Tools
Thalamic Pain Syndrome
Introduction
Thalamic pain syndrome is an unfortunate outcome following a cerebrovascular accident (CVA). The pain experienced by the patient is centralized, neuropathic, and associated with temperature changes. Patients will often suffer from hyperalgesia and allodynia. The prevalence of thalamic pain syndrome following a stroke is relatively high at up to eight percent of cases. Despite being common following a stroke, diagnosis is often difficult. The onset of a patient’s symptoms is often delayed following a CVA. A patient with a history of a CVA of the thalamus may not experience significant pain until months or years after their stroke. Thalamic pain syndrome is now more commonly known as central post-stroke pain, while historically, it was known as Dejerine–Roussy syndrome. The nuances in these various terms are as follows. All cases of thalamic pain syndrome are a type of central post-stroke pain. However, not all cases of central post-stroke pain are thalamic in origin. A more accurate and broad definition of central post-stroke would be pain secondary to injury of the spinothalamic tract.
Thalamic pain syndrome is a term used interchangeably with centralized neuropathic pain. There is limited research complete for thalamic pain syndrome. There should be suspicion for thalamic pain syndrome in patients with a history of chronic and centralized pain and comorbid history of CVA. Treatment options are limited and vary in efficacy. Alternative and integrative approaches to treatment are recommended to help improve pain and quality of life. Pharmacological options include neuropathic pain medications and opioid analgesics. More invasive treatment options include deep brain stimulation, surgery, and neuromodulation. Given the complicated nature of thalamic pain syndrome, evaluation and treatment often require an interdisciplinary team that may consist of a neurologist, pain medicine specialist, or a neurosurgeon. Prognosis remains guarded. Providers must keep thalamic pain syndrome on their differential for all patients who have suffered a CVA and are complaining of symptoms of neuropathic pain.
Etiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Etiology
Thalamic pain syndrome most commonly occurs following a cerebrovascular accident. An isolated thalamic infarction is called a lacunar infarct. At the same time, a more expansive and extensive stroke typically derives its name after the more significant injured artery, such as a middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction. However, a thalamic lesion or abscess can also cause sensory deficits, similar to thalamic pain syndrome. Thalamic pain syndrome can occur both following an ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic stroke. The pain experienced in thalamic strokes is neuropathic.[1] Any injury to the thalamus can cause contralateral sensory deficits. Damage to the spinothalamic tract causes specific deficits in thermoregulation. The pain associated with thalamic pain syndrome can occur acutely following a stroke but also can occur in either the subacute period or years after the initial injury.[2]
The role of the thalamus is to act as a relay station for all sensory information within the brain except smell. Peripherally we are exposed to sensory information within our environment, and this information goes from our peripheral nervous system to our central nervous system (CNS). As the information reaches the CNS, it arrives in the thalamus. The thalamus acts as a way of decoding information and processing it. After it reaches the thalamus, it goes to the somatosensory cortex. Within the cortex, the information is interpreted. In the case of thalamic pain syndrome, this process becomes damaged. Our sensory processing is lost, and we lose the ability to interpret tactile information accurately. Tactile information should not be painful at temperatures or at applied pressures that do not damage tissue. Pain should not be a symptom unless there is an acute injury. The afferent pathway from the thalamus to the cortex no longer functions correctly in central post-stroke pain. The sensory information received by the thalamus is interpreted differently. Tactile stimuli become painful or painful stimuli are amplified and made worse.[3][4][5][6] When ordinary touch reproduces the pain, it is called allodynia, and when potentially painful stimuli are worse than expected, the patient is experiencing hyperalgesia.
Thalamic pain syndrome is a type of centralized pain. In centralized pain, the origin of the area of pain is stemming from the central nervous system. Central sensitization of pain occurs when the patient's nervous system is persistently in a state of high activity. A persistently activated state decreases sensitivity to fire action potentials. An increase in firing of action potential leads to an amplification of neural signaling. Patients become hypersensitive to pain. This state of high alert is commonly known as the wind-up; clinically, it is known as temporal summation.
To make the diagnosis of thalamic pain syndrome, the patient's pain is not attributable to a peripheral source. Any stroke along the spinothalamic tract can be suggestive of thalamic pain syndrome. Specifically, infarction of the ventral posterior nuclei of the thalamus is more likely to be associated with centralized post-stroke pain.[7] There are a reduced number of opiate receptors within the thalamus, that may contribute to enhanced pain perception in cases of post-stroke pain, once the thalamus is damaged.[8][9][10] Hypersensitivity of the remaining nerves along the spinothalamic tract is a possible explanation of pain following infarction, secondary to microglial activation, leading to chronic activation.[11][12] Autonomic instability contributes to lower skin temperature in the areas of reported pain in patients with central post-stroke pain. Stress has also shown to worse pain.[13]
Epidemiology
There are 700000 cases of CVA in the United States each year. Of those cerebrovascular infarctions, there are an estimated 56,000 cases of central post-stroke pain annually.[14] Thalamic stroke represents 20% to 33% of cases of centralized post-stroke pain.[15][16] Central post-stroke pain presents in the recovery phase of cerebral infarction.[7] Prevalence of post-stroke pain is up to eight percent of patients following a CVA and eleven percent of patients, who are over the age of 80.[4] Central post-stroke pain is more likely to occur from thalamic strokes and lateral medullary infarcts than any other area.[17][18][19] For thalamic pain syndrome, 17% to 18% of cases occur in the inferior-lateral aspect of the thalamus.[5] Part of what makes the diagnosis of central post-stroke pain so difficult is under 40 percent of patients develop pain, immediately following a stroke.[13] The majority of patients with thalamic pain syndrome develop pain within a month of their stroke. An estimated 18 percent of patients develop pain within the first six months after a stroke, while 18 percent of patients do not develop symptoms until six months following a CVA.[5] Patients develop pain following a stroke up to one to six years post-stroke.
