Back To Search Results

Lateral Epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow)

Editor: Matthew A. Varacallo Updated: 8/4/2023 5:20:21 PM

Introduction

Lateral epicondylitis, also commonly referred to as tennis elbow, describes an overuse injury secondary to an eccentric overload of the common extensor tendon at the origin of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) tendon. Tennis elbow primarily results from the repetitive strain caused by activities that involve loaded and repeated gripping and/or wrist extension. It is common in individuals who play tennis, squash, badminton, or any activity involving repetitive wrist extension, radial deviation, and/or forearm supination.[1][2]

Etiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Etiology

Tennis elbow is often an overuse injury primarily due to repetitive strain from tasks and activities that involve loaded and repeated gripping and/or wrist extension. It historically occurs in tennis players but can result from any sports that require repetitive wrist extension, radial deviation, and/or forearm supination. It is also seen in athletes who play squash and badminton, and other sports or activities that require similar movements. This condition is often precipitated by poor mechanics and technique or improper equipment in the athletic patient population.[3]

Epidemiology

Tennis elbow is the most common cause of elbow symptoms in patients presenting with elbow pain in general.  The condition tends to affect men and women equally. The annual incidence is one to three percent in the United States. Despite the condition being commonly referred to as tennis elbow, tennis players make up only 10% of the patient population. Half of all tennis players develop pain around the elbow, of which 75% represent true tennis elbow. It is more common in individuals older than 40 years of age. Smoking, obesity, repetitive movement for at least two hours daily, and vigorous activity (managing physical loads over 20 kg) are risk factors in the general population for developing this condition. The natural course of the condition is favorable, with spontaneous recovery within one to two years in 80% to 90% percent of the patients.[4][5][6]

Pathophysiology

This condition is primarily a degenerative overuse process of the extensor carpi radialis brevis and the common extensor tendon. Aside from degenerative changes, the histological findings include granulation tissue, micro-rupture, an abundance of fibroblasts, vascular hyperplasia, unstructured collagen, and a notable lack of traditional inflammatory cells (macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils) within the tissue. The term has been previously described as angiofibroblastic dysplasia based on multiple histologic studies describing its microscopic appearance and characteristics.[7][8] Ultrasound evaluation often reveals calcifications, intra-substance tears, marked irregularity of the lateral epicondyle, and thickening and heterogeneity of the common extensor tendon.[9]

Histopathology

Multiple studies reporting the histologic appearance of pathologic ECRB specimens characterize any combination of the following characteristics:[8]

  • Hypertrophic or abundant fibroblasts
  • Collagen disorganization
  • Vascular hyperplasia
  • Lack of inflammatory cells

History and Physical

Patients will typically report pain with an insidious onset, but upon further questioning, they will often relate an overuse history without a specific inciting traumatic event. The pain commonly occurs one to three days after an unaccustomed activity that involves repeated wrist extension.

The history may reveal new equipment use or an atypical workout circumstance such as an abnormally intense or prolonged workout in an athlete. This condition can also be precipitated by an acute injury or strain, such as lifting a heavy object or performing a hard backhand swing in tennis. This acute injury can lead to a more chronic process (i.e., acute-on-chronic overuse injury). The pain is usually over the lateral elbow that worsens with activity and improves with rest. The pain can vary from being mild, for example, with aggravating activities like tennis or the repeated use of a hand tool, or it can be such severe pain that simple activities like picking up and holding a coffee cup or a coffee cup sign will act as a trigger for the pain.

