Definition/Introduction
A peripheral pulse refers to palpating the high-pressure wave of blood moving away from the heart through vessels in the extremities following systolic ejection. This phenomenon is often readily palpated and serves as a useful clinical tool, comprising one of the most commonly performed physical examination maneuvers at every level of medical care. Palpation occurs at various locations of the upper and lower extremities, including the radial, brachial, femoral, popliteal, posterior tibial, and dorsalis pedis arteries, and most commonly evaluates the rate, rhythm, intensity, and symmetry. Peripheral pulses can be used to identify many different types of pathology. Finally, modern medical technology allows for further evaluation of pulses beyond palpation, such as using Doppler ultrasound to characterize the pulse waveform.
Physiology
During ventricular systole, a high-amplitude wave of blood is ejected across the aortic valve towards the periphery. This high-pressure wave distends the arteries, especially compliant “elastic” or “conducting” arteries, which tend to be larger and closer to the heart. The subsequent release of that distention somewhat sustains the systolic wave of blood throughout the body, creating a spike followed by a downward-sloping plateau in a pulsatile waveform.
This waveform is propagated throughout the arterial system and can be felt and sometimes seen easily in several areas of the periphery. Higher pressures lead to greater palpated intensity as the peripheral vasculature distends more forcefully and to a higher degree. This phenomenon guides many clinical uses of the attribute of “intensity” when evaluating pulses.
Heart rate (HR) has several determinants. The baseline heart rate is higher in pediatric patients, is usually increased with exertion, and is affected by the respiratory cycle. The intensity of the peripheral pulse is affected by blood pressure and other physiological factors such as ambient temperature. For example, colder temperatures cause vasoconstriction leading to decreased intensity.[1] Outside the normal variation in rhythm that occurs with the respiratory cycle, the heart rate should be regular in the absence of pathology.
Pathological conditions can alter the rate, rhythm, intensity, and symmetry of the peripheral pulses, a fact that healthcare providers can exploit when evaluating a patient.
Physical Examination Technique
Pulses may be accurately measured when the clinician places their fingertips on the skin overlying the vessel and focuses on different aspects of the pulse. The traditional method of using only the fingertips and not the thumb during palpation is not supported by the reported literature.[2] If possible, the limb under evaluation should have support throughout palpation.
Evaluation of the peripheral pulse begins with an initial gestalt about whether the pulse is bounding or weak, fast or slow, irregular or regular, and equal or unequal bilaterally. The intensity of the pulse is noted and subjectively graded on a scale of 0 to 4. By convention, “plus” always follows the number (e.g., 1+). Zero refers to a nonpalpable pulse, 1+ is a barely detectable pulse, 2+ is slightly diminished but greater than 1+, 3+ is a normal pulse and should be easily palpable, and 4+ is “bounding” (stronger than usual).[1]
After noting intensity, the clinician will focus on the rhythm, feeling long enough to be certain that the only variation in rhythm may be the minor fluctuation that occurs with the respiratory cycle. Finally, the rate can be measured: the clinician observes a timepiece while counting the total number of palpable beats that occur during a predetermined amount of time. Generally, 15 seconds is the minimum acceptable time (multiplied by four to get the number of beats per minute), with more extended periods producing greater accuracy, particularly for irregular rhythms. If relevant, the clinician can auscultate the heart while palpating a peripheral pulse to ascertain if every pulse gets transmitted as a palpable beat.
The choice of where to palpate a peripheral pulse depends on factors including but not limited to the age of the patient, patient body habitus, and the clinical situation (e.g., resuscitation, routine vitals at an office visit, evaluation for peripheral arterial disease, etc.). In addition, it may be relevant to compare bilateral pulses for symmetry and the difference between upper and lower extremity pulses.
What follows will be a specific description of various peripheral pulses and where to find them. Diagrams can assist in learning where to find the pulses through palpation, and many can be found online, including in the citations for this article.[1] It is essential to recognize the presence of anatomic variation between patients; a clinician may encounter the physiologic absence of a particular pulse in an expected region. The carotid pulse is omitted from this discussion; although it is a significant pulse point, it is beyond the scope of an article focusing exclusively on peripheral pulses.