The mechanism of cerebrovascular injury seen in post-stroke pain is the same as the percentage of cases of CVA's, with eighty percent of CVAs being ischemic, and eighty percent of cases of thalamic pain syndrome secondary to ischemic strokes.[20] According to a 2004 study from the United Kingdom, the incidence of central post-stroke pain was between 2000 and 6000 patients. The estimated prevalence was closer to 20000 patients.[21]
Central post-stroke pain symptoms occur equally in various demographics. Seventy-four percent of patients endorse increased pain gradually rather than sudden onset following a CVA. Furthermore, there are no significant differences in sex or previous stroke history between patients with sensory deficits with and without pain.[22][15][23] However, different studies suggest there may be an age discrepancy between patients who develop pain following a stroke and those who do not. One major study did not show an age difference, while two studies showed an age discrepancy. Patients who experience post-stroke pain were young by greater than ten years, compared to patients with only sensory deficits.[24][21]
Chronic pain following a stroke is widespread, with over 40 percent of patients meeting the criteria for the diagnosis of central post-stroke pain four years after their stroke. Comparatively, only 7.3% of patients diagnosed with chronic pain attribute it secondary to central post-stroke pain.[25] Right-sided infarctions are more commonly associated with central post-stroke pain than left-sided infarctions. The right hemisphere of the brain is integral for pain mediation.[7]
Pathophysiology
Please refer to the StatPearls article on Dejerine Roussy Syndrome for detailed pathophysiology.[26]
History and Physical
The diagnosis of thalamic pain syndrome, and more broadly, central post-stroke pain has its basis on history and physical examination. The history of the pain should include its onset, description, location, radiation, quality, and severity. Following a thalamic stroke, the patient may begin to experience numbness or tingling on the contralateral side of their injury. The pain is typically the entire contralateral half of the patient's body.[27] Over time, they may begin to report a burning sensation. Freezing or scalding sensation are symptoms the patient may complain of when they experience thermal dysregulation. The burning pain can range in severity but can be debilitating. The pain can change in severity throughout the day. Thus it is crucial to gauge the significance of the pain on the patient's quality of life.[13] The patient endorsed is often severe, constant, or intermittent pain, made worse by touching or palpating the side of the body, opposite the infarction. [4] The majority of patients complain of constant pain. However, 15 percent of patients report pain only once daily.
Pain may be poorly localized and may change over time.[28] Allodynia, dysaesthesia, and hyperalgesia are all signs of centralization of the patient's pain. Allodynia is the most common symptom following central post-stroke pain, with over two-thirds of patients complaining of allodynia or diffuse pain to mild palpation. Allodynia is considered pathognomonic for central post-stroke pain. Burning pain associated with cold stimuli is also suggestive of the diagnosis.[13] Separately, an estimated 40 percent of patients will experience hyperalgesia.[13][29] Symptoms of centralized neuropathic pain also include unexplained itching following a stroke and a searing type sensation.[30] Symptoms often centralization occurs after twelve weeks of symptoms. Interestingly, thalamic pain syndrome has associations with anosognosia and somatoparaphrenia, the denial or lack of awareness of their injury, and the denial of ownership of the injured parts of their body, respectively. Centralized pain correlates with mood changes, fatigue, cognitive disturbances, sleep changes, and pain catastrophizing, as well.[31]
A full neurological exam is necessary and a part of the initial evaluation of a patient following up after a CVA. The findings on gross sensory examination are often normal in an isolated thalamic stroke. However, difficulty in interpreting temperature for patients to interpret does occur in the thalamic pain syndrome. Spinothalamic tract dysfunction is a requirement for the development of central neuropathic pain. A full assessment of all post-stroke sequelae is needed. A thalamic stroke can be focal, but it also can be a part of a much larger CVA. Thus muscle strength sensation, cranial nerves, balance, and speech should be assessed, at a minimum. Depending on the extent of the stroke, a full musculoskeletal exam may be necessary.
On exam, the area of reported pain is colder than an unaffected area. The patient's pinprick and temperature sensation are impaired, while their proprioception and vibration sensation is intact.[13] The disruption of thermal or pinprick sensation can be complete or partial.[21] If a patient's pinprick and temperature sensation are intact, it is unlikely that secondary to central post-stroke pain.[32][33] Pain coordinates with the area of sensory loss. Temperature changes are more pathogenic than pinprick changes for central post-stroke pain.[15] When normal palpation pressure reproduces the pain, the examiner should record it as such.[34]
Evaluation
Diagnostic criteria for central post-stroke pain, according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition (ICHD-3), require all of the following; facial and head pain within six months following either an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. It also requires imaging, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrating a vascular lesion at an appropriate site. Another source cannot explain the pain. Counter to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, many cases of central post-stroke pain occur after six months from onset.
