Back To Search Results

Drug Metabolism

Editor: Charles V. Preuss Updated: 8/17/2023 10:37:38 AM

Introduction

Most drugs are xenobiotics, ie, chemical substances not naturally produced by the body. Xenobiotics undergo various body processes for detoxification, thus reducing their toxicity and allowing them to be readily available for excretion. These processes allow for the chemical modification of drugs into their metabolites and are known as drug metabolism or metabolic biotransformation.[1][2]

These metabolites are the byproducts of drug metabolism and can be characterized by active, inactive, and toxic metabolites. Active metabolites are biochemically active compounds with therapeutic effects, whereas inactive metabolites are biochemically inactive compounds with neither a therapeutic nor toxic effect. Toxic metabolites are biochemically active compounds similar to active metabolites but have various harmful effects.[3]

Drug metabolism occurs at a specific location in the body, resulting in a low concentration of active metabolites in the systemic circulation. This phenomenon is called first-pass metabolism because it limits drug bioavailability. First-pass metabolism primarily occurs in the liver; however, metabolizing enzymes can be found throughout the body.[2][3] 

Understanding these alterations in chemical activity is crucial in utilizing the optimal pharmacological intervention for any patient. This is a topic of interest to any provider who routinely treats patients with medications.[1][2][3][4]

Function

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Function

The kidneys are primarily responsible for the excretion of drugs from the body; however, lipophilic drugs readily cross the cell membrane of the kidney tubules and are reabsorbed into the blood.[3] Therefore, lipophilic drugs are first metabolized in the liver before excretion of the drug can be possible. The metabolism of drugs can occur in various reactions, categorized as phase I (modification), phase II (conjugation), and in some instances, phase III (additional modification and excretion).

Phase I modifications alter the lipophilic drug chemical structure through oxidation, reduction, hydrolysis, cyclization/decyclization, and either by removing hydrogen or adding oxygen to more polar molecules. In some instances, this process changes an inactive prodrug into a metabolically active drug. Oxidation typically results in metabolites that still retain some of their pharmacological activity. For example, phase I modification transforms the common anxiolytic drug diazepam into desmethyldiazepam and then further into oxazepam. Both of those metabolites produce similar physiological and psychological effects to diazepam itself. The cytochrome P450 system, also known as microsomal mixed function oxidase, catalyzes most phase I reactions.[3][5]

In phase II modifications, a drug molecule couples with another molecule in a conjugation reaction. Conjugation usually renders the compound pharmacologically inert and water-soluble, allowing the compound to be easily excreted. Conjugation mechanisms include methylation, acetylation, sulphation, glucuronidation, and glycine or glutathione conjugation. These processes can occur in various locations, such as the liver, kidney, lungs, intestines, and other organ systems. An example of phase II metabolism is oxazepam, which conjugates with another molecule called glucuronide. The drug becomes physiologically inactive and is excreted without further chemical modification.[5][6]

Phase III metabolism may also follow phase II metabolism, in which conjugates and metabolites are excreted from the cells. A critical factor in drug metabolism is the enzymatic catalysis of phase I and II processes. The type and concentration of liver enzymes are crucial to the efficient metabolism of drugs. The most commonly used enzymes for medical purposes are monoamine oxidase and cytochrome P450. These 2 enzymes are responsible for metabolizing dozens of biogenic and xenobiotic chemicals.

As the name suggests, monoamine oxidase catalyzes the processing of monoamines such as serotonin and dopamine. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) are used as antidepressants that increase serotonin and dopamine levels in the brain. The cytochrome P450 system is a family of heme-containing isoenzymes, primarily located in the liver and gastrointestinal tract, responsible for metabolizing many drugs and compounds, such as lipids and steroids.[7] Cytochrome P450 catalyzes the metabolism of many psychoactive drugs, including amphetamines and opioids.[8]

