes.

Studies have examined extended infusions of 4 hours, showing lower overall mortality and reduced intensive care unit (ICU) lengths of stay compared with the standard 30-minute rate; however, other studies have failed to confirm these findings. Extended infusion rates for febrile neutropenia have been studied and appear feasible for treatment. For infections caused by susceptible strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, IDSA recommends treatment with a high dose of cefepime (2 g IV every 8 hours, infused over 3 hours).[3] 

Site and Type of Infection Dose Frequency Duration (days)

Urinary Tract Infections: Mild / Moderate, Uncomplicated / Complicated

0.5 to 1 g IV/IM Every 12 hours 7 to 10
Moderate to Severe Pneumonia 1 to 2 g IV Every 8 to 12 hours 10
Empiric Therapy for Febrile Neutropenic Patients 2 g IV Every 8 hours 7

Urinary Tract Infections: Severe, Uncomplicated / Complicated

2 g IV Every 12 hours 10

Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Moderate / Severe, Uncomplicated 

2 g IV Every 12 hours 10
Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections (in combination with metronidazole) 2 g IV Every 12 hours 7 to 10

(c) Specific Patient Population

(i) Hepatic Impairment: No dose adjustment of cefepime is required in patients with hepatic impairment.

(ii) Renal Impairment: Dose adjustment is required in renal impairment (creatinine clearance less than or equal to 60 mL/min). Cockcroft-Gault Equation can be used to calculate creatinine clearance.[11] Either the daily dose is reduced, or the dose is given at extended intervals for these patients.[12][13][14] The suggested dose of cefepime dosing is 1 to 2 g every 6 to 8 hours in patients undergoing CRRT (continuous renal replacement therapy).[15]

(iii) Pregnancy Considerations: Cefepime is listed as a former FDA pregnancy category B medicine. Clinicians should use cefepime after careful risk-benefit evaluation. Cefazolin is preferred for prevention in the lower segment of a cesarean section.[16]

(iv) Breastfeeding Considerations: Cefepime is excreted in breast milk. Caution is necessary with cefepime in breastfeeding women and should only be used if needed. Monitor for diarrhea and thrush in infants.[1][17]

(v) Pediatric Patients: Cefepime is FDA-approved in children and infants older than 2 months. The dose is usually 50 mg/kg every 8 to 12 hours for urinary tract infections and uncomplicated skin and structure infections. For febrile neutropenia, 50 mg/kg every 8 hours is recommended. Consideration should be given to renal function in pediatric patients.[18][19]

(vi) Older Patients: Use caution in patients with <60 mL/min creatinine clearance. Older patients are prone to neurotoxicity.[20]

Adverse Effects

Cefepime is usually well tolerated by both adult and pediatric patients. The most common adverse effects in adults are diarrhea and rash. The most common adverse effects in the pediatric population are fevers, diarrhea, and rash.

There are multitudes of other less common adverse effects listed according to the system affected:

  • Neurological: headache, fever, and neurotoxicity
  • Gastrointestinal: nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, hepatic injury, colitis including pseudomembranous colitis, oral candidiasis
  • Genitourinary: vaginitis, renal injury
  • Dermatological: local site injection irritation, pruritus, urticaria, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and erythema multiforme 
  • Hematological: positive Coombs test without hemolysis, pancytopenia, and anaplastic anemia

Adverse effects typically reverse upon removal of the medication.

Neurotoxicity is a serious, life-threatening adverse effect that deserves special mention. Symptoms can include altered mental status, encephalopathy, seizures, myoclonus, hallucinations, coma, and stroke-like symptoms. The onset of symptoms is typically 4 days after starting cefepime. Risk factors include renal failure (creatinine ≤60 mL/min), older patients, critically ill patients in ICU, strokes, Alzheimer disease, brain malignancy, history of seizures, and a compromised blood-brain barrier (BBB). The theorized mechanism is that cefepime can cross the BBB and antagonize gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors.[21][22] 