Imaging can help to rule out other possible diagnoses and to confirm the history of a thalamic stroke for controversial cases. MRI can be helpful in the interpretation of a thalamic infarction following a stroke. The larger the infarction, the more damage and the poorer the prognosis.[35] Imaging will show decreased blood flow to the thalamus in the infarcted area.[36] No specific further evaluation is needed if neurological symptoms are chronic and stable, and there is a confirmed history of a thalamic stroke. If the patient is presenting with new-onset neurological symptoms concerning a CVA, an urgent non-contrast computed tomogram (CT) of the head is necessary.
Furthermore, if the patient had a recent CVA repeat, CT or MRI head may be necessary to assess for changes to brain function, hemorrhagic conversion, and worsening edema. The development of comorbid seizure-like activity following the stroke warrants an electroencephalogram (EEG) and neurological consultation. If the patient does not have a known history of CVA and complains of symptoms suggestive of thalamic pain syndrome, further evaluation for multiple sclerosis (MS) could be warranted as well. Evaluation for MS would likely include an MRI of the brain and spinal cord with contrast.
Treatment / Management
Traditional treatment for chronic pain and centralized pain include antidepressants, convulsants, and opioid analgesics. A systematic review and meta-analysis showed limited evidence for the use of amitriptyline, opioids, anticonvulsants, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and acupuncture in the treatment of central post-stroke pain.[37] Physical therapy should merits consideration as an adjunct treatment following an infarction. Deep brain stimulation is a possible treatment option for refractory cases. Radiation therapy is another viable treatment option for refractory cases of central post-stroke pain.[38] Cognitive-behavioral therapy is useful in the prevention of depression in patients following a CVA.[39] Case reports have shown the effectiveness of acupuncture in post-stroke pain, but no extensive studies have taken place. Also, cases of cold water vestibular caloric stimulation have had favorable results in the treatment of central post-stroke pain.[13](A1)
First-line therapy for central post-stroke pain includes desensitization of the tactile stimulus, causing pain. Amitriptyline has been the most widely studied drug in the treatment of central post-stroke pain. Furthermore, trazodone and venlafaxine are also considerations. SSRI antidepressants are generally ineffective, but results are mixed.[13] Second-line treatment includes anticonvulsants. Gabapentin, pregabalin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, and lamotrigine have all been studied for central post-stroke pain. Opioid analgesics, clonidine, mexiletine, and beta-blockers have all been used in post-stroke pain syndromes.[40] Intravenous infusions of lidocaine, naloxone, and propofol, as well as intrathecal baclofen and ketamine, have also been studied.
Evidence suggests lamotrigine is the most effective anticonvulsant in the treatment of central post-stroke pain. Amitriptyline is more effective in patients with spinal cord injury and comorbid depression. There have been mixed results in multiple studies regarding the efficacy of pregabalin and gabapentin in central post-stroke-related pain and central pain related to spinal cord injuries.[41][42][43][44] Studies have not been done directly on duloxetine and its effect on central post-stroke pain, however, duloxetine is effective in multiple sclerosis-related neuropathies.[45] Similar results were shown with cannabinoids.[46][47] The addition of mexiletine to antidepressants can be part of pharmacological therapy. Relaxation therapy should also be a part of adjunctive treatment.[21] Oral drug therapies have generally been ineffective.[29][28] Modafinil is an option for post-stroke fatigue for patients experiencing symptoms for greater than three months. Modafinil is effective in both reducing fatigue while improving quality of life.[48] (A1)
Interestingly, intravenous lidocaine does work term analgesia for up to 45 minutes after an infusion in patients with central post-stroke pain. A similar injection was used with naloxone showed mixed results. Sympathetic chain anesthetic blocks can also be complete if less invasive therapies prove to be ineffective. Anesthetic blocks provide short-term pain relief. Infusion of ketamine can significantly reduce pain in patients with central pain.[49] Reoccuring electrical stimulation of the Gasserian ganglion provides up to 50 percent relief in patients with central post-stroke facial pain.[50] Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) has demonstrated mixed results, improving pain in some patients while making it worse in others.(A1)
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is another treatment option. A single, small study for TMS was complete on patients with central post-stroke pain. The results showed a modest improvement in the patient's pain at four weeks following the intervention.[51] Motor cortex stimulation success was reported by up to a 77 percent success rate in one study. [52] Motor cortex stimulation is an effective treatment modality, especially in patients complaining of facial pain.[53][54] Deep brain and motor cortex stimulation are other treatment options. Deep brain stimulation has had conflicting results, while motor cortex stimulation is effective in roughly one-third of patients with central post-stroke pain.[55][56] Deep brain stimulation is less effective for central neuropathic pain compared to other types of pain. However, deep brain stimulation can be an effective treatment modality in the short term in 50 to 70 percent of patients with central post-stroke pain.[57][58][59][60][61] (B2)
Spinal cord stimulators improve pain in 50% of patients with central post-stroke pain. Of the patients who had a spinal cord stimulator installed, about one-third had pain relief 28 months following the procedure.[55] Neurosurgery is often the last resort, but thalamotomy is an option to deactivate the source of the patient’s pain. Thalamotomy and mesencephalic tractotomy improve allodynia. Dorsal root entry zone lesioning is also done in some cases. However, there is a very high recurrence rate at two years following the procedure.[28] Surgery is most effective if the patient is experiencing paroxysmal shooting-type pains.[62] The effect of pain relief following spinal cord stimulation for central pain disorders decreases over time.[63][64][65](B2)
Differential Diagnosis
Many diagnoses can appear similar to thalamic pain syndrome. However, in the setting of a history and physical suggestive of central post-stroke pain, these various diagnoses become less likely. The differential diagnosis for thalamic pain syndrome includes chronic pain syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome, and syringomyelia. The differential also includes centralized pain syndrome, lateral medullary infarction, multiple sclerosis, idiopathic peripheral neuropathy, and brain mass.
