Back To Search Results

Chiari Malformation Type 2

Editor: Prabhu D. Emmady Updated: 2/25/2024 1:26:50 PM

Introduction

At the end of the nineteenth century, the pathologists Julius Arnold (1835-1915) and Hans Chiari (1851-1916) described a complex clinical and pathological condition involving deformity of the cerebellum and brainstem in children. Chiari malformations are now defined as a spectrum of hindbrain abnormalities involving the cerebellum, brainstem, skull base, and cervical cord. According to the type of herniation of the brain tissue displaced in the spinal canal and the characteristics of the anomalies of the brain or spine development, 4 types of Chiari malformations have been classified. Together with basilar invaginations, Chiari malformations represent the most common craniocervical junction malformations seen in adults.

Chiari malformation type 2 or Chiari 2 malformation, commonly referred to as Arnold-Chiari malformation, is usually associated with spina bifida and is characterized by caudal displacement of the cerebellar vermis, brainstem, and fourth ventricle.[1][2] Despite its name, rather than a continuation of a spectrum with Chiari 2 malformation representing a severe version of Chiari 1 malformation, these malformations represent distinct disease processes with overlapping radiographic findings. (see Image. Chiari Malformation Types 1 and 2). Chiari 2 malformation can be associated with numerous additional findings, most commonly hydrocephalus and syringomyelia. Clinically, Chiari 1 malformation can be an asymptomatic hindbrain hernia, while Chiari types 2, 3, and 4 are congenital and clinically significant. Chiari 2 malformation may present a variety of clinical manifestations, which can include spinal symptoms secondary to myelomeningocele, tethered cord syndrome or syringomyelia, symptoms of secondary hydrocephalus, brainstem symptoms, or those due to lower cranial nerve dysfunction. The nosographic collocation of type 0 or 0.5 Chiari malformation or Chiari-like symptoms without tonsillar herniation, type 1.5 Chiari malformation between types 1 and 2, and complex Chiari is controversial and not universally accepted.[3]

Table. Chiari Malformation Types

Chiari Type Features
Chiari 0
  • Syrinx is present.
  • No identifiable cause may be found.
  • Does not respond to posterior fossa decompression.
  • No tonsillar descent noted.
Chiari 0.5
  • A horizontal line is drawn at the level of the foramen magnum through the middle of the caudal medulla.
  • There is ventrolateral herniation of cerebellar tonsils anterior to this line.
Chiari 1
  • Caudal descent by >5 mm of the cerebellar tonsils below the basion-opisthion line (ie, McRae's line) is observed.
  • Associated with syringomyelia, the dilation of the spinal cord central canal with a diameter of ≥3 mm in 12% and 80% of patients.
  • Hydrocephalus may be present in up to 10% of patients with Chiari 1 malformation.
Chiari 1.5
  • Caudal descent of the cerebellar tonsils below McRae's line
  • Associated descent of the brainstem with obex
Chiari 2 (Arnold-Chiari malformation)
  • Descent of the cerebellar vermis and brainstem into the upper cervical canal
  • Always associated with myelomeningocele
Chiari 3
  • Cerebellar herniation into a posterior defect of the bifid upper cervical spine resulting in an encephalocele
  • Caudal descent of the medulla
Chiari 3.5
  • Rarely occurs
  • Associated with multiple congenital abnormalities
  • Absence of cervical vertebrae
  • Dura mater does not extend into the spinal canal
  • A fistulous tract is present between the fourth ventricle and the esophagus.
Chiari 4
  • Primarily characterized by cerebellar hypoplasia
  • This malformation type may be associated with an occipital encephalocele.

Etiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Etiology

The precise etiology of Chiari 2 malformation is not entirely understood, with multiple proposed theories over the years. The most recent and accepted theory is the "unified theory," which assumes that the neural tube defect is the etiology from which the cranial features follow.[4] Earlier theories based on tethering of the spinal cord by the myelomeningocele resulting in caudal traction on the hindbrain and brainstem structures have fallen out of favor. 