In the upper extremities, the two most commonly palpated peripheral pulses are those of the radial and brachial arteries. Examiners frequently evaluate the radial pulse during a routine examination of adults, as this pulse is easily accessible and palpation is unobtrusive. Like other distal peripheral pulses (such as those in the feet), the radial pulse may be quicker to show signs of pathology. Palpation is at the anterior wrist, just proximal to the base of the thumb. The brachial artery is often the site of evaluation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of infants. It is palpated proximal to the elbow between the medial epicondyle of the humerus and the distal biceps tendon. The carotid artery is the preferred pulse point used during the resuscitation of adults.
In the lower extremities, the commonly evaluated peripheral pulses are those of the femoral, posterior tibial, dorsalis pedis, and sometimes the popliteal arteries. The femoral pulse may be the most sensitive in septic shock assessment and is routinely checked during resuscitation.[3] It is palpated distal to the inguinal ligament less than halfway from the pubis to the anterior superior iliac spine. The posterior tibial pulse may be the most difficult to palpate, especially among less experienced clinicians.[4] It is located immediately posterior to the medial malleolus.[5] The dorsalis pedis is at the anterior aspect of the foot, lateral to the extensor hallucis tendon, and is generally within 1 cm of the bony prominence of the navicular bone.[6] Therefore, asking the patient to extend their first toe can help elevate this landmark and make the pulse easier to identify. However, it may be absent due to an anatomical variation in 10% of the general population.[1] Finally, the popliteal pulse is present in the popliteal fossa, slightly lateral of the midline.
In addition to manual palpation, medical technologies can detect pulse and study the waveform objectively. Some of the more commonly used technologies with this capability include Doppler ultrasound and arteriography, while other technologies for monitoring peripheral vasculature are also emerging.[5] Arteriography and ultrasound are two methods that can provide a discrete waveform. Doppler ultrasound is non-invasive, so it is often an option if the clinician cannot palpate a pulse manually.
Issues of Concern
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
- Search engine and full access to all medical articles
- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Issues of Concern
Palpation of peripheral pulses in a patient with strong systolic blood pressure in a controlled setting by an experienced clinician is an important and reliable physical examination skill. However, several studies show that when those ideal conditions degrade through the presence of pathology, time or environmental pressures, or clinician inexperience, the reliability of the maneuver decreases. In these cases, modern medical technology, as mentioned above, can assist in assessing peripheral pulses and determining the presence of pathology.
Clinical Significance
The heart rate can be obtained through many devices routinely applied to the body in most medical encounters, anywhere from the prehospital setting to the intensive care unit. While obtaining a heart rate is valuable, there are many instances in which recording the peripheral pulse is desirable and increases the quality of patient care. Peripheral pulses are clinically helpful in identifying specific vascular pathologies, including peripheral arterial disease, vasculitis, congenital abnormalities, and others.
Lower extremity peripheral pulses can effectively screen for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Traditionally, the screening tool for PAD is the ankle-brachial index (ABI), which compares the systolic blood pressure in the ankle to that in the arm. This test is somewhat time-consuming and requires specific equipment and training. However, a study has shown that when screening for PAD, if a patient has both pedal pulses intact bilaterally, the clinician could forgo ABI testing, as the likelihood of the patient having PAD, in that case, was less than 3.5%.[7] Other examples of intrinsic artery pathology affecting peripheral pulses include thrombosis or vasculitis, such as Takayasu arteritis.[1]
One important clinical use of peripheral pulse assessment occurs during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) when the pulse is used to quickly estimate systolic blood pressure. Palpable pulses in various locations probably relate to systolic blood pressure. The belief is that they are only palpable above certain systolic thresholds, with bigger and more central vessels having lower thresholds. One previous estimation was that the radial pulse is no longer palpable below 80 mm Hg systolic blood pressure, the femoral unpalpable below 70 mm Hg, and the carotid unpalpable below 60 mm Hg.[1] Although there have been recent doubts regarding these specific thresholds, there likely is a relationship.[6]