- Centralized pain syndrome
- Chronic pain syndrome
- Complex regional pain syndrome
- Idiopathic peripheral neuropathy
- Lateral medullary infarction
- Multiple sclerosis
- Syringomyelia
Prognosis
Prognosis is typically poor. Up to five percent of patients experience moderate to severe pain following a cerebral infarction.[4] Once post-stroke pain develops, the character, as well as the severity of the patient’s pain, will be persistent and often unchanging. There are limited treatment options, and the efficacy of various treatment options is mixed at best. If treatment does not work, unfortunately, symptoms can persist indefinitely. Early identification of pain following a stroke, and initiation of therapy, have been shown to have more favorable outcomes. However, rarely does this mean the resolution of pain. An estimated 50% of patients report some pain relief with medications.[21] A study of central post-stroke pain showed significant or complete resolution of patients' pain following antidepressant therapy initiation.[21] However, this is typically not the case. Of patients with sensory changes following a stroke, 18 percent will have associated pain, specifically with cold and warm stimuli. Following a cerebrovascular infarct, patients endorsing pain and sensory deficits are much more likely to experience allodynia or dysesthesia. Only three percent of patients with only sensory deficits following a CVA experienced allodynia, while 88 percent of patients with post-stroke pain endorse it.[15]
Complications
Persistent pain will decrease the quality of the patient's life. Furthermore, increased rates of depression. Multiple complications associated with CVA, not specific to thalamic pain syndrome. Medical complications of a stroke include frequent falls, urinary tract infections, and chest infections such as pneumonia. The development of pressure sores and depression are also common concerns following a CVA.[66] An estimated 29 percent of patients develop depression following a stroke.[67] The incidence of major depression increases significantly in the first two years following a stroke.[68] Patients with a CVA and comorbid stroke demonstrate worse outcomes and mortality, while remission of said depression, improves outcomes following a stroke.[69][70][71] The suicide attempt and completion rates, double following a stroke.[72] When taking a history of patients with central post-stroke pain, it is essential to assess their significance of physical disability, prior history of comorbidities such as depressive depression, level of cognitive impairment, as well as their family and social support.[69] Post-stroke fatigue is also significant to discuss. The prevalence is very variable, occurring between 23 to 75 percent of patients following a stroke.[73][74][75]
Deterrence and Patient Education
Patients should understand that if they are experiencing pain following a stroke, they should see a primary care provider. Thalamic pain syndrome or central post-stroke pain can occur when there are disruptions of one of the pathways of the brain that affects the sensation of temperature. There can be burning or tingling pain. Also, significant discomfort with temperature changes is a concern for thalamic pain syndrome following a stroke.
Strokes can contribute to the development of chronic pain. Difficulty sleeping, the development of depression, and loss of independence all contribute to post-stroke pain. Chronic pain is associated with allodynia or pain to nonpainful stimulus, as well as hyperalgesia or increased pain with a painful stimulus. Treatment of thalamic pain may require the expertise of a specialist. There is not a single best treatment for thalamic pain syndrome. Furthermore, to achieve the best treatment results for thalamic pain, the focus of therapy should be an improvement in the patient’s quality of life.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
Managing thalamic pain syndrome requires an interprofessional team of healthcare professionals that includes primary care physicians, physician assistants, pharmacists, physical and occupational therapists, cognitive-behavioral therapists, and several physicians in different specialists, including pain medicine physicians, neurologists, neurosurgeons, and specialty care nurses. Without exceptional management, the morbidity from thalamic pain syndrome. Once thalamic pain is identified, either immediately following a CVA, or weeks to years after a stroke, coordinating the care is critical and includes the following:
- Following a stroke, a patient should see their primary care provider.
- If a patient develops new-onset neurological symptoms following a CVA, a CT or MRI is warranted
- The development of chronic pain following a CVA is concerning for central post-stroke pain. If the pain is associated with temperature sensitivities, it is suggestive of thalamic pain syndrome.
- Patients with post-stroke pain often require pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies. Pharmacological therapy should involve a clinical pharmacist, who can assist in therapy selection, monitor dosing, and counsel both patients and team members on side effects.