Issues of Concern

Drug metabolism can affect the plasma concentrations of drugs, which must be considered. Prescribers must be concerned about drug-drug interactions, as they may negatively impact the patient's health. For example, if rifampin is taken concurrently with imatinib, imatinib's plasma concentrations can be reduced because rifampin can induce CYP3A4 activity and metabolize imatinib at a much faster rate. Thus, imatinib's anticancer activity can be attenuated.[7][8]

Similarly, if the patient takes omeprazole to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) concurrently with imatinib, imatinib's plasma concentrations increase. This occurs because omeprazole is a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4, and CYP3A4 metabolizes imatinib. The inhibition of CYP3A4 causes the accumulation of imatinib, leading to toxicities.[7][8][9]

Aging is another factor that affects drug metabolism. Drug metabolism slows with age, making older patients more susceptible to adverse reactions. Prescribers should keep in mind the patient's age when prescribing medication. Genetic polymorphism of drug-metabolizing enzymes can also cause variations in drug effects, leading to patients reacting differently to various drugs.[9]

Clinical Significance

In any pharmacological intervention, the prescriber must consider how and when a specific drug is eliminated from the body. Most of the time, drug clearance occurs according to first-order kinetics; in other words, the clearance rate depends on the drug's plasma concentration. That is, the elimination rate is proportional to the drug's concentration. The rate of this form of clearance depends upon the chemical in question and is often represented by a half-life. This is the time it takes for 50% of the drug to be eliminated from the body. For example, the half-life of cocaine is approximately 1 hour; thus, after 4 hours, only about 6.25% of the initial dose is present within the body.[10]

However, the elimination of some drugs occurs at a constant rate that is independent of plasma concentrations. Ethanol is an example; it is eliminated at a constant rate of about 15 mL/hour regardless of the concentration in the bloodstream. This is called zero-order kinetics and occurs when enzyme binding sites are saturated at low concentrations. Kinetics are of interest in medicine because monitoring drug concentration is often of clinical importance with many medications. Understanding pharmacokinetics, specifically drug elimination, allows providers to alter patient-specific therapies. Therapy aims to achieve a steady-state plasma concentration at which drug metabolism and elimination occur simultaneously.[10][11]

Metabolism is a highly variable process that can be influenced by several factors. One major disruptor of drug metabolism is depot binding, meaning the coupling of drug molecules to inactive sites in the body such that the drug is no longer accessible for metabolism. This can affect the duration of action of pharmacological agents susceptible to depot binding. One notable example is tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive component of marijuana. THC is highly lipid-soluble, and depot binds in the adipose tissue of users. This interaction drastically slows the drug's metabolism, which is why metabolites of THC can be detected in urine weeks after the patient's last use.[10][11][12][13]

Another factor in drug metabolism is enzyme induction. Enzymes are induced by repeated use of the same chemical. The body becomes accustomed to the constant presence of the drug and compensates by increasing the production of enzymes necessary for the drug's metabolism. This contributes to pharmacological tolerance and is one reason patients need ever-increasing doses of certain drugs to produce the same effect.

Opioids are a prime example. Patients with long-term prescriptions for opioid analgesics notice their medication becomes less effective over time. Notably, induction increases the metabolic rate for all drugs processed via the enzyme induced; for example, chronic amphetamine use causes higher concentrations of CYP2D6. This enzyme is also essential in the metabolism of certain opioids, such as oxycodone; thus, a physician prescribing oxycodone to a patient using amphetamines would have to prescribe a higher dose to produce the desired effect.[11]

In contrast, some drugs have an inhibitory effect on enzymes, making the patient more sensitive to other medications metabolized through the action of those enzymes. A classic example is the inhibition of monoamine oxidase by certain antidepressant drugs. These compounds produce psychotherapeutic effects by blocking the enzyme that breaks down 'pleasure' chemicals in the brain. However, this can cause problems when patients on an MAOI take other drugs, which can cause abnormally high concentrations of these neurochemicals. A patient on an MAOI who uses cocaine, which elevates the concentration of serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine, will experience a much more potent effect from the cocaine. This interaction can lead to numerous physiological problems, including tachycardia, hypertension, and serotonin syndrome.[12][14]