A general concept to bear in mind is that anything impinging the vessel can decrease peripheral pulses; impingements may be due to chronic changes, such as tumors growing in close proximity to the vessel, or may occur acutely in the setting of trauma. Peripheral pulses distal to an injury are routinely checked after extremity trauma to ensure that the distal limb is still receiving adequate blood supply and to evaluate for anatomical disturbance of flow. They require examination in cases of suspected compartment syndrome, with impingement occurring secondary to high pressures in the fascial compartment through which the vessel runs. It is crucial to note that pulselessness is an unreliable sign of compartment syndrome, although clinicians commonly use it for this purpose.[8]
The last two categories of pathology affecting peripheral pulses include vasospasm, as in the Raynaud phenomenon, and congenital anatomic abnormalities.[1] Peripheral pulses are part of a thorough physical examination used to asses for coarctation of the aorta. With 60 to 80% of infants going home undiagnosed with this condition after birth, there have been proposals for attention to this aspect of the physical examination in neonates as a possible means of improving patient care through increased detection of coarctation.[9]
Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions
Peripheral pulse observation and recording is a valuable assessment because of how quickly and easily they can be performed without specialized equipment or added cost. It is commonly used to continue evaluating patients who may have had trauma, sepsis, or other forms of shock, as well as a screening tool for pathologies such as PAD. Many clinical providers are trained to assess pulses, not just nurses and physicians but all those in the healthcare field who have taken a CPR course. Clear documentation of pulses is essential, indicating the location and laterality of the pulse, the results, and if it has changed from previous assessments. Sometimes peripheral pulses are marked with an "X" on the overlying skin, promoting continuity of care as different clinicians evaluate the patient over time.
Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Monitoring
Peripheral pulses are monitored in various clinical settings for several conditions, including where "limb checks" are needed. For example, if there is concern about the vascular supply to a specific extremity, pulses will be checked with some frequency. This is done for conditions including compartment syndrome, critical limb ischemia, and severe fractures. Peripheral pulses are also monitored and quantified routinely as one of the most basic and important vital signs.
References
Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW, Hill RD, Smith RB III. Examination of the Extremities: Pulses, Bruits, and Phlebitis. Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations. 1990:(): [PubMed PMID: 21250191]
Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW, Morris DC. The Carotid Pulse. Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations. 1990:(): [PubMed PMID: 21250154]
Deakin CD, Low JL. Accuracy of the advanced trauma life support guidelines for predicting systolic blood pressure using carotid, femoral, and radial pulses: observational study. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2000 Sep 16:321(7262):673-4 [PubMed PMID: 10987771]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceBrearley S, Shearman CP, Simms MH. Peripheral pulse palpation: an unreliable physical sign. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 1992 May:74(3):169-71 [PubMed PMID: 1616258]
Tibballs J, Weeranatna C. The influence of time on the accuracy of healthcare personnel to diagnose paediatric cardiac arrest by pulse palpation. Resuscitation. 2010 Jun:81(6):671-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.01.030. Epub 2010 Mar 15 [PubMed PMID: 20227813]
Hobson J, Bicknell C, Cheshire N. Dorsalis pedis arterial pulse: palpation using a bony landmark. Postgraduate medical journal. 2003 Jun:79(932):363 [PubMed PMID: 12840142]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceLondero LS, Lindholt JS, Thomsen MD, Hoegh A. Pulse palpation is an effective method for population-based screening to exclude peripheral arterial disease. Journal of vascular surgery. 2016 May:63(5):1305-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.11.044. Epub 2016 Mar 3 [PubMed PMID: 26947795]
McLaughlin N, Heard H, Kelham S. Acute and chronic compartment syndromes: know when to act fast. JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants. 2014 Jun:27(6):23-6. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000446999.10176.13. Epub [PubMed PMID: 24819953]
Cangussú LR, Lopes MR, Barbosa RHA. The importance of the early diagnosis of aorta coarctation. Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992). 2019 Feb:65(2):240-245. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.2.240. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30892450]
Dick WF,Eberle B,Wisser G,Schneider T, The carotid pulse check revisited: what if there is no pulse? Critical care medicine. 2000 Nov; [PubMed PMID: 11098941]
Naylor JF, Fisher AD, April MD, Schauer SG. An analysis of radial pulse strength to recorded blood pressure in the Department of Defense Trauma Registry. Military medicine. 2020 Dec 30:185(11-12):e1903-e1907. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa197. Epub [PubMed PMID: 32754740]