- The primary care provider can manage the symptoms of thalamic pain syndrome but may consider a referral to a neurologist for their expertise in handling this syndrome.
- A pain medicine specialist may also be necessary to combat the complicated nature of thalamic pain.
- When all other therapies have failed, neurosurgery should be a consideration.
- Opioid analgesics are a second or third-line treatment option for patients who develop central poststroke pain. The side effects, signs, and symptoms of opioid intoxication should have close monitoring.
- All post-stroke sequelae require optimization in the setting of thalamic pain syndrome. Patients often require physical, speech, and occupational therapy, as well as home health nursing.
- Lastly, comorbid depression should be monitored closely and treated appropriately. Patients can benefit from cognitive behavioral therapy.
The management of post-stroke pain is often a life-long endeavor. The sequella of a cerebrovascular accident is challenging to manage even without the addition of chronic pain. Only by working as an interprofessional team can the morbidity of thalamic pain syndrome be decreased. The long-term outcomes for pain relief and improvement of the patient's quality of life remain guarded. [Level 5]
References
Cai Q, Guo Q, Li Z, Wang W, Zhang W, Ji B, Chen Z, Liu J. Minimally invasive evacuation of spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage by transcranial neuroendoscopic approach. Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment. 2019:15():919-925. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S195275. Epub 2019 Apr 11 [PubMed PMID: 31043783]
Kim JS. Pure sensory stroke. Clinical-radiological correlates of 21 cases. Stroke. 1992 Jul:23(7):983-7 [PubMed PMID: 1615549]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceQuiton RL, Masri R, Thompson SM, Keller A. Abnormal activity of primary somatosensory cortex in central pain syndrome. Journal of neurophysiology. 2010 Sep:104(3):1717-25. doi: 10.1152/jn.00161.2010. Epub 2010 Jul 21 [PubMed PMID: 20660417]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceKlit H, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS. Central post-stroke pain: clinical characteristics, pathophysiology, and management. The Lancet. Neurology. 2009 Sep:8(9):857-68. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70176-0. Epub [PubMed PMID: 19679277]
Flaster M, Meresh E, Rao M, Biller J. Central poststroke pain: current diagnosis and treatment. Topics in stroke rehabilitation. 2013 Mar-Apr:20(2):116-23. doi: 10.1310/tsr2002-116. Epub [PubMed PMID: 23611852]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceHansson P. Post-stroke pain case study: clinical characteristics, therapeutic options and long-term follow-up. European journal of neurology. 2004 Apr:11 Suppl 1():22-30 [PubMed PMID: 15061821]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceNasreddine ZS, Saver JL. Pain after thalamic stroke: right diencephalic predominance and clinical features in 180 patients. Neurology. 1997 May:48(5):1196-9 [PubMed PMID: 9153442]
Willoch F, Schindler F, Wester HJ, Empl M, Straube A, Schwaiger M, Conrad B, Tölle TR. Central poststroke pain and reduced opioid receptor binding within pain processing circuitries: a [11C]diprenorphine PET study. Pain. 2004 Apr:108(3):213-220. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.08.014. Epub [PubMed PMID: 15030940]
Jones AK, Watabe H, Cunningham VJ, Jones T. Cerebral decreases in opioid receptor binding in patients with central neuropathic pain measured by [11C]diprenorphine binding and PET. European journal of pain (London, England). 2004 Oct:8(5):479-85 [PubMed PMID: 15324779]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceSprenger T, Berthele A, Platzer S, Boecker H, Tölle TR. What to learn from in vivo opioidergic brain imaging? European journal of pain (London, England). 2005 Apr:9(2):117-21 [PubMed PMID: 15737798]
Wasner G, Lee BB, Engel S, McLachlan E. Residual spinothalamic tract pathways predict development of central pain after spinal cord injury. Brain : a journal of neurology. 2008 Sep:131(Pt 9):2387-400. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn169. Epub 2008 Jul 31 [PubMed PMID: 18669485]
Wasner G. Central pain syndromes. Current pain and headache reports. 2010 Dec:14(6):489-96. doi: 10.1007/s11916-010-0140-8. Epub [PubMed PMID: 20690002]
Bowsher D. Central post-stroke ('thalamic syndrome') and other central pains. The American journal of hospice & palliative care. 1999 Jul-Aug:16(4):593-7 [PubMed PMID: 10661067]
Fatahzadeh M, Glick M. Stroke: epidemiology, classification, risk factors, complications, diagnosis, prevention, and medical and dental management. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics. 2006 Aug:102(2):180-91 [PubMed PMID: 16876060]
Andersen G, Vestergaard K, Ingeman-Nielsen M, Jensen TS. Incidence of central post-stroke pain. Pain. 1995 May:61(2):187-193. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00144-4. Epub [PubMed PMID: 7659428]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceLeijon G, Boivie J. Central post-stroke pain--a controlled trial of amitriptyline and carbamazepine. Pain. 1989 Jan:36(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90108-5. Epub [PubMed PMID: 2465530]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceMacGowan DJ, Janal MN, Clark WC, Wharton RN, Lazar RM, Sacco RL, Mohr JP. Central poststroke pain and Wallenberg's lateral medullary infarction: frequency, character, and determinants in 63 patients. Neurology. 1997 Jul:49(1):120-5 [PubMed PMID: 9222179]
