Back To Search Results

Acute Cardiac Tamponade

Editor: James R. Waymack Updated: 7/31/2023 8:36:41 PM

Introduction

The pericardium is a membrane surrounding the heart. It comprises an outer fibrous pericardium and an inner double-layered serous pericardium. Serous pericardium includes visceral layer and parietal layers, separated by the pericardial cavity containing 15 to 50 ml of plasma ultra-filtrate in healthy people. The pericardium mechanically protects the heart and reduces friction between the heart.[1][2] Pericardial diseases present as acute or chronic pericarditis, pericardial effusion, and cardiac tamponade. Pericarditis is a common disorder caused by inflammation of the pericardium. Acute pericarditis was reported in 5% of patients admitted to the emergency department[1] and 0.1% to 0.2% of hospitalized patients[2] for non-ischemic chest pain. Pericarditis can be divided into non-constructive and constrictive pericarditis. Pericarditis is commonly associated with pericardial effusion that can sometimes worsen to cardiac tamponade. Cardiac tamponade is a grave condition that happens after sudden and/or excessive accumulation of fluid in the pericardial space. The state restricts the appropriate filling of the cardiac chambers, disturbing normal hemodynamics, and ultimately causing hypotension and cardiac arrest.[3][4] This article reviews the etiology, signs and symptoms, diagnosis, and management of pericarditis and cardiac tamponade.

Etiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Etiology

The cause of pericarditis is mostly idiopathic which makes up around 90% of cases. Other causes are infections caused by viruses, bacteria or tuberculosis.  Other causes could include neoplasms, a connective tissue disorder, renal failure, post-myocardial infarction (also known as Dressler syndrome), open heart surgery (also known as the postpericardiotomy syndrome) and drugs, especially procainamide and hydralazine.[2]

Cardiac tamponade may be caused by the accumulation of pericardial fluid from either a transudate, exudate, or blood. Slow accumulation such as in infections such as tuberculosis or myocarditis, autoimmune diseases, neoplasms, uremia, and other inflammatory diseases are better tolerated than rapid accumulation as seen in hemorrhages such as from a penetrating wound to the heart, ventricular wall rupture after myocardial infarction (MI) or following a pacemaker insertion complication.[5]

Epidemiology

Acute pericarditis was reported in 0.1% to 0.2% of hospitalized patients for non-ischemic chest pain.[2] The prevalence of pericardial effusions is difficult to estimate because a good deal of may not be clinically significant.  The incidence or prevalence of pericardial effusions is estimated to be around 2 cases per 10,000 population. There is an increased prevalence in HIV-positive patients, end-stage renal disease, occult malignancies, tuberculosis, autoimmune diseases like lupus, or penetrating traumatic injury to the chest.[5]

Pathophysiology

Pathophysiology includes infections, autoimmune process (Dressler syndrome, postpericardiotomy syndrome), uremia, connective tissue disorder.  Most cases are idiopathic thought to be caused by a triggering of the inflammatory process resulting in inflammation of the pericardium which causes pericarditis.

Cardiac tamponade results from the rapid filling of fluid within the pericardium, leading to compression of the chambers of the heart, further resulting in decreased venous return, ventricular filling and decreased cardiac output. Pericarditis, autoimmune diseases or neoplasms often result in slow-growing effusions, that over time become large before leading to cardiac tamponade type of picture.[5]

History and Physical

Symptoms

Patients with pericarditis commonly present with sudden onset chest pain, which is pleuritic and classically improves when leaning forward and worsens when lying down. Patients with cardiac tamponade present with manifestations of cardiogenic or obstructive shock. They may endorse vague symptoms of chest pain, palpitations, shortness of breath, or in more severe cases, dizziness, syncope, and altered mental status. They may also present in a pulseless electrical activity cardiac arrest.

Signs

The classic physical findings in cardiac tamponade are included in Beck’s triad of hypotension, jugular venous distension, and muffled heart sounds. Pulses paradoxus, which is a decrease in systolic blood pressure by more than 10 mm Hg with inspiration is an important physical exam finding that suggests a pericardial effusion is causing cardiac tamponade. When fluid compresses the heart and impairs filling, the interventricular septum bows toward the left ventricle during inspiration due to increased venous return to the right side of the heart. This further decreases the left ventricle space leading to decreased left ventricular preload and stroke volume. The challenge with making the diagnosis of tamponade with clinical signs alone is difficult since they are neither sensitive nor specific.[5][6]

Evaluation

Evaluation of patients who are suspected of having pericarditis should begin with an electrocardiogram. Patients with pericarditis occasionally will have typical ECG changes that evolve through four stages. In stage I, patients develop diffuse concave up ST-segment elevation. This is often accompanied by PR-segment elevation in lead AVR as well. Stage II occurs within the first week, and shows normalization of ST and PR segment changes, while stage III, and stage IV are characterized by widespread T-wave inversions, followed by T-wave normalization.