On examination, the point of maximal tenderness is usually over the lateral epicondyle, occasionally in a focal, distal location about 1 cm to 2 cm from the lateral epicondyle itself. The palpation of the entire tendon may have some degree and discomfort, and the connecting muscle may exhibit significant tightness. The patient’s pain will increase or be reproduced with resisted wrist extension, especially when the elbow is extended and the forearm is pronated. Resisted extension of the middle finger while the elbow is extended is particularly painful secondary to increased stress placed on the tendon, further supporting the diagnosis. Notably, there should be an absence of radicular symptoms or numbness/tingling. These symptoms suggest an alternative process such as radial nerve entrapment, although these conditions can coexist.[10]

Evaluation

Lateral epicondylitis is a clinical diagnosis, and imaging is often not necessary. A provider may consider obtaining an elbow radiographic series (anteroposterior and lateral) if other injuries or conditions are suspected by history and/or physical exam. Other conditions warranting potential imaging workup include evaluating concomitant degenerative joint changes, fractures, tumors, or bursitis. If the patient is not responding to nonoperative management modalities, the provider may consider ordering an MRI or ultrasound to evaluate for tears, stress fractures, or osteochondral defects.[11]

Treatment / Management

Nonoperative Management

First-line management for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis includes rest from offending activity as guided by the level of pain. Ice after activity and oral/topical NSAIDs can be used to help with pain control. Forearm counterforce straps are prescribed to relieve tension at the lateral epicondyle. These should be worn during activity. The role of counterforce straps is relatively controversial as some patients may report pain over the area of maximal tenderness secondary to direct mechanical compression on the area itself. Brace use in the form of a cock-up wrist splint can be prescribed to take the stress off of the wrist extensors.[10]

Occupational or physical therapy focusing on forearm stretching and strengthening and progression to eccentric muscle strengthening of the common extensor tendon has also shown to be helpful. If the pain does not respond to conservative measures, consider more advanced or invasive techniques such as topical nitrates, botulinum toxin, autologous platelet-rich plasma, and dextrose prolotherapy.

Surgical Management

Surgery should be considered as a last resort in the management of lateral epicondylitis. Prolonged nonoperative management (i.e., 6- to 12-months) should be attempted before considering surgical management.  Specific surgical techniques utilized vary throughout the literature. Most surgeons prefer varying degrees of ECRB debridement and/or release of the tendinous origin at the lateral epicondyle. In the setting of the surgeon electing to forego an actual ECRB detachment, a generous debridement should be performed at the ECRB origin with confirmation of debridement of the pathologic tissue and stimulation of a healthy, bleeding, bony bed of tissue at the lateral epicondyle to help stimulate healing potential.[12][13](A1)

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis for lateral epicondylitis includes but is not limited to any of the following conditions:[14]

  • Elbow bursitis
  • Cervical radiculopathy
  • Posterolateral elbow plica
  • Posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI)
  • Radial nerve entrapment
  • Radial tunnel syndrome
    • palpation 3 to 4 cm distal and anterior to the lateral epicondyle
    • pain with resisted third-finger extension
    • pain with resisted forearm supination
  • Occult fracture(s)
  • Capitellar osteochondritis dissecans
  • Triceps tendinitis
  • Radiocapitellar osteoarthritis
  • Shingles

Prognosis

The prognosis for lateral epicondylitis is generally good. Most patients will have pain relief within 12 months of conservative treatment (ice, rest, and anti-inflammatory medications). For patients who do not improve with initial treatment, various physical and occupational therapies can be helpful. Patients who fail to follow through on their therapy plan frequently have a recurrence of symptoms.

Complications

Complications of lateral epicondylitis can include recurrence of the injury when normal activity is resumed, rupture of the tendons with repeated steroid injections, and failure to improve conservative treatment.

Postoperative complications can include the following:

  • Failing to address concomitant pathology 
    • Patients report inferior outcomes and lack of improvement if the primary cause of symptoms is not addressed; patients should be educated regarding the risks and benefits of surgery; the former include but are not limited to infection, blood loss, neurovascular injury, continued pain, stiffness, or continued or worsening overall dysfunction. 
    • Radial nerve entrapment can be missed or not addressed clinically in up to 5% of patients being managed for lateral epicondylitis.
  • Iatrogenic LUCL injury
    • Occurs iatrogenically with increased risk if the surgical dissection extends beyond the radial head equator 
    • Postoperative iatrogenic posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) can develop if the extension or LUCL compromise is significant.
  • Iatrogenic neurovascular injury
    • Radial nerve injury
  • Heterotopic ossification
    • Decrease risk via copious saline irrigation following decortication and debridement
  • Infection