Bowsher D. Central pain: clinical and physiological characteristics. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 1996 Jul:61(1):62-9 [PubMed PMID: 8676164]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceBowsher D, Leijon G, Thuomas KA. Central poststroke pain: correlation of MRI with clinical pain characteristics and sensory abnormalities. Neurology. 1998 Nov:51(5):1352-8 [PubMed PMID: 9818859]
Hirtz D, Thurman DJ, Gwinn-Hardy K, Mohamed M, Chaudhuri AR, Zalutsky R. How common are the "common" neurologic disorders? Neurology. 2007 Jan 30:68(5):326-37 [PubMed PMID: 17261678]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceBowsher D. The management of central post-stroke pain. Postgraduate medical journal. 1995 Oct:71(840):598-604 [PubMed PMID: 8545288]
Boivie J, Leijon G, Johansson I. Central post-stroke pain--a study of the mechanisms through analyses of the sensory abnormalities. Pain. 1989 May:37(2):173-185. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90128-0. Epub [PubMed PMID: 2748190]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceVestergaard K, Nielsen J, Andersen G, Ingeman-Nielsen M, Arendt-Nielsen L, Jensen TS. Sensory abnormalities in consecutive, unselected patients with central post-stroke pain. Pain. 1995 May:61(2):177-186. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00140-A. Epub [PubMed PMID: 7659427]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceLeijon G, Boivie J, Johansson I. Central post-stroke pain--neurological symptoms and pain characteristics. Pain. 1989 Jan:36(1):13-25. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90107-3. Epub [PubMed PMID: 2919091]
Klit H, Finnerup NB, Andersen G, Jensen TS. Central poststroke pain: a population-based study. Pain. 2011 Apr:152(4):818-824. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.12.030. Epub 2011 Jan 26 [PubMed PMID: 21272999]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceJahngir MU, Qureshi AI. Dejerine-Roussy Syndrome. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 30085589]
Ramachandran VS, McGeoch PD, Williams L, Arcilla G. Rapid relief of thalamic pain syndrome induced by vestibular caloric stimulation. Neurocase. 2007 Jun:13(3):185-8 [PubMed PMID: 17786778]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceNicholson BD. Evaluation and treatment of central pain syndromes. Neurology. 2004 Mar 9:62(5 Suppl 2):S30-6 [PubMed PMID: 15007162]
Backonja MM, Serra J. Pharmacologic management part 2: lesser-studied neuropathic pain diseases. Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.). 2004 Mar:5 Suppl 1():S48-59 [PubMed PMID: 14996229]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceBowsher D. Allodynia in relation to lesion site in central post-stroke pain. The journal of pain. 2005 Nov:6(11):736-40 [PubMed PMID: 16275597]
Henry JL, Lalloo C, Yashpal K. Central poststroke pain: an abstruse outcome. Pain research & management. 2008 Jan-Feb:13(1):41-9 [PubMed PMID: 18301815]
O'Connor AB, Schwid SR, Herrmann DN, Markman JD, Dworkin RH. Pain associated with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and proposed classification. Pain. 2008 Jul:137(1):96-111. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.024. Epub 2007 Oct 24 [PubMed PMID: 17928147]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceTruini A, Galeotti F, La Cesa S, Di Rezze S, Biasiotta A, Di Stefano G, Tinelli E, Millefiorini E, Gatti A, Cruccu G. Mechanisms of pain in multiple sclerosis: a combined clinical and neurophysiological study. Pain. 2012 Oct:153(10):2048-2054. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.05.024. Epub 2012 Jul 11 [PubMed PMID: 22789132]
Kondo I, Hosokawa K, Soma M, Iwata M, Maltais D. Protocol to prevent shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2001 Nov:82(11):1619-23 [PubMed PMID: 11689984]
Misra UK, Kalita J, Kumar B. A study of clinical, magnetic resonance imaging, and somatosensory-evoked potential in central post-stroke pain. The journal of pain. 2008 Dec:9(12):1116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.06.013. Epub 2008 Oct 10 [PubMed PMID: 18848810]
Coloigner J, Batail JM, Commowick O, Corouge I, Robert G, Barillot C, Drapier D. White matter abnormalities in depression: A categorical and phenotypic diffusion MRI study. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2019:22():101710. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101710. Epub 2019 Feb 4 [PubMed PMID: 30849644]
Mulla SM, Wang L, Khokhar R, Izhar Z, Agarwal A, Couban R, Buckley DN, Moulin DE, Panju A, Makosso-Kallyth S, Turan A, Montori VM, Sessler DI, Thabane L, Guyatt GH, Busse JW. Management of Central Poststroke Pain: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Stroke. 2015 Oct:46(10):2853-60. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010259. Epub 2015 Sep 10 [PubMed PMID: 26359361]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceHayashi M, Chernov MF, Taira T, Ochiai T, Nakaya K, Tamura N, Goto S, Yomo S, Kouyama N, Katayama Y, Kawakami Y, Izawa M, Muragaki Y, Nakamura R, Iseki H, Hori T, Takakura K. Outcome after pituitary radiosurgery for thalamic pain syndrome. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2007 Nov 1:69(3):852-7 [PubMed PMID: 17570607]