Epidemiology

Chiari 2 malformations are relatively rare, with no large-scale study accurately estimating their incidence. Experts have estimated that the incidence of Chiari 2 malformation occurs in 0.44 of 1,000 births without a gender predominance.[5] Given its association with myelomeningocele, perinatal folate supplementation can decrease its incidence.[6]

Pathophysiology

The current best evidence for the pathophysiology of Chiari 2 malformation is the development of a pressure gradient across the foramen magnum, creating a craniospinal pressure gradient that will cause or hasten the development of a hindbrain hernia. The unified theory assumes that the neural tube defect occurs first, followed by all other manifestations.[4] Ultimately, multiple abnormalities ensue because the lack of mechanical support that the typically distended primitive ventricles provide prohibits normal development of the brain and overlying skull. 

History and Physical

Chiari 2 malformation may present a variety of clinical manifestations, which can include spinal symptoms secondary to myelomeningocele, tethered cord syndrome or syringomyelia, symptoms of secondary hydrocephalus, brainstem symptoms, or those due to lower cranial nerve dysfunction. Clinical findings related to the Chiari 2 malformation are often due to brainstem and lower cranial nerve dysfunction. The age of symptom onset is rare in adulthood. The clinical presentation in neonates also differs from that of the older child, who is more likely to experience insidious, rarely severe symptom onset.[7] The symptomatic neonate with Chiari 2 malformation is more likely to develop rapid neurologic deterioration over several days with profound brainstem dysfunction.[7] Other associated clinical findings may include:

  • Facial weakness
  • Weak or absent cry
  • Nystagmus, especially downbeat nystagmus
  • Opisthotonos
  • Aspiration
  • Arm weakness that may progress to quadriparesis [8]
  • Apneic spells due to impaired ventilatory drive
  • Transient stridor that may progress to respiratory arrest secondary to vagal nerve paresis
  • Swallowing difficulties and decreased gag reflex that may manifest as poor feeding, prolonged feeding, nasal regurgitation, cyanosis during feeding, and pooling of oral secretions [7][9]

Symptoms related to syringomyelia, if present, are often associated with the involved spinal cord level, size, and location of the syrinx. Syringomyelia classically presents with dissociated sensory loss (ie, preserved light touch and proprioception with loss of pain and temperature sensation), variable pain involvement, autonomic symptoms, sensorimotor dysfunction, Lhermitte phenomenon, neurogenic arthropathy, and musculoskeletal abnormalities. Scoliosis may present in associated with syringomyelia secondary to lateralized anterior horn compression manifesting as inequality of paravertebral muscle strength. Patients with scoliosis secondary to underlying syringomyelia often present at a young age with an atypical curve, rapid curve progression, and back pain symptoms. 

Evaluation

Diagnostic Imaging Studies

When evaluating a patient with Chiari 2 malformation, the diagnosis is primarily based on the neuroanatomy seen with imaging studies. Neuroimaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides the highest resolution in evaluating patients with Chiari 2 malformation. For patients who cannot tolerate an MRI, a computed tomography (CT) can also aid in diagnosing Chiari 2 malformation and provide further detail on osseous anatomy. However, the disadvantages of CT include lower resolution, posterior fossa artifact, and ionizing radiation to the child. If fetal ventriculomegaly is present, Chiari 2 malformation can be detected with fetal ultrasound in some cases. In addition to the characteristic features of cerebellar vermis, brainstem, and fourth ventricle caudal displacement, the following findings may also be present:

  • Lemon sign: describes the frontal bone indentation depicting a lemon
  • Banana cerebellum sign: describes the cerebellum wrapping around the brain stem 
  • Beaking of tectum
  • Absence of the septum pellucidum with an enlarged interthalamic adhesion
  • Hydrocephalus
  • Syringomyelia
  • Craniolacunia of the skull (ie, Luckenschadel) [10]
  • Skeletal abnormalities (eg, platybasia, basilar impression, and Klippel-Feil deformity)
  • Microgyria 
  • Heterotopias
  • Myelomeningocele
  • Tethered cord syndrome
  • Agenesis or dysgenesis of the corpus callosum [11][12]

Overall, diagnosing Chiari 2 malformation requires careful evaluation if there is evidence of spinal myelomeningocele. MRI can help diagnose Chiari 2 malformation by showing a downward displacement of the medulla and cerebellum vermis, among other possible findings described above. In this particular patient population, hydrocephalus or shunt failure should be suspected as the etiology of presenting symptoms first and foremost; these should be excluded before attributing symptoms to a syrinx, tethered cord syndrome, or Chiari 2 pathology. 

Ancillary Diagnostic Studies

Other ancillary studies that may be considered in addition to diagnostic imaging include:

  • Sleep studies: Involves sleeping overnight in a room where they can monitor breathing, snoring, oxygenation, and seizure activity to identify evidence of sleep apnea.