Deterrence and Patient Education

Patients need to receive counsel on prevention and biomechanical optimal movement pertaining to the elbow joint to prevent strain and overuse to the forearm and elbow. Key counseling points can include:

  • Avoid end range of motion extremes in both extension and flexion.
  • Avoid repetitive hand and wrist motions, and take breaks from such activities when necessary to perform them.
  • Avoid letting heavy items with the arm in full extension; perform work or weight-lifting partially bent with the elbow.
  • Use two hands to hold heavy tools, and use a two-handed backhand in tennis.
  • Limit repetitive grasping and gripping motions.
  • If a movement causes the pain to return, avoid it, and report to your clinician's office.

Pearls and Other Issues

After diagnosis, patient education, and a prescription for conservative treatment, patients can typically follow-up as needed. Sometimes more chronic cases will need additional follow-up to consider more advanced therapies. Posterior interosseous nerve entrapment (radial tunnel syndrome) may coexist in up to 15% of cases. Keep this diagnosis in mind as a coexisting condition or alternative diagnosis if radicular symptoms are present. Corticosteroid injections have demonstrated benefit in the short-term (less than six weeks) but ineffective in the long term.

Topical nitrates are thought to increase blood flow to the area and, as a result, promote healing to the tendon. There has been some suggestion that extracorporeal shockwave therapy can be used to treat this condition chronically. However, there have been no significant improvements using this therapy thus far. Although evidence has been mixed, platelet-rich plasma and dextrose prolotherapy are pro-inflammatory agents designed to cause inflammation or irritation to the tendon and trigger a healing response. Platelet-rich plasma seems to have better evidence to date as compared to dextrose prolotherapy. Most notably, patients with chronic pain due to this condition report decreased levels of pain and increased levels of functionality compared to corticosteroid injections.[15][16]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Tennis elbow is very common in society and can occur from many types of racquet sports, including golf. Most patients present to the primary care provider with pain around the elbow, and the key is patient education. One has to adopt good habits like stretching before taking part in intense physical activity. Also, when the pain comes on, it is important to rest the hand. Clinicians should emphasize the importance of improving muscle strength and conditioning. One must also use the proper equipment or toolage.

With rest, the majority of patients with tennis elbow improve within 3 to 18 months. Surgery is rarely required. [17]

References


[1]

Welsh P. Tendon neuroplastic training for lateral elbow tendinopathy: 2 case reports. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. 2018 Aug:62(2):98-104     [PubMed PMID: 30305765]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[2]

Kwapisz A, Prabhakar S, Compagnoni R, Sibilska A, Randelli P. Platelet-Rich Plasma for Elbow Pathologies: a Descriptive Review of Current Literature. Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine. 2018 Dec:11(4):598-606. doi: 10.1007/s12178-018-9520-1. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30255288]


[3]

Patiño JM, Corna AR, Michelini A, Abdon I, Ramos Vertiz AJ. Elbow Posterolateral Rotatory Instability due to Cubitus Varus and Overuse. Case reports in orthopedics. 2018:2018():1491540. doi: 10.1155/2018/1491540. Epub 2018 Aug 5     [PubMed PMID: 30174974]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[4]

Degen RM, Conti MS, Camp CL, Altchek DW, Dines JS, Werner BC. Epidemiology and Disease Burden of Lateral Epicondylitis in the USA: Analysis of 85,318 Patients. HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery. 2018 Feb:14(1):9-14. doi: 10.1007/s11420-017-9559-3. Epub 2017 Jun 5     [PubMed PMID: 29398988]


[5]