Hackett ML, Anderson CS, House A, Halteh C. Interventions for preventing depression after stroke. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2008 Jul 16:(3):CD003689. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003689.pub3. Epub 2008 Jul 16 [PubMed PMID: 18646094]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceAwerbuch GI, Sandyk R. Mexiletine for thalamic pain syndrome. The International journal of neuroscience. 1990 Dec:55(2-4):129-33 [PubMed PMID: 2084039]
Levendoglu F, Ogün CO, Ozerbil O, Ogün TC, Ugurlu H. Gabapentin is a first line drug for the treatment of neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. Spine. 2004 Apr 1:29(7):743-51 [PubMed PMID: 15087796]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceRintala DH, Holmes SA, Courtade D, Fiess RN, Tastard LV, Loubser PG. Comparison of the effectiveness of amitriptyline and gabapentin on chronic neuropathic pain in persons with spinal cord injury. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2007 Dec:88(12):1547-60 [PubMed PMID: 18047869]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceKim JS, Bashford G, Murphy KT, Martin A, Dror V, Cheung R. Safety and efficacy of pregabalin in patients with central post-stroke pain. Pain. 2011 May:152(5):1018-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.12.023. Epub 2011 Feb 12 [PubMed PMID: 21316855]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceVranken JH, Dijkgraaf MG, Kruis MR, van der Vegt MH, Hollmann MW, Heesen M. Pregabalin in patients with central neuropathic pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a flexible-dose regimen. Pain. 2008 May:136(1-2):150-7 [PubMed PMID: 17703885]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceVollmer TL, Robinson MJ, Risser RC, Malcolm SK. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of duloxetine for the treatment of pain in patients with multiple sclerosis. Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain. 2014 Nov:14(8):732-44. doi: 10.1111/papr.12127. Epub 2013 Oct 24 [PubMed PMID: 24152240]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceSvendsen KB, Jensen TS, Bach FW. Does the cannabinoid dronabinol reduce central pain in multiple sclerosis? Randomised double blind placebo controlled crossover trial. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2004 Jul 31:329(7460):253 [PubMed PMID: 15258006]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceRog DJ, Nurmikko TJ, Friede T, Young CA. Randomized, controlled trial of cannabis-based medicine in central pain in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2005 Sep 27:65(6):812-9 [PubMed PMID: 16186518]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceBivard A, Lillicrap T, Krishnamurthy V, Holliday E, Attia J, Pagram H, Nilsson M, Parsons M, Levi CR. MIDAS (Modafinil in Debilitating Fatigue After Stroke): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Trial. Stroke. 2017 May:48(5):1293-1298. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016293. Epub 2017 Apr 12 [PubMed PMID: 28404841]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceEide PK, Stubhaug A, Stenehjem AE. Central dysesthesia pain after traumatic spinal cord injury is dependent on N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activation. Neurosurgery. 1995 Dec:37(6):1080-7 [PubMed PMID: 8584148]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceTaub E, Munz M, Tasker RR. Chronic electrical stimulation of the gasserian ganglion for the relief of pain in a series of 34 patients. Journal of neurosurgery. 1997 Feb:86(2):197-202 [PubMed PMID: 9010419]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceHasan M, Whiteley J, Bresnahan R, MacIver K, Sacco P, Das K, Nurmikko T. Somatosensory change and pain relief induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with central poststroke pain. Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society. 2014 Dec:17(8):731-6; discussion 736. doi: 10.1111/ner.12198. Epub 2014 Jun 17 [PubMed PMID: 24934719]
Tsubokawa T, Katayama Y, Yamamoto T, Hirayama T, Koyama S. Chronic motor cortex stimulation for the treatment of central pain. Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum. 1991:52():137-9 [PubMed PMID: 1792954]
Rasche D, Ruppolt M, Stippich C, Unterberg A, Tronnier VM. Motor cortex stimulation for long-term relief of chronic neuropathic pain: a 10 year experience. Pain. 2006 Mar:121(1-2):43-52 [PubMed PMID: 16480828]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceBrown JA, Pilitsis JG. Motor cortex stimulation for central and neuropathic facial pain: a prospective study of 10 patients and observations of enhanced sensory and motor function during stimulation. Neurosurgery. 2005 Feb:56(2):290-7; discussion 290-7 [PubMed PMID: 15670377]
Aly MM, Saitoh Y, Hosomi K, Oshino S, Kishima H, Yoshimine T. Spinal cord stimulation for central poststroke pain. Neurosurgery. 2010 Sep:67(3 Suppl Operative):ons206-12; discussion ons212. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000382965.95819.73. Epub [PubMed PMID: 20679928]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceSokal P, Harat M, Zieliński P, Furtak J, Paczkowski D, Rusinek M. Motor cortex stimulation in patients with chronic central pain. Advances in clinical and experimental medicine : official organ Wroclaw Medical University. 2015 Mar-Apr:24(2):289-96. doi: 10.17219/acem/40452. Epub [PubMed PMID: 25931362]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceLevy R, Deer TR, Henderson J. Intracranial neurostimulation for pain control: a review. Pain physician. 2010 Mar-Apr:13(2):157-65 [PubMed PMID: 20309382]