Drugs that share elements of their metabolic pathways can also 'compete' for the same binding sites on enzymes, decreasing their metabolism's efficiency. For instance, alcohol and certain sedatives are metabolized by the same member of the cytochrome P450 family. Only a limited number of enzymes exist to break these chemicals down. Thus, if pentobarbital is administered to a patient who is also metabolizing alcohol, the pentobarbital would not be completely metabolized because most of the necessary enzymes would be filled by alcohol molecules; this is one reason that alcohol and other sedative or hypnotic drugs can have a synergistic effect when coadministered.[7][8]

Other Issues

Regardless of whether a drug is renally or hepatically metabolized and eliminated, impairment in either of these systems can cause significant issues. These issues can include altered dosing, dose intervals, and therapeutic effect; the pathway for metabolism can determine if a particular drug can be prescribed and used for a specific patient.[15]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Drug metabolism is an essential clinical concern for the interprofessional healthcare team. Clinicians and pharmacists must work together to prevent clinically significant drug interactions that could affect patients' health.

In a hospital setting, nursing staff monitors for signs of a toxic buildup of metabolites or active drugs. This is especially significant in renal or hepatic insufficiency. In many cases, drugs such as aminoglycoside antibiotics, warfarin, and fluoroquinolones are dosed and monitored by pharmacists, who monitor serum levels of the drugs and renal function.

An interprofessional approach to drug dosing and administration in light of the effects of drug metabolism on patients, whether through impaired metabolism, drug-drug interactions, enzymatic induction, or other factors, provides the best potential for optimal patient care. The interprofessional care approach results in better therapeutic results with fewer adverse events. 

Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions

Interprofessional interventions and monitoring are critical for positive outcomes. Literature suggests that interprofessional interventions are effective when teams are open and willing to collaborate, communicate, share decision-making, and coordinate care, ultimately leading to the integration of the team’s competencies.[16]

Interprofessional team interventions are an effective part of medication management through interventions and monitoring. Medications affect people differently, as mentioned above. As a result, patients may be at an increased risk of adverse events if appropriate measures are not taken. Teams must monitor and intervene when medications are not safe for patients to take or administer or if patients are taking them inappropriately. The goal should always be patient safety. Reporting adverse events is crucial for interprofessional team monitoring. To properly conduct monitoring and interventions, clinical teams should also undergo training.

Training can be conducted on topics such as identifying medication errors to prevent adverse events, effective communication amongst teams, and standardization of medication dispensing. Continuing Medication Credits should be geared toward intervention and monitoring as well. Communication is a critical part of healthcare delivery. Interprofessional teams must continue to advance their approaches to following patients through the continuum of care.

In addition, effective interprofessional training allows for increased quality of care, promotion of collaboration, promote interdisciplinary awareness, respect, and acceptability of the role each discipline plays. However, one should also consider the challenges as well. Each discipline has its own culture and methodology. They have differences in routines, regulations, qualifications, accountability, and professional language. As a result, it makes it difficult to standardize any interventions or monitoring of medications. However, the first step in change is awareness of these challenges. Once these challenges are addressed and each discipline, whether nurses, pharmacists, or physicians, is trained appropriately, they will be able to effectively intervene and monitor medications for improved health outcomes at any stage of treatment.[17]

References


[1]

Wilde M, Pichini S, Pacifici R, Tagliabracci A, Busardò FP, Auwärter V, Solimini R. Metabolic Pathways and Potencies of New Fentanyl Analogs. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2019:10():238. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00238. Epub 2019 Apr 5     [PubMed PMID: 31024296]


[2]

Rizzieri D, Paul B, Kang Y. Metabolic alterations and the potential for targeting metabolic pathways in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Journal of cancer metastasis and treatment. 2019:5():. pii: 26. doi: 10.20517/2394-4722.2019.05. Epub 2019 Apr 3     [PubMed PMID: 31020046]


[3]

Garza AZ, Park SB, Kocz R. Drug Elimination. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 31613442]