  • Swallow studies: Fluoroscopy is used to demonstrate cricopharyngeal achalasia. 

  • Laryngoscopy: This study can visually verify the movement and function of the vocal cords.[13][14][15]

Treatment / Management

Managing Chiari 2 malformation depends on the extent of the craniospinal malformation and associated neurological impairments. The natural history of patients with Chiari 2 malformation is quite serious, with medullary symptoms remaining the leading cause of death. Surgical intervention is often required to repair associated open neural tube defects and provide cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion of hydrocephalus, typically via shunting. Early suboccipital hindbrain decompression surgery is accepted in an infant or child with symptoms found to be directly related to Chiari 2 malformation. However, there remain few studies exploring the role of decompressive surgery in this patient population, creating ongoing controversy. Those arguing against surgery propose that many of the neurologic findings may be due to intrinsic abnormalities for which surgical intervention cannot improve.[16][17] Proponents of expeditious brainstem decompression argue that the histologic lesions are due to chronic brainstem compression and concomitant ischemia and that surgery should be carried out if the warning signs of stridor, apneic spells, or neurogenic dysphagia are present.[7][18] (B2)

Clinicians should consider excluding viral etiologies before attributing the presence or acute worsening of stridor and apnea to the Chiari 2 malformation. Certain medical problems, including neonatal feeding difficulties, apnea, respiratory failure, and neurogenic bowel, may require medical or surgical management.[19]

Surgical intervention to repair myelomeningocele is commonly required. Some evidence has demonstrated the benefits of performing the myelomeningocele repair on the in-utero fetus.[20] For infants with a myelomeningocele diagnosis who did not have a fetal intervention performed, delivery should ideally occur in a hospital with a level III neonatal ICU. Initial management following the delivery includes providing prophylactic antibiotics and covering the lesion. Within the first 72 hours, the open neural tube defect should be repaired surgically.[21] Following surgery, the patient requires close evaluation for the development of hydrocephalus.[22] Serial evaluation for abnormal neurological function is necessary throughout life. Nearly all patients with myelomeningocele will have a neurogenic bladder. This typically requires intermittent catheterization to decrease the risk of renal disease. Notably, a change in function may suggest an acute neurological complication.[23](B2)

Hydrocephalus is a common problem encountered in the management of Chiari 2 malformation. Neuroimaging findings and the severity of symptoms primarily determine the timing and need for surgical intervention in patients. Urgent surgical intervention is required in patients with rapidly progressive hydrocephalus. Another important indication for surgery is if a patient is symptomatic and has hydrocephalus. Some symptoms include vomiting, developmental delays, headaches, focal neurologic deficits, and papilledema. An additional indication includes progressive ventriculomegaly and clear evidence of an obvious obstruction on imaging. The clinician should be mindful that in patients with Chiari 2 malformation, ventricular size may not change in the setting of shunt malfunction.[24] The most common surgical intervention is the placement of a shunt. CSF diversion by shunting prevents CSF from accumulating and increasing intracranial pressure, which can ultimately be fatal.

Differential Diagnosis

The treating clinician should know that presenting signs and symptoms may be associated with myelomeningocele, syringomyelia, scoliosis, and hydrocephalus or shunt failure. The differential diagnoses for Chiari 2 malformation also includes the following:

  • Fourth ventricle ependymoma
  • Lhermitte-Duclos disease
  • Rhombencephalosynapsis
  • Other Chiari malformation types 

Prognosis

The prognosis of Chiari 2 malformation is variable, dependent on the extent of the malformations and the patient's symptoms. The mortality rate is 71% in infants with vocal cord paralysis, arm weakness, or cardiopulmonary arrest within 2 weeks of presentation, in comparison to patients with a more gradual deterioration who had a 23% mortality.[7] Bilateral vocal cord paralysis is a poor prognosticator for response to suboccipital decompression surgery.[7] In patients requiring suboccipital hindbrain decompression, 68% had a complete or near-complete resolution in symptoms, 20% had no improvement, and 12% had mild to moderate residual deficits.[7]

Complications

In a published series on patients with Chiari 2 malformation who underwent suboccipital hindbrain decompression surgery, respiratory arrest was the most common cause of mortality in 8 out of 17 patients who died, followed by meningitis or ventriculitis in 6 patients, aspiration in 2 patients, and biliary atresia in 1 patient.[9] There was a 37.8% mortality rate in patients who underwent surgery, with follow-up ranging as far out as 6 years.[9]