Treatment consists of stopping the drug, seizure management with benzodiazepines, or renal replacement therapy in severe refractory cases. The clinical team must monitor and adjust dosing with renal dysfunction; however, neurotoxicity is also reported in patients with normal kidney function.[23][24][25]

Drug-Drug Interactions

  • Significant drug interaction exists when using cefepime. Concurrent use of cefepime with aminoglycoside antibiotics increases the risk of cytotoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Concurrent use of cephalosporins (cefepime) and potent diuretics (eg, furosemide) can result in nephrotoxicity. Monitor renal function when these medicines are administered to the patient.[26]
  • Cefepime can lead to false positive glucose in urine; urinary glucose tests based on enzymatic glucose oxidase reactions are recommended.
  • Concurrent use of intravesical BCG for bladder carcinoma is not recommended with cefepime as it may adversely affect carcinoma outcomes.[27]
  • Concurrent administration of cholera and typhoid vaccines is not recommended due to the reduced efficacy of vaccines.[28]

Contraindications

Cefepime is contraindicated in patients with prior hypersensitivity reactions to the drug in the past.

Cephalosporins are contraindicated in patients with severe hypersensitivity reactions to penicillin. Early testing of cephalosporins (until the 1980s) came from the Penicillium mold of penicillin. The hypothesis is that these early cephalosporins were contaminated with penicillin and accounted for cross-reactivity allergic response. Thus, avoiding cephalosporins in patients with penicillin allergies likely developed from these early studies.[29][30]

Cephalosporins are similar to penicillins with the beta-lactam ring but differ by side chains. The similarities of these side chains to the penicillin structure account for the IgE-mediated cross-reactivity and not the beta-lactam ring, as previously thought. The newer generation of cephalosporins has a greater difference in the side chain structures. A severe IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction to cefepime in a penicillin-allergic patient is rare. Delayed T-cell hypersensitivity reactions can still occur because T-cells can recognize the entire beta-lactam ring and the side chains.[31][32]

Caution is advisable in patients with compromised renal function (creatinine clearance less than or equal to 60 mL/min) as roughly 85% of the drug is excreted through the urine unchanged. Caution is necessary with cefepime in pregnant or breastfeeding women and should only be used if the benefits outweigh the risks.[1] Caution is required with prolonged therapy as cefepime can lead to superinfection with Clostridium difficile (Clostridioides difficile).[33]

Monitoring

It is essential to monitor every patient for signs of a hypersensitivity reaction, especially if they have previously reacted to other beta-lactams. In addition, since cefepime is often used empirically for broad-spectrum coverage, the culture sensitivities should have close monitoring to deescalate treatment to a narrow-spectrum antibiotic. 

Renal function should be monitored with BUN and serum creatinine, especially when administered to older patients or those with pre-existing kidney dysfunction. In addition, the interprofessional clinical team must monitor for signs of neurological changes, particularly in older patients, patients with renal dysfunction, and patients with febrile neutropenia. 

The effectiveness of cefepime can vary drastically with critically ill patients treated in the intensive care unit. Drug monitoring is suggested if the patient's creatinine clearance is ≤50 mL/min or the given pathogen's minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is ≥4 mg/L. If treating outside of these parameters, then dose adjustment is indicated.[34][35][36]

PT/INR should be monitored as cefepime can elevate INR in patients with renal dysfunction.[37][38]

Toxicity

In the event of a suspected overdose, the clinician should discontinue the drug or adjust the dose. Determining if the symptoms result from an actual cefepime overdose or preexisting comorbidities may be difficult. If suspicion is high or symptoms do not subside after dose adjusting or discontinuing, blood and cerebral spinal fluid levels should be obtained to evaluate if the toxicity stems from elevated cefepime levels. Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity (CIN) can lead to generalized periodic discharges and a triphasic wave pattern on EEG. Dialysis may be necessary in severe cases.[20]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Cefepime is a common antibiotic prescribed in the hospital setting. This drug is often prescribed empirically to septic patients before a pathogen is known, as it covers a broad spectrum of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Therefore, all interprofessional healthcare team members must monitor each patient for immediate hypersensitivity reactions after initial administration. 