[4]

Pascale A, Marchesi N, Govoni S, Coppola A, Gazzaruso C. The role of gut microbiota in obesity, diabetes mellitus, and effect of metformin: new insights into old diseases. Current opinion in pharmacology. 2019 Dec:49():1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Apr 20     [PubMed PMID: 31015106]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[5]

Azzam AAH, McDonald J, Lambert DG. Hot topics in opioid pharmacology: mixed and biased opioids. British journal of anaesthesia. 2019 Jun:122(6):e136-e145. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Apr 19     [PubMed PMID: 31010646]


[6]

Boyland E, Chasseaud LF. The role of glutathione and glutathione S-transferases in mercapturic acid biosynthesis. Advances in enzymology and related areas of molecular biology. 1969:32():173-219     [PubMed PMID: 4892500]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[7]

Bernhardt R. Cytochromes P450 as versatile biocatalysts. Journal of biotechnology. 2006 Jun 25:124(1):128-45     [PubMed PMID: 16516322]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[8]

Commandeur JN, Stijntjes GJ, Vermeulen NP. Enzymes and transport systems involved in the formation and disposition of glutathione S-conjugates. Role in bioactivation and detoxication mechanisms of xenobiotics. Pharmacological reviews. 1995 Jun:47(2):271-330     [PubMed PMID: 7568330]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[9]

Meyer UA, Zanger UM. Molecular mechanisms of genetic polymorphisms of drug metabolism. Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology. 1997:37():269-96     [PubMed PMID: 9131254]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[10]

Guengerich FP. Common and uncommon cytochrome P450 reactions related to metabolism and chemical toxicity. Chemical research in toxicology. 2001 Jun:14(6):611-50     [PubMed PMID: 11409933]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[11]

Bolton AE, Peng B, Hubert M, Krebs-Brown A, Capdeville R, Keller U, Seiberling M. Effect of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of imatinib mesylate (Gleevec, STI571) in healthy subjects. Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. 2004 Feb:53(2):102-6     [PubMed PMID: 14605865]


[12]

Colizzi M, Weltens N, McGuire P, Van Oudenhove L, Bhattacharyya S. Descriptive Psychopathology of the Acute Effects of Intravenous Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Administration in Humans. Brain sciences. 2019 Apr 25:9(4):. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9040093. Epub 2019 Apr 25     [PubMed PMID: 31027219]


[13]

Patilea-Vrana GI, Anoshchenko O, Unadkat JD. Hepatic Enzymes Relevant to the Disposition of (-)-∆(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Its Psychoactive Metabolite, 11-OH-THC. Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals. 2019 Mar:47(3):249-256. doi: 10.1124/dmd.118.085548. Epub 2018 Dec 19     [PubMed PMID: 30567877]


[14]

Baldo BA. Opioid analgesic drugs and serotonin toxicity (syndrome): mechanisms, animal models, and links to clinical effects. Archives of toxicology. 2018 Aug:92(8):2457-2473. doi: 10.1007/s00204-018-2244-6. Epub 2018 Jun 18     [PubMed PMID: 29916050]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[15]

Kotlinska-Lemieszek A, Klepstad P, Haugen DF. Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interactions Involving Medications Used for Symptom Control in Patients With Advanced Malignant Disease: A Systematic Review. Journal of pain and symptom management. 2019 May:57(5):989-998.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 16     [PubMed PMID: 30776538]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[16]

Sirimsi MM, De Loof H, Van den Broeck K, De Vliegher K, Pype P, Remmen R, Van Bogaert P. Scoping review to identify strategies and interventions improving interprofessional collaboration and integration in primary care. BMJ open. 2022 Oct 27:12(10):e062111. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062111. Epub 2022 Oct 27     [PubMed PMID: 36302577]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[17]

Bosch B, Mansell H. Interprofessional collaboration in health care: Lessons to be learned from competitive sports. Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC. 2015 Jul:148(4):176-9. doi: 10.1177/1715163515588106. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 26448769]