Deterrence and Patient Education

Chiari 2 malformation, or Arnold-Chiari malformation, is usually associated with spina bifida and is characterized by caudal displacement of the cerebellar vermis, brainstem, and fourth ventricle.[1] Most patients with myelomeningocele also have Chiari 2 malformation in addition to hydrocephalus. Diagnosis of Chiari 2 malformation is primarily made radiographically by MRI. The treatment is typically centered upon a surgical intervention but is complex because of the variability of the malformation and associated clinical presentation. The prognosis of Chiari 2 malformation is dependent upon the extent of craniospinal malformation. While nothing can be done to prevent congenital Chiari 2 malformation, patient education plays a significant role in familiarising the patient's family with the signs and symptoms of the condition and helping to manage expectations. Patient education and counseling regarding conservative and surgical management strategies are also critical in the shared decision-making process.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Chiari 2 malformation is best managed using an interprofessional team that includes primary care clinicians, neurosurgeons, radiologists, urologists, orthopedic surgeons, and occasionally otolaryngologists. Trained nurses, physical therapists, and pharmacists should also assist in caring for patients with Chiari 2 malformation. The patients typically present early in their clinical course because of the associated abnormalities, including myelomeningocele. Utilizing clinical and radiographic findings, the diagnosis can be made. Treatment of Chiari 2 malformation often requires intervention from neurosurgery. Attention must also be given to neonatal feeding difficulties, apnea, respiratory failure, and neurogenic bowel. Rehabilitation is essential to regain mobility and function if there is residual impairment, as well as long-term follow-up to monitor for worsening symptoms. Open communication among interprofessional team members is indispensable for improving outcomes.

Media


(Click Image to Enlarge)
<p>Chiari Malformation Types 1 and 2</p>

Chiari Malformation Types 1 and 2

Contributed by C Rowe

References


[1]

Sarnat HB. Disorders of segmentation of the neural tube: Chiari malformations. Handbook of clinical neurology. 2008:87():89-103. doi: 10.1016/S0072-9752(07)87006-0. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 18809020]


[2]

Fons K, Jnah AJ. Arnold-Chiari Malformation: Core Concepts. Neonatal network : NN. 2021 Aug 1:40(5):313-320. doi: 10.1891/11-T-704. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 34518383]


[3]

Cools MJ, Wellons JC 3rd, Iskandar BJ. The Nomenclature of Chiari Malformations. Neurosurgery clinics of North America. 2023 Jan:34(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Nov 2     [PubMed PMID: 36424049]


[4]

McLone DG, Knepper PA. The cause of Chiari II malformation: a unified theory. Pediatric neuroscience. 1989:15(1):1-12     [PubMed PMID: 2699756]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[5]

Hidalgo JA, Tork CA, Varacallo M. Arnold-Chiari Malformation. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 28613730]


[6]

Wilson RD, Genetics Committee, Wilson RD, Audibert F, Brock JA, Carroll J, Cartier L, Gagnon A, Johnson JA, Langlois S, Murphy-Kaulbeck L, Okun N, Pastuck M, Special Contributors, Deb-Rinker P, Dodds L, Leon JA, Lowel HL, Luo W, MacFarlane A, McMillan R, Moore A, Mundle W, O'Connor D, Ray J, Van den Hof M. Pre-conception Folic Acid and Multivitamin Supplementation for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Neural Tube Defects and Other Folic Acid-Sensitive Congenital Anomalies. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC. 2015 Jun:37(6):534-52     [PubMed PMID: 26334606]


[7]

Pollack IF, Pang D, Albright AL, Krieger D. Outcome following hindbrain decompression of symptomatic Chiari malformations in children previously treated with myelomeningocele closure and shunts. Journal of neurosurgery. 1992 Dec:77(6):881-8     [PubMed PMID: 1432130]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[8]

Hoffman HJ, Hendrick EB, Humphreys RP. Manifestations and management of Arnold-Chiari malformation in patients with myelomeningocele. Child's brain. 1975:1(4):255-9     [PubMed PMID: 1102268]


[9]

Park TS, Hoffman HJ, Hendrick EB, Humphreys RP. Experience with surgical decompression of the Arnold-Chiari malformation in young infants with myelomeningocele. Neurosurgery. 1983 Aug:13(2):147-52     [PubMed PMID: 6888694]


[10]

Darouich S. Luckenschadel Associated with Chiari Type II Malformation: An Autopsy Case Report. Fetal and pediatric pathology. 2021 Dec:40(6):697-701. doi: 10.1080/15513815.2020.1732508. Epub 2020 Feb 25     [PubMed PMID: 32096430]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[11]

Meller C, Aiello H, Otaño L. Sonographic detection of open spina bifida in the first trimester: review of the literature. Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2017 Jul:33(7):1101-1106. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3443-9. Epub 2017 May 16     [PubMed PMID: 28510070]


[12]

Zollner U, Rehn M, Girschick G, Dietl J. [Sonographic abnormalities of the fetal CNS in the second trimester screening--clarifications according to the new maternity directives]. Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie. 2012 Feb:216(1):1-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299770. Epub 2012 Feb 13     [PubMed PMID: 22331522]


[13]

Gendell HM, McCallum JE, Reigel DH. Cricopharyngeal achalasia associated with Arnold-Chiari malformation in childhood. Child's brain. 1978:4(2):65-73     [PubMed PMID: 639601]


[14]

Katwa U, Sisniega C, McKeon M, Lee GS. Sleep endoscopy-directed management of Arnold-Chiari malformation: a child with persistent obstructive sleep apnea. Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. 2020 Feb 15:16(2):325-329. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8194. Epub 2020 Jan 13     [PubMed PMID: 31992420]


[15]

Lazzareschi I, Curatola A, Massimi L, Rendeli C, Rollo E, Scala I, Della Marca G, Brunetti V. Sleep-disordered breathing in patients with Chiari malformation type II: a case-control study and review of the literature. Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. 2022 Sep 1:18(9):2143-2154. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10062. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 35645039]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[16]

Gilbert JN, Jones KL, Rorke LB, Chernoff GF, James HE. Central nervous system anomalies associated with meningomyelocele, hydrocephalus, and the Arnold-Chiari malformation: reappraisal of theories regarding the pathogenesis of posterior neural tube closure defects. Neurosurgery. 1986 May:18(5):559-64     [PubMed PMID: 3714003]


[17]

Bell WO, Charney EB, Bruce DA, Sutton LN, Schut L. Symptomatic Arnold-Chiari malformation: review of experience with 22 cases. Journal of neurosurgery. 1987 Jun:66(6):812-6     [PubMed PMID: 3572510]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[18]

Talamonti G, Marcati E, Mastino L, Meccariello G, Picano M, D'Aliberti G. Surgical management of Chiari malformation type II. Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2020 Aug:36(8):1621-1634. doi: 10.1007/s00381-020-04675-7. Epub 2020 May 30     [PubMed PMID: 32474814]


[19]

Jang M, Biggs P, North L, Foy A, Chun R. Management and outcomes of pediatric vocal cord paresis in Chiari malformation. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2018 Dec:115():49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.09.014. Epub 2018 Sep 18     [PubMed PMID: 30368392]


[20]

Adzick NS. Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele: trials and tribulations. Isabella Forshall Lecture. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2012 Feb:47(2):273-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.11.021. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22325376]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[21]

Burke R, Liptak GS, Council on Children with Disabilities. Providing a primary care medical home for children and youth with spina bifida. Pediatrics. 2011 Dec:128(6):e1645-57. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2219. Epub 2011 Nov 28     [PubMed PMID: 22123894]


[22]

Chakraborty A, Crimmins D, Hayward R, Thompson D. Toward reducing shunt placement rates in patients with myelomeningocele. Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics. 2008 May:1(5):361-5. doi: 10.3171/PED/2008/1/5/361. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 18447669]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[23]

Brock JW 3rd, Thomas JC, Baskin LS, Zderic SA, Thom EA, Burrows PK, Lee H, Houtrow AJ, MacPherson C, Adzick NS, Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD MOMS Trial Group. Effect of Prenatal Repair of Myelomeningocele on Urological Outcomes at School Age. The Journal of urology. 2019 Oct:202(4):812-818. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000334. Epub 2019 Sep 6     [PubMed PMID: 31075056]


[24]

Piatt JH Jr. Syringomyelia complicating myelomeningocele: review of the evidence. Journal of neurosurgery. 2004 Feb:100(2 Suppl Pediatrics):101-9     [PubMed PMID: 14758937]