Nardone R, Höller Y, Leis S, Höller P, Thon N, Thomschewski A, Golaszewski S, Brigo F, Trinka E. Invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation for treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a review. The journal of spinal cord medicine. 2014 Jan:37(1):19-31. doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000140. Epub 2013 Nov 26 [PubMed PMID: 24090372]
Kumar K, Toth C, Nath RK. Deep brain stimulation for intractable pain: a 15-year experience. Neurosurgery. 1997 Apr:40(4):736-46; discussion 746-7 [PubMed PMID: 9092847]
Boccard SGJ, Prangnell SJ, Pycroft L, Cheeran B, Moir L, Pereira EAC, Fitzgerald JJ, Green AL, Aziz TZ. Long-Term Results of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Cingulate Cortex for Neuropathic Pain. World neurosurgery. 2017 Oct:106():625-637. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.173. Epub 2017 Jul 11 [PubMed PMID: 28710048]
Bittar RG, Kar-Purkayastha I, Owen SL, Bear RE, Green A, Wang S, Aziz TZ. Deep brain stimulation for pain relief: a meta-analysis. Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia. 2005 Jun:12(5):515-9 [PubMed PMID: 15993077]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceSindou M, Mertens P, Wael M. Microsurgical DREZotomy for pain due to spinal cord and/or cauda equina injuries: long-term results in a series of 44 patients. Pain. 2001 May:92(1-2):159-71 [PubMed PMID: 11323137]
Siddall PJ, Loeser JD. Pain following spinal cord injury. Spinal cord. 2001 Feb:39(2):63-73 [PubMed PMID: 11402361]
Tasker RR, DeCarvalho GT, Dolan EJ. Intractable pain of spinal cord origin: clinical features and implications for surgery. Journal of neurosurgery. 1992 Sep:77(3):373-8 [PubMed PMID: 1506884]
Cioni B, Meglio M, Pentimalli L, Visocchi M. Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of paraplegic pain. Journal of neurosurgery. 1995 Jan:82(1):35-9 [PubMed PMID: 7815131]
Langhorne P, Stott DJ, Robertson L, MacDonald J, Jones L, McAlpine C, Dick F, Taylor GS, Murray G. Medical complications after stroke: a multicenter study. Stroke. 2000 Jun:31(6):1223-9 [PubMed PMID: 10835436]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceAyerbe L, Ayis SA, Crichton S, Wolfe CD, Rudd AG. Natural history, predictors and associated outcomes of anxiety up to 10 years after stroke: the South London Stroke Register. Age and ageing. 2014 Jul:43(4):542-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft208. Epub 2013 Dec 26 [PubMed PMID: 24375225]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceJørgensen TS, Wium-Andersen IK, Wium-Andersen MK, Jørgensen MB, Prescott E, Maartensson S, Kragh-Andersen P, Osler M. Incidence of Depression After Stroke, and Associated Risk Factors and Mortality Outcomes, in a Large Cohort of Danish Patients. JAMA psychiatry. 2016 Oct 1:73(10):1032-1040. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1932. Epub [PubMed PMID: 27603000]
Towfighi A, Ovbiagele B, El Husseini N, Hackett ML, Jorge RE, Kissela BM, Mitchell PH, Skolarus LE, Whooley MA, Williams LS, American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Poststroke Depression: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2017 Feb:48(2):e30-e43. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000113. Epub 2016 Dec 8 [PubMed PMID: 27932603]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceChemerinski E, Robinson RG, Kosier JT. Improved recovery in activities of daily living associated with remission of poststroke depression. Stroke. 2001 Jan:32(1):113-7 [PubMed PMID: 11136924]
House A, Knapp P, Bamford J, Vail A. Mortality at 12 and 24 months after stroke may be associated with depressive symptoms at 1 month. Stroke. 2001 Mar:32(3):696-701 [PubMed PMID: 11239189]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceEriksson M, Glader EL, Norrving B, Asplund K. Poststroke suicide attempts and completed suicides: a socioeconomic and nationwide perspective. Neurology. 2015 Apr 28:84(17):1732-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001514. Epub 2015 Apr 1 [PubMed PMID: 25832661]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceHinkle JL, Becker KJ, Kim JS, Choi-Kwon S, Saban KL, McNair N, Mead GE, American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing and Stroke Council. Poststroke Fatigue: Emerging Evidence and Approaches to Management: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association. Stroke. 2017 Jul:48(7):e159-e170. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000132. Epub 2017 May 25 [PubMed PMID: 28546322]
De Doncker W, Dantzer R, Ormstad H, Kuppuswamy A. Mechanisms of poststroke fatigue. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 2018 Mar:89(3):287-293. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-316007. Epub 2017 Sep 22 [PubMed PMID: 28939684]
Kutlubaev MA, Duncan FH, Mead GE. Biological correlates of post-stroke fatigue: a systematic review. Acta neurologica Scandinavica. 2012 Apr:125(4):219-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2011.01618.x. Epub 2011 Nov 10 [PubMed PMID: 22070461]
Level 1 (high-level) evidence