Clinicians need to bear in mind that the drug's pharmacokinetics can undergo alteration in patients with sepsis or renal dysfunction or in older patients, leading to undesired peaks and troughs and potentially severe adverse effects. If a patient exhibits a change in mental status or develops neurological signs such as seizure activity, cefepime should be discontinued, or dose adjustment may be required.

These changes are more likely to occur in patients with sepsis or renal dysfunction and older adults. However, cefepime can be overlooked as a possible source as it is a common medication that is usually well tolerated; therefore, nursing is crucial to successful therapy with cefepime, as they administer the drug and are on the front lines and can report these issues to the ordering clinicians so appropriate action can be taken if necessary. Consultation with a neurologist may be required for cefepime-induced neurotoxicity.

The clinician will decide to treat the patient with cefepime, but a consult with a pharmacist, particularly one with board certification in infectious disease, might be in order. Pharmacists can review the antibiogram and verify the dosing and duration. Nurses can counsel the patient on taking the medication, answer questions, monitor the patient and therapeutic effectiveness, and report any concerns to the prescriber. Cefepime therapy requires the collaborative effort of an interprofessional healthcare team, including clinicians, pharmacists, and infectious disease specialists, all working together and communicating across interprofessional lines to achieve optimal patient outcomes.

References


[1]

Chapman TM, Perry CM. Cefepime: a review of its use in the management of hospitalized patients with pneumonia. American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions. 2003:2(1):75-107     [PubMed PMID: 14720024]


[2]

Rivera CG, Narayanan PP, Patel R, Estes LL. Impact of Cefepime Susceptible-Dose-Dependent MIC for Enterobacteriaceae on Reporting and Prescribing. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2016 Jun:60(6):3854-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00442-16. Epub 2016 May 23     [PubMed PMID: 27067319]


[3]

Tamma PD, Aitken SL, Bonomo RA, Mathers AJ, van Duin D, Clancy CJ. Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022 Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2022 Aug 25:75(2):187-212. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac268. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 35439291]


[4]

Tamma PD, Aitken SL, Bonomo RA, Mathers AJ, van Duin D, Clancy CJ. Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of AmpC β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2022 Jul 6:74(12):2089-2114. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab1013. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 34864936]


[5]

Taplitz RA, Kennedy EB, Bow EJ, Crews J, Gleason C, Hawley DK, Langston AA, Nastoupil LJ, Rajotte M, Rolston K, Strasfeld L, Flowers CR. Outpatient Management of Fever and Neutropenia in Adults Treated for Malignancy: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guideline Update. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2018 May 10:36(14):1443-1453. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6211. Epub 2018 Feb 20     [PubMed PMID: 29461916]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[6]

Nguyen HM, Shier KL, Graber CJ. Determining a clinical framework for use of cefepime and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors in the treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2014 Apr:69(4):871-80. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt450. Epub 2013 Nov 20     [PubMed PMID: 24265230]


[7]

Patel HB, Lusk KA, Cota JM. The Role of Cefepime in the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Infections. Journal of pharmacy practice. 2019 Aug:32(4):458-463. doi: 10.1177/0897190017743134. Epub 2017 Nov 22     [PubMed PMID: 29166830]


[8]

Walker KJ, Lee YR, Klar AR. Clinical Outcomes of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Infections with Susceptibilities among Levofloxacin, Cefepime, and Carbapenems. The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale. 2018:2018():3747521. doi: 10.1155/2018/3747521. Epub 2018 Feb 8     [PubMed PMID: 29670677]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[9]

Endimiani A, Perez F, Bonomo RA. Cefepime: a reappraisal in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance. Expert review of anti-infective therapy. 2008 Dec:6(6):805-24. doi: 10.1586/14787210.6.6.805. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 19053894]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[10]

Kessler RE. Cefepime microbiologic profile and update. The Pediatric infectious disease journal. 2001 Mar:20(3):331-6     [PubMed PMID: 11303846]


[11]