Chevinsky JD, Newman JM, Shah NV, Pancholi N, Holliman J, Sodhi N, Eldib A, Naziri Q, Zikria BA, Reilly JP, Barbash SE, Urban WP. Trends and Epidemiology of Tennis-Related Sprains/Strains in the United States, 2010 to 2016. Surgical technology international. 2017 Dec 22:31():333-338     [PubMed PMID: 29315449]


[6]

Hassebrock JD, Patel KA, Makovicka JL, Chung AS, Tummala SV, Hydrick TC, Ginn JE, Hartigan DE, Chhabra A. Elbow Injuries in National Collegiate Athletic Association Athletes: A 5-Season Epidemiological Study. Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine. 2019 Aug:7(8):2325967119861959. doi: 10.1177/2325967119861959. Epub 2019 Aug 8     [PubMed PMID: 31448298]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[7]

Kraushaar BS, Nirschl RP. Tendinosis of the elbow (tennis elbow). Clinical features and findings of histological, immunohistochemical, and electron microscopy studies. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 1999 Feb:81(2):259-78     [PubMed PMID: 10073590]


[8]

Nirschl RP, Pettrone FA. Tennis elbow. The surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 1979 Sep:61(6A):832-9     [PubMed PMID: 479229]


[9]

Jeon JY, Lee MH, Jeon IH, Chung HW, Lee SH, Shin MJ. Lateral epicondylitis: Associations of MR imaging and clinical assessments with treatment options in patients receiving conservative and arthroscopic managements. European radiology. 2018 Mar:28(3):972-981. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5084-5. Epub 2017 Oct 12     [PubMed PMID: 29027008]


[10]

Ramage JL, Varacallo M. Anatomy, Shoulder and Upper Limb, Wrist Extensor Muscles. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 30521226]


[11]

Nowotny J, El-Zayat B, Goronzy J, Biewener A, Bausenhart F, Greiner S, Kasten P. Prospective randomized controlled trial in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis with a new dynamic wrist orthosis. European journal of medical research. 2018 Sep 15:23(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40001-018-0342-9. Epub 2018 Sep 15     [PubMed PMID: 30219102]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[12]

Sirico F, Ricca F, DI Meglio F, Nurzynska D, Castaldo C, Spera R, Montagnani S. Local corticosteroid versus autologous blood injections in lateral epicondylitis: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine. 2017 Jun:53(3):483-491. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04252-0. Epub 2016 Sep 1     [PubMed PMID: 27585054]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[13]

Coombes BK, Bisset L, Vicenzino B. Management of Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: One Size Does Not Fit All. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy. 2015 Nov:45(11):938-49. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2015.5841. Epub 2015 Sep 17     [PubMed PMID: 26381484]


[14]

Buchanan BK, Maini K, Varacallo M. Radial Nerve Entrapment. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 28613749]


[15]

Chiavaras MM,Jacobson JA,Carlos R,Maida E,Bentley T,Simunovic N,Swinton M,Bhandari M, IMpact of Platelet Rich plasma OVer alternative therapies in patients with lateral Epicondylitis (IMPROVE): protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled study: a multicenter, randomized trial comparing autologous platelet-rich plasma, autologous whole blood, dry needle tendon fenestration, and physical therapy exercises alone on pain and quality of life in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Academic radiology. 2014 Sep     [PubMed PMID: 25022762]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[16]

Hegmann KT, Hoffman HE, Belcourt RM, Byrne K, Glass L, Melhorn JM, Richman J, Zinni P 3rd, Thiese MS, Ott U, Tokita K, Passey DG, Effiong AC, Robbins RB, Ording JA, American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. ACOEM practice guidelines: elbow disorders. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine. 2013 Nov:55(11):1365-74. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182a0d7ec. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 23963225]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[17]

Nishizuka T, Iwatsuki K, Kurimoto S, Yamamoto M, Onishi T, Hirata H. Favorable Responsiveness of the Hand10 Questionnaire to Assess Treatment Outcomes for Lateral Epicondylitis. The journal of hand surgery Asian-Pacific volume. 2018 Jun:23(2):205-209. doi: 10.1142/S2424835518500212. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29734897]