Laboratory studies may be helpful when working up pericarditis.  A complete blood cell count may show a leukocytosis.  A basic metabolic profile may demonstrate elevated renal function tests supporting uremia as the cause of pericarditis or pericardial effusion.  The sedimentation rate and CRP are inflammatory markers which may help diagnose or track the progression of these conditions. 

Once a diagnosis of pericarditis is made or there is a concern for cardiac tamponade, a bedside echocardiogram should be performed to evaluate the extent of the effusion and look for signs of tamponade.  Evidence on echocardiogram supporting tamponade would include right ventricular collapse or bowing of the intraventricular septum.  If myocarditis is of concern computed tomography or cardiovascular magnetic MRI.

Treatment / Management

Acute pericarditis often responds to treating the underlying cause. High-dose NSAIDs, with or without colchicine, tapered down over weeks is the first-line treatment. High dose aspirin (ASA) should be used in the post-myocardial infarction Dressler syndrome. The response is often assessed clinically based on symptom relief. Corticosteroids are not recommended as first-line therapy in most patients as it can increase the risk of recurrent pericarditis. Patients on the corticosteroid for recurrent pericarditis, steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents (azathioprine or intravenous immunoglobulin) may be considered.[7]

The treatment of cardiac tamponade is pericardiocentesis.  During this procedure, a needle is advanced through the chest wall into the pericardium.  The procedure may be done blindly or with guidance from ultrasonography or fluoroscopy.  Hemodynamically unstable patients warrant the use of pericardiocentesis without imaging.  Surgical drainage is required if the heart cannot be reached by a needle, clotted hemopericardium, intrapericardial bleeding, or thoracic conditions that make needle drainage difficult or ineffective.[8]. Definitive treatment to prevent further occurrence is achieved with a pericardial window, a surgical procedure performed by a cardiothoracic surgeon.

Differential Diagnosis

The differential of cardiac tamponade would include other causes of obstructive or cardiogenic shock such as pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, Type A aortic dissection with extension into the pericardium or tension pneumothorax.   

In addition to the underlying causes of pericarditis discussed above, other causes of chest pain that should be considered when evaluating for pericarditis would include acute coronary syndrome, angina, peptic ulcer disease, gastritis or esophagitis.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses also play a vital role in managing the patients with acute pericarditis and cardiac tamponade. Their role includes medication adjustment, follow up at the pericardial clinic. They not only co-manage patients with the physicians by monitoring patients’ symptoms, inflammatory markers but also help in contacting patients through phone, titrating dosages of medications and arranging follow-up visits with an NP/PA in 3 months and with the physician every 6 months.

Media


(Click Video to Play)

Large Pericardial Effusion. This video shows the parasternal long-axis window of a large pericardial effusion that causes a cardiac tamponade. The anechoic fluid surrounds the beating heart, which floats and moves about within the pericardium.

Contributed by Emory Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Section.


(Click Video to Play)
Echocardiogram with apical four chamber view demonstrating a moderately large pericardial effusion with right atrial and right ventricular collapse consistent with cardiac tamponade Contributed by N.K. Choudhry, MD

References


[1]

Snyder MJ, Bepko J, White M. Acute pericarditis: diagnosis and management. American family physician. 2014 Apr 1:89(7):553-60     [PubMed PMID: 24695601]


[2]

Imazio M, Gaita F, LeWinter M. Evaluation and Treatment of Pericarditis: A Systematic Review. JAMA. 2015 Oct 13:314(14):1498-506. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12763. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 26461998]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[3]

Imazio M, Adler Y. Management of pericardial effusion. European heart journal. 2013 Apr:34(16):1186-97. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs372. Epub 2012 Nov 2     [PubMed PMID: 23125278]


[4]

Bodson L, Bouferrache K, Vieillard-Baron A. Cardiac tamponade. Current opinion in critical care. 2011 Oct:17(5):416-24. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283491f27. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 21716107]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[5]

Stashko E, Meer JM. Cardiac Tamponade. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 28613742]


[6]

Yacoub M, Quintanilla Rodriguez BS, Mahajan K. Constrictive-Effusive Pericarditis. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 30137863]


[7]

Imazio M, Gaita F. Diagnosis and treatment of pericarditis. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2015 Jul:101(14):1159-68. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306362. Epub 2015 Apr 8     [PubMed PMID: 25855795]


[8]

Spodick DH. Acute cardiac tamponade. The New England journal of medicine. 2003 Aug 14:349(7):684-90     [PubMed PMID: 12917306]