Winter MA, Guhr KN, Berg GM. Impact of various body weights and serum creatinine concentrations on the bias and accuracy of the Cockcroft-Gault equation. Pharmacotherapy. 2012 Jul:32(7):604-12. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2012.01098.x. Epub 2012 May 10     [PubMed PMID: 22576791]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[12]

Bauer KA, West JE, O'Brien JM, Goff DA. Extended-infusion cefepime reduces mortality in patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2013 Jul:57(7):2907-12. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02365-12. Epub 2013 Apr 9     [PubMed PMID: 23571547]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[13]

Wrenn RH, Cluck D, Kennedy L, Ohl C, Williamson JC. Extended infusion compared to standard infusion cefepime as empiric treatment of febrile neutropenia. Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners. 2018 Apr:24(3):170-175. doi: 10.1177/1078155216687151. Epub 2017 Jan 11     [PubMed PMID: 28077047]


[14]

Zhu LL, Zhou Q. Optimal infusion rate in antimicrobial therapy explosion of evidence in the last five years. Infection and drug resistance. 2018:11():1105-1117. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S167616. Epub 2018 Aug 8     [PubMed PMID: 30127628]


[15]

Li L, Li X, Xia Y, Chu Y, Zhong H, Li J, Liang P, Bu Y, Zhao R, Liao Y, Yang P, Lu X, Jiang S. Recommendation of Antimicrobial Dosing Optimization During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2020:11():786. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00786. Epub 2020 May 29     [PubMed PMID: 32547394]


[16]

Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 199: Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Labor and Delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2018 Sep:132(3):e103-e119. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002833. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30134425]


[17]

. Cefepime. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed®). 2006:():     [PubMed PMID: 30000393]


[18]

Arnold CJ, Ericson J, Cho N, Tian J, Wilson S, Chu VH, Hornik CP, Clark RH, Benjamin DK Jr, Smith PB, Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act--Pediatric Trials Network Administrative Core Committee. Cefepime and Ceftazidime Safety in Hospitalized Infants. The Pediatric infectious disease journal. 2015 Sep:34(9):964-8. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000778. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 26376308]


[19]

de Cacqueray N, Hirt D, Zheng Y, Bille E, Leger PL, Rambaud J, Toubiana J, Chosidow A, Vimont S, Callot D, Chouchana L, Béranger A, Tréluyer JM, Benaboud S, Oualha M. Cefepime population pharmacokinetics and dosing regimen optimization in critically ill children with different renal function. Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2022 Oct:28(10):1389.e1-1389.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.05.007. Epub 2022 May 20     [PubMed PMID: 35605841]


[20]

Saini T, Gaines MN, Sohal A, Li L. Cefepime-Induced Neurotoxicity. Cureus. 2021 Sep:13(9):e17831. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17831. Epub 2021 Sep 8     [PubMed PMID: 34660040]


[21]

Payne LE, Gagnon DJ, Riker RR, Seder DB, Glisic EK, Morris JG, Fraser GL. Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity: a systematic review. Critical care (London, England). 2017 Nov 14:21(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1856-1. Epub 2017 Nov 14     [PubMed PMID: 29137682]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[22]

Deshayes S, Coquerel A, Verdon R. Neurological Adverse Effects Attributable to β-Lactam Antibiotics: A Literature Review. Drug safety. 2017 Dec:40(12):1171-1198. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0578-2. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28755095]


[23]

Huwyler T, Lenggenhager L, Abbas M, Ing Lorenzini K, Hughes S, Huttner B, Karmime A, Uçkay I, von Dach E, Lescuyer P, Harbarth S, Huttner A. Cefepime plasma concentrations and clinical toxicity: a retrospective cohort study. Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2017 Jul:23(7):454-459. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 19     [PubMed PMID: 28111294]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[24]

Isitan C, Ferree A, Hohler AD. Cefepime induced neurotoxicity: A case series and review of the literature. eNeurologicalSci. 2017 Sep:8():40-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ensci.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 4     [PubMed PMID: 29260037]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[25]

Appa AA, Jain R, Rakita RM, Hakimian S, Pottinger PS. Characterizing Cefepime Neurotoxicity: A Systematic Review. Open forum infectious diseases. 2017 Fall:4(4):ofx170. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx170. Epub 2017 Oct 10     [PubMed PMID: 29071284]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[26]

Alhassani RY, Bagadood RM, Balubaid RN, Barno HI, Alahmadi MO, Ayoub NA. Drug Therapies Affecting Renal Function: An Overview. Cureus. 2021 Nov:13(11):e19924. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19924. Epub 2021 Nov 26     [PubMed PMID: 34976524]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[27]

Pak S, Kim SY, Kim SH, Joung JY, Park WS, Chung J, Lee KH, Seo HK. Association Between Antibiotic Treatment and the Efficacy of Intravesical BCG Therapy in Patients With High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Frontiers in oncology. 2021:11():570077. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.570077. Epub 2021 Apr 2     [PubMed PMID: 33868985]


[28]

Jackson BR, Iqbal S, Mahon B, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Updated recommendations for the use of typhoid vaccine--Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2015. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2015 Mar 27:64(11):305-8     [PubMed PMID: 25811680]


[29]

Vorobeichik L, Weber EA, Tarshis J. Misconceptions Surrounding Penicillin Allergy: Implications for Anesthesiologists. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2018 Sep:127(3):642-649. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003419. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29757781]


[30]

Pichichero ME, Zagursky R. Penicillin and cephalosporin allergy. Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology. 2014 May:112(5):404-12. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.02.005. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24767695]


[31]

Mine Y, Nishida M, Goto S, Kuwahara S. Cefazolin, a new semisynthetic cephalosporin antibiotic. IV. Antigenicity of cefazolin and its cross reactivity with benzylpenicillin, ampicillin and cephaloridine. The Journal of antibiotics. 1970 Apr:23(4):195-203     [PubMed PMID: 5429508]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[32]

Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Drug allergy: an updated practice parameter. Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology. 2010 Oct:105(4):259-273. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.08.002. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 20934625]


[33]

Shah K, Pass LA, Cox M, Lanham M, Arnold FW. Evaluating contemporary antibiotics as a risk factor for Clostridium difficile infection in surgical trauma patients. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. 2012 Mar:72(3):691-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823c5637. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22491554]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[34]

Durand-Maugard C, Lemaire-Hurtel AS, Gras-Champel V, Hary L, Maizel J, Prud'homme-Bernardy A, Andréjak C, Andréjak M. Blood and CSF monitoring of cefepime-induced neurotoxicity: nine case reports. The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2012 May:67(5):1297-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks012. Epub 2012 Jan 31     [PubMed PMID: 22298349]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[35]

Lamoth F, Buclin T, Pascual A, Vora S, Bolay S, Decosterd LA, Calandra T, Marchetti O. High cefepime plasma concentrations and neurological toxicity in febrile neutropenic patients with mild impairment of renal function. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2010 Oct:54(10):4360-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01595-08. Epub 2010 Jul 12     [PubMed PMID: 20625153]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[36]

Chapuis TM, Giannoni E, Majcherczyk PA, Chioléro R, Schaller MD, Berger MM, Bolay S, Décosterd LA, Bugnon D, Moreillon P. Prospective monitoring of cefepime in intensive care unit adult patients. Critical care (London, England). 2010:14(2):R51. doi: 10.1186/cc8941. Epub 2010 Apr 1     [PubMed PMID: 20359352]


[37]

Ortega AJ, Ghafouri SR, Vu L, Edwards B, Nickel N. Cefepime-Induced Encephalopathy in a High-Risk Patient With Renal Insufficiency and Cirrhosis. Cureus. 2021 Oct:13(10):e18767. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18767. Epub 2021 Oct 14     [PubMed PMID: 34796060]


[38]

Baillargeon J, Holmes HM, Lin YL, Raji MA, Sharma G, Kuo YF. Concurrent use of warfarin and antibiotics and the risk of bleeding in older adults. The American journal of medicine. 2012 Feb:125(2):183-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.08.014. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22269622]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence