Back To Search Results

Anatomy, Abdomen and Pelvis: Umbilical Cord

Editor: Brody J. Lipsett Updated: 7/24/2023 11:54:40 PM


The umbilical cord is considered both the physical and emotional attachment between mother and fetus. This structure allows for the transfer of oxygen and nutrients from the maternal circulation into fetal circulation while simultaneously removing waste products from fetal circulation to be eliminated maternally. On the other hand, mothers associate an emotional connection to the fetus through the cord. It may merit consideration as the route of love and care during pregnancy. Thus, some poets call it the string of life. 

The umbilical cord is a bundle of blood vessels that develops during the early stages of embryological development. It is enclosed inside a tubular sheath of amnion and consists of two paired umbilical arteries and one umbilical vein. During development, the umbilical arteries have a vital function of carrying deoxygenated blood away from the fetus to the placenta.[1] However, after birth, a significant distal portion of the umbilical artery degenerates. These remnants later obliterate, forming the medial umbilical ligament.[2] At the same time, the proximal portion of each umbilical artery serves as a branching point for the development of the anterior internal iliac arteries. The internal iliac arteries later give rise to the superior vesical arteries that supply the urinary bladder and ureters as well as the ductus deferens and seminal vesicles in males.[3][4] The umbilical cord is a vital structure for the entire period of development since it functions to tether the fetus to the placenta and the uterine wall while also acting as the primary route to enable blood to circulate between the fetus and placenta.[5]

Structure and Function

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Structure and Function

Anatomical Features of an Umbilical Cord

The umbilical cord is a soft, tortuous cord with a smooth outer covering of amnion. It extends from the umbilicus of the fetus to the center of the placenta. Its length ranges from 50 cm to 60 cm, with a diameter of about 1 cm.[6] The umbilical cord is composed of a gelatinous ground substance called Wharton's jelly or substantia gelatinea funiculi umbilicalis. It is composed of mucopolysaccharides from the conjugation of hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulfate. As previously mentioned, three vessels comprise the umbilical cord: two umbilical arteries and one umbilical vein. It also encloses the urachus (a remnant of allantois).[7] The urachus is a fibrous remnant of the allantois that extends through the umbilical cord and is located in the space of Retzius between the peritoneum posteriorly and the transverse fascia anteriorly. The urachus serves as a drainage canal for the urinary bladder of the fetus.[8]


The umbilical arteries carry deoxygenated blood from fetal circulation to the placenta. The two umbilical arteries converge together about at 5 mm from the insertion of the cord, forming a type of vascular connection called the Hyrtl's anastomosis.[9] The primary function of Hartl's anastomosis is to equalize blood flow and pressure between the umbilical and placental arteries.[10] As the arteries enter the placenta, each bifurcates into smaller branches called the chorionic vessels.


During the early stages of embryonic development, gastrulation occurs and differentiates germinal tissues into three distinct layers: outer ectoderm, intra-embryonic mesoderm, and inner endoderm.[11] The formation of the umbilical cord occurs over three stages and coincides with the gastrulation process. 

I. Formation of the Primitive Umbilical Ring

This developmental stage happens together with the folding of the embryonic disc. During this stage, the embryonic disc bulges into the amniotic cavity as a result of folding. At the same time, the amnio-ectodermal junction, which is the tight connection between the embryonic amnion and the ectodermal layer, becomes the ventral aspect of the embryo. Then, the line of reflection between the amnion and the ectoderm acquires an oval outline called the primitive umbilical ring.

II. Formation of the Primitive Umbilical Cord

This stage of development starts in the fifth week of pregnancy, during which the primitive umbilical ring constricts to form a tubular sheath. The tubular sheath is called the primitive umbilical cord. It encloses the body stalk, the yolk sac, and its vessels, as well as a part of the allantois. 

III. Formation of the Definitive Umbilical Cord

During this stage, the umbilical cord elongates, and its fundamental structures undergo primary changes. For instance, The extraembryonic mesoderm of the body stalk starts to differentiate into a mucoid substance called Wharton's jelly. Wharton's jelly develops gradually and forms the main bulk of the umbilical cord. The remnants of the extraembryonic coelom inside the umbilical cord progressively degenerate. The yolk sac becomes obliterated together with the vitellointestinal duct that connects the yolk sac with the midgut. Similarly, the distal part of the allantois becomes obliterated. However, the allantoic vessels persist and elongate to form the umbilical vessels. Finally, during the sixth week, a part of the midgut loop enters the umbilical cord developing a physiological hernia. That physiological hernia is usually corrected when that part of the midgut returns to the abdominal cavity after the tenth week of pregnancy.[12]

Blood Supply and Lymphatics

The umbilical cord, together with the placenta, contributes to the flow and regulation of fetal circulation. The two umbilical arteries arise from the internal iliac arteries of the fetus and enter the umbilical cord before further branching at the level of the placenta. At the placental level, each umbilical artery bifurcates into smaller arterioles that continue to branch further to distribute blood to the chorionic villi. The capillaries of the villi fuse to form venules that converge to form the umbilical vein. The umbilical vein carries oxygenated blood and nutrients from the mother to the fetus.[13]

As fetal growth ensues, both placental intervillous circulation and umbilical circulation develop gradually, until maturation is complete at the end of the first trimester. At midgestation, the percentage of umbilical blood in fetal circulation is about 30% of the fetal cardiac output. During the last trimester of pregnancy, umbilical blood flow declines significantly as it becomes inversely proportional to the fetal weight measured in kilograms. That percentage decreases considerably during the last trimester till it reaches less than 20%. The umbilical vein enters the abdominal region of the fetus. It carries the oxygenated blood with nutrients to the fetal liver parenchyma and ductus venosus. Then, blood flows to the inferior vena cava and foramen ovale of the fetal heart.[14]

On the other hand, the role and distribution of lymphatic drainage for the placenta, as well as the umbilical cord, has been scarcely discussed in scientific resources. However, recent research has shown D2-40 expression at the level of placental stromal has a vital role in the fetal lymphatic drainage. This expression links to podoplanin-expressing cells whose function is related to forming a lymphatic-like reticular network. The thinking is that those cells are responsible for providing lymphatic drainage for the umbilical cord and the placenta.[15]


The umbilical cord lacks intrinsic and extrinsic innervations during all stages of embryonic development. Vasoactive substances secreted locally within the umbilical vessels wall or carried through the fetal circulation are responsible for regulating the smooth muscle tension within the umbilical vasculature. For instance, nitrous oxide and prostacyclin play an essential role in maintaining the low vascular resistance within the umbilical and placental circulation. Furthermore, catecholamines are primary contributors for vasoconstriction of the umbilical vessels immediately after parturition.[16]


The bulk of the umbilical cord consists of Wharton's jelly since it does not have any voluntary skeletal muscles. However, the umbilical vasculature has several smooth muscle layers of various compositions and thicknesses. The walls of umbilical vessels consist mainly of three layers: tunica externa, tunica media, and tunica interna.

Tunica externa

Also referred to as the tunica adventitia, it is the outermost layer of the umbilical vessels that consists of fibrous and elastic connective tissue with varying amounts of collagen and elastic fibers. The connective tissue of this layer is quite dense near the tunica media. It transitions to loose connective tissue as it extends toward the periphery of the umbilical vessels. The umbilical arteries have denser connective tissue in their tunica externa compared to that of the umbilical vein.[17]

Tunica media

This section is the intermediate layer within the wall of the umbilical vessels. It represents the muscular bulk of the vessels and consists mainly of smooth muscle. It provides structural support for the vessels. It is also responsible for changing the diameter of the umbilical vessels. Thus, it contributes primarily to regulate blood flow and blood pressure. It is commonly the thickest layer within the vascular wall. It is much thicker in the umbilical arteries compared to the umbilical vein. Moreover, tunica media of the umbilical arteries contain well-defined internal and external elastic membranes that may be less defined or absent in the umbilical vein wall.[18]

Tunica interna

Also called the tunica intima, it is the innermost layer of the umbilical vasculature. It is composed of simple squamous epithelium resting on a basement membrane consists of connective tissue rich in elastic fibers. Those layers together form the endothelium of the umbilical vessels. The tunica interna of the umbilical vein contains valves that direct the blood flow in one direction and prevent its regurgitation in the opposite direction. Those valves are absent in the wall of the umbilical arteries.[19] 

Physiologic Variants

Umbilical Cord Coiling Patterns

One of the most common morphological variations of the umbilical cord is its different helical coiling patterns. The degree of coiling is measured by the umbilical cord index (UCI). Commonly, the umbilical cord coiling pattern has a UCI of 0.2 coil/cm. The rope model is considered the most common pattern of umbilical cord coiling. On the other hand, hyper-coiling of the umbilical cord is defined as having a UCI greater than 0.3 coil/cm and a relatively high incidence of about 6% to 21% of all pregnancies.[20] Also, the umbilical cord can coil in an undulating pattern that has a relatively high incidence compared to other coiling patterns, such as segmented or linked coiling of the umbilical cord. It was found clinically that abnormal coiling of the umbilical cord is closely associated with the fetal vascular obstruction, which in its role can eventually lead to fetal thrombi,  avascular villi or villous stromal vascular karyorrhexis that commonly occur with segmented coiling pattern of the umbilical cord [21].

False Knots of the Umbilical Cord

False knots are bulging masses located on the surface of the umbilical cord. Sometimes, excessive torsion of the umbilical cord inside the uterus can cause these bulging masses to appear as knots on uterine ultrasonography grossly. The knot appearance of this condition forms via the excessive accumulation of Wharton's Jelly bulks alternating with areas with relatively less amount of jelly composing constrictions after each bulging. Hence, they were identified as false knots of the umbilical cord. This physiologic variation does not affect the stability of the fetal position, nor does it affect umbilical blood flow and pressure. Thus, false knots do not represent a considerable risk to the fetus.[22]

Single Umbilical Artery

The incidence of having a single umbilical artery is very low overall. However, It is known to be more common in multiparous females compared to nulliparous ones. Many studies have reported that the left umbilical artery is more often absent than the right.[23] The side of umbilical artery absence has very minimal significance with the exception that one study concluded that infants with a single umbilical artery identified by ultrasound in utero had reported the presence of congenital abnormalities, including cardiac, renal, intestinal, and skeletal anomalies when the left umbilical artery was absent.[23][24][25][26][27] Also, it is noted that the incidence of urinary tract infection is higher in infants with a single umbilical artery.[28]

Surgical Considerations

Anesthetic Considerations

Placental and umbilical blood flow impact fetal oxygen delivery. Myometrial tone and maternal blood pressure have a direct correlation with uterine artery blood flow. Volatile anesthetics usually decrease myometrial tone and tend to reduce maternal blood pressure. Subsequently, there is a decrease in fetal oxygenation due to a reduction in placental blood flow. Maintenance of patent umbilical arteries and baseline maternal arterial blood pressure is essential for maintaining sound cardiac output for the fetus. For example, maternal hypercapnia leads to fetal hypoxia and metabolic acidosis as a result of umbilical venous flow reduction. Similarly, maternal hypocapnia should be avoided during all maternal or fetal procedures since it has a direct correlation with fetal hypoxia. Consequently, inhalation anesthesia is the best option for fetal and intrauterine procedures. Moreover, epidural anesthesia plays a critical role in the prevention of premature labor during the postoperative period of maternal surgeries.[29]

Intravenous Administration/Catheterization 

The umbilical vein is considered the primary site for cannulation. The umbilical vein remains open for approximately one week after labor, and it can be useful for administering intravenous fluids and medications for newborns requiring more aggressive resuscitation efforts. The umbilical vein has a larger lumen than the umbilical arteries due to its thinner tunica media—catheterization through the umbilical vein to the ductus venosus. Finally, the catheter arrives at the inferior vena cava below the right atrium.[30] Furthermore, umbilical artery lines may also be used for resuscitative efforts during the first week after delivery. Umbilical artery catheterization is routinely used for direct access to monitor arterial blood gas, arterial blood pressure, and angiography. In the neonatal intensive care, umbilical artery catheterization is typically used to provide blood samples for laboratory testings.[31]

Clinical Significance

Different types of umbilical cord abnormalities may be potentially fatal or pose a severe threat to fetal health. Thus, it is of great clinical significance to have early detection of these malformations to be able to provide a proper diagnosis and plan of care. 

Velamentous Insertion

The incidence of velamentous insertion of the umbilical cord is significantly high for in vitro fertilization(IVF)-induced pregnancies compared to naturally-conceived pregnancies. It happens in about 10% of pregnancies and 20% of IVF pregnancies.[32] Velamentous insertion of the umbilical cord occurs when the placental end of the umbilical cord consists of umbilical arteries and vein surrounded by fetal membranes without Wharton's jelly. The exact reason for this condition is still unclear. However, the most current hypothesis suggests that during IVF pregnancy, half of the placenta undergoes excessive proliferation making the site of the insertion of the umbilical cord move peripherally away from its center. Conversely, the other pole of the placenta involutes and the umbilical cord becomes unable to follow the migration of the placenta. This condition casts risk for the fetus during delivery.[33]

Four-Vessel Umbilical Cord

Normal umbilical cord anatomy consists of three vessels represented by two umbilical arteries and one umbilical vein. By the seventh week of gestation, the right umbilical vein usually obliterates, leaving a single (left) umbilical vein patent. However, there have been documented cases of umbilical cords containing four-vessels. The persistence of two umbilical veins and two umbilical arteries within the umbilical cord is associated with multiple cardiovascular and gastrointestinal anomalies.[34] When both the right and left umbilical veins remain open, a condition called persistent right umbilical vein (PRUV). This condition usually happens due to a deficiency in folic acid during the first trimester of pregnancy. This condition may cause teratogenic effects for the fetus and act as a risk factor for its overall physical health.[35]

True Knots of the Umbilical Cord

These are real tangling nodules of the umbilical vessels along the length of the umbilical cord. They usually occur early in pregnancy as a result of various predisposing factors. Most commonly, the development of true knots is associated with the presence of excessive amniotic fluid, causing high pressure on the umbilical cord vessels, increasing their torsional force, causing deep knots of those vessels. Also, an increase in the movement of the fetus in utero plays a vital role in creating that teratogenic deformity as supercoils of the umbilical cord can cause it to knot over itself. True knot deformities of the umbilical cord are very dangerous because they may obstruct the blood flow in the umbilical vessels, which may eventually lead to fetal demise.[36]

Very Short Umbilical Cord

An umbilical cord is considered significantly short when its length is less than approximately 40 cm. A short umbilical cord can lead to premature separation from the placenta resulting in an interruption in fetal circulation and, as a result, intrauterine bleeding followed by fetal death.[37]

Very Long Umbilical Cord

If an umbilical cord is longer than 65 to 70 cm, it is clinically considered long. An abnormally long umbilical cord has the greater potential wind around the neck of the fetus multiple times contribute to fetal death, or it may also protrude from the mother's cervix.[37]


Also referred to as exomphalos, an omphalocele is an abdominal wall defect that causes the herniation of bowel and sometimes other organs into the umbilical cord. The pathophysiology behind this condition is due to the failure of the reduction of the physiological umbilical hernia.[38] Surgical correction is considered for such conditions to prevent intestinal obstruction of the neonate. 

Abnormal attachment of the umbilical cord to the placenta

Sometimes, the umbilical cord may have an abnormal attachment site on the placenta. For example, the umbilical cord may attach to the placenta significantly off-center, giving rise to eccentric attachment deformity. The placenta may take a deformed shape called battledore placenta. This deformity results from the marginal attachment of the umbilical cord to the placenta.[39] It closely correlates with abnormal hyper-coiling of the umbilical cord in most cases. 

Delayed Umbilical Cord Separation

Normal separation of the umbilical cord can occur anytime after delivery with no reliable, constant timeline. However, generally speaking, separation of the umbilical cord is considered delayed if it happens later than the first three weeks after delivery. There are many factors and pathological conditions associated with the incidence of delayed cord separation. For instance, the topical application of antibiotics, alcohol, and triple dye after delivery has a significant contribution to delayed cord separation. Moreover, pathological conditions such as; infections, immune disorders, and the presence of urachal remnants can also delay umbilical cord separation. Interestingly, researchers found a correlation between each low birth weight, cesarian delivery, and prematurity and the increased risk of delayed umbilical cord separation. It is clinically significant to consider further workup in newborns with delayed umbilical cord separation and skin infections or those with persistent urachal remnants. These infants most likely have an underlying immunologic disorder.[40]

Umbilical Cysts

Cysts classify into two main categories: true cysts and pseudocysts. They usually occur near or around the insertion of the cord into the fetal umbilicus. Umbilical cord cysts generally develop during the first trimester with a standard resolution by the end of the twelfth week of gestation. Umbilical cysts have an incidence of 3.4% of all pregnancies. The exact etiology of umbilical cysts is not defined clinically. However, they appear to be closely related to chromosomal abnormalities, including trisomies of chromosomes 13 and 18, imperforate anus, and angiomyxoma of the cord.[41] The most frequently encountered type of cyst is a pseudocyst. Pseudocysts are also known as Wharton's jelly cysts. They lack epithelial tissue and occur commonly as a result of focal edema of Wharton's jelly. Also, they can develop as a result of mucoid degeneration inside the cord. It is not uncommon to see single cysts or multiple focal lesions. The diameter of these lesions is less than 2 cm approximately.

On the contrary, true cysts of the umbilical cord develop commonly from the omphalomesenteric duct or other primitive embryonic structures, including the allantois. True cysts have a distinct epithelial lining; hence they are known as true cysts.[42] In general, umbilical cysts are considered clinically significant. They serve as an early indicator of chromosomal abnormalities, especially if cysts persist during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Thus, fetal karyotyping and amniocentesis are useful diagnostic procedures to determine any underlying conditions associated with them.

Umbilical Granuloma

An umbilical granuloma is a red nodule that may develop after the umbilical cord has separated from the naval of a newborn. On average, the diameter of a granuloma is about five mm.[40] The development of this lesion involves an abnormal proliferation of fibroblasts at the umbilicus forming thick layers of granulation tissue and endothelium. The vessels enclosed within the lesion have a dotted or strawberry-like appearance.[43] The mainstay of treatment is chemical cauterization with silver nitrate. Extra caution is needed to avoid injury or chemical burns of the surrounding skin. However, it is of great clinical significance to provide further evaluation of persistent umbilical granulomas as they can be mistaken for polyps that may require surgical removal. 


(Click Image to Enlarge)
<p>Development of the Fetal membrane and the Placenta, Diagram illustrating a later stage in the development of the umbilical

Development of the Fetal membrane and the Placenta, Diagram illustrating a later stage in the development of the umbilical cord, Placental villi, Umbilical cord, Allantois, Heart, Embryo

Henry Vandyke Carter, Public Domain, via Wikimedia Commons

(Click Image to Enlarge)
<p>Development of Fetal Membranes and Placenta, Fetus in utero; between fifth and sixth months, Umbilical cord, Cervix uteri<

Development of Fetal Membranes and Placenta, Fetus in utero; between fifth and sixth months, Umbilical cord, Cervix uteri

Henry Vandyke Carter, Public Domain, via Wikimedia Commons

(Click Image to Enlarge)
<p>The Branchial Region, Embryo of about six weeks, Umbilical cord, Embryology</p>

The Branchial Region, Embryo of about six weeks, Umbilical cord, Embryology

Henry Vandyke Carter, Public Domain, via Wikimedia Commons

(Click Image to Enlarge)
Umbilical cord
Umbilical cord
Image courtesy S Bhimji MD



Barrios-Arpi LM, Rodríguez Gutiérrez JL, Lopez-Torres B. Histological characterization of umbilical cord in alpaca (Vicugna pacos). Anatomia, histologia, embryologia. 2017 Dec:46(6):533-538. doi: 10.1111/ahe.12298. Epub 2017 Sep 7     [PubMed PMID: 28884482]


Tokar B, Yucel F. Anatomical variations of medial umbilical ligament: clinical significance in laparoscopic exploration of children. Pediatric surgery international. 2009 Dec:25(12):1077-80. doi: 10.1007/s00383-009-2467-y. Epub 2009 Aug 30     [PubMed PMID: 19727772]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence


Mamatha H, Hemalatha B, Vinodini P, Souza AS, Suhani S. Anatomical Study on the Variations in the Branching Pattern of Internal Iliac Artery. The Indian journal of surgery. 2015 Dec:77(Suppl 2):248-52. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0785-0. Epub 2012 Dec 20     [PubMed PMID: 26730003]


Hooper SB, Polglase GR, te Pas AB. A physiological approach to the timing of umbilical cord clamping at birth. Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition. 2015 Jul:100(4):F355-60. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305703. Epub 2014 Dec 24     [PubMed PMID: 25540147]


Di Naro E, Ghezzi F, Raio L, Franchi M, D'Addario V. Umbilical cord morphology and pregnancy outcome. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2001 Jun:96(2):150-7     [PubMed PMID: 11384798]


Fathi AH, Soltanian H, Saber AA. Surgical anatomy and morphologic variations of umbilical structures. The American surgeon. 2012 May:78(5):540-4     [PubMed PMID: 22546125]


Parada Villavicencio C, Adam SZ, Nikolaidis P, Yaghmai V, Miller FH. Imaging of the Urachus: Anomalies, Complications, and Mimics. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2016 Nov-Dec:36(7):2049-2063     [PubMed PMID: 27831842]


Umeda S, Usui N, Kanagawa T, Yamamichi T, Nara K, Ueno T, Owari M, Uehara S, Oue T, Kimura T, Okuyama H. Prenatal and Postnatal Clinical Course of an Urachus Identified as an Allantoic Cyst in the Umbilical Cord. European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie. 2016 Apr:26(2):200-2. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549263. Epub 2016 Mar 16     [PubMed PMID: 26981767]


Ullberg U, Sandstedt B, Lingman G. Hyrtl's anastomosis, the only connection between the two umbilical arteries. A study in full term placentas from AGA infants with normal umbilical artery blood flow. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2001 Jan:80(1):1-6     [PubMed PMID: 11167180]


Ullberg U, Lingman G, Ekman-Ordeberg G, Sandstedt B. Hyrtl's anastomosis is normally developed in placentas from small for gestational age infants. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2003 Aug:82(8):716-21     [PubMed PMID: 12848642]


Coetzee AJ, Castro E, Peres LC. Umbilical Cord Coiling and Zygosity: Is there a Link? Fetal and pediatric pathology. 2015:34(5):336-9. doi: 10.3109/15513815.2015.1075634. Epub 2015 Aug 20     [PubMed PMID: 26291249]


Hubbard LJ, Stanford DA. The Umbilical Cord Lifeline. Journal of emergency nursing. 2017 Nov:43(6):593-595. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2017.07.010. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29100578]


Kiserud T, Acharya G. The fetal circulation. Prenatal diagnosis. 2004 Dec 30:24(13):1049-59     [PubMed PMID: 15614842]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Strong A, Gračner T, Chen P, Kapinos K. On the Value of the Umbilical Cord Blood Supply. Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. 2018 Sep:21(9):1077-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Apr 12     [PubMed PMID: 30224112]


Jin ZW, Nakamura T, Yu HC, Kimura W, Murakami G, Cho BH. Fetal anatomy of peripheral lymphatic vessels: a D2-40 immunohistochemical study using an 18-week human fetus (CRL 155 mm). Journal of anatomy. 2010 Jun:216(6):671-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01229.x. Epub 2010 Apr 7     [PubMed PMID: 20408907]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Marx GF, Joshi CW, Orkin LR. Placental transmission of nitrous oxide. Anesthesiology. 1970 May:32(5):429-32     [PubMed PMID: 5445031]


DeFreitas MJ, Mathur D, Seeherunvong W, Cano T, Katsoufis CP, Duara S, Yasin S, Zilleruelo G, Rodriguez MM, Abitbol CL. Umbilical artery histomorphometry: a link between the intrauterine environment and kidney development. Journal of developmental origins of health and disease. 2017 Jun:8(3):349-356. doi: 10.1017/S2040174417000113. Epub 2017 Mar 6     [PubMed PMID: 28260559]


Hardy KJ, Nye DH. The anatomy of the umbilical vein. The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery. 1969 Nov:39(2):127-32     [PubMed PMID: 5264514]


Baudin B, Bruneel A, Bosselut N, Vaubourdolle M. A protocol for isolation and culture of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Nature protocols. 2007:2(3):481-5     [PubMed PMID: 17406610]


Kashanian M, Akbarian A, Kouhpayehzadeh J. The umbilical coiling index and adverse perinatal outcome. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2006 Oct:95(1):8-13     [PubMed PMID: 16860802]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence


Ernst LM, Minturn L, Huang MH, Curry E, Su EJ. Gross patterns of umbilical cord coiling: correlations with placental histology and stillbirth. Placenta. 2013 Jul:34(7):583-8. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 May 2     [PubMed PMID: 23642640]


Feliks M, Howorka E. [Functional value of false knots of the umbilical cord]. Ginekologia polska. 1968 Jun:39(6):617-24     [PubMed PMID: 5675023]


Lubusky M, Dhaifalah I, Prochazka M, Hyjanek J, Mickova I, Vomackova K, Santavy J. Single umbilical artery and its siding in the second trimester of pregnancy: relation to chromosomal defects. Prenatal diagnosis. 2007 Apr:27(4):327-31     [PubMed PMID: 17286313]


Geipel A, Germer U, Welp T, Schwinger E, Gembruch U. Prenatal diagnosis of single umbilical artery: determination of the absent side, associated anomalies, Doppler findings and perinatal outcome. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000 Feb:15(2):114-7     [PubMed PMID: 10775992]


Blazer S, Sujov P, Escholi Z, Itai BH, Bronshtein M. Single umbilical artery--right or left? does it matter? Prenatal diagnosis. 1997 Jan:17(1):5-8     [PubMed PMID: 9021822]


Budorick NE, Kelly TF, Dunn JA, Scioscia AL. The single umbilical artery in a high-risk patient population: what should be offered? Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2001 Jun:20(6):619-27; quiz 628     [PubMed PMID: 11400936]


Abuhamad AZ, Shaffer W, Mari G, Copel JA, Hobbins JC, Evans AT. Single umbilical artery: does it matter which artery is missing? American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1995 Sep:173(3 Pt 1):728-32     [PubMed PMID: 7573234]


Sepulveda W, Peek MJ, Hassan J, Hollingsworth J. Umbilical vein to artery ratio in fetuses with single umbilical artery. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1996 Jul:8(1):23-6     [PubMed PMID: 8843614]


Hoagland MA, Chatterjee D. Anesthesia for fetal surgery. Paediatric anaesthesia. 2017 Apr:27(4):346-357. doi: 10.1111/pan.13109. Epub 2017 Feb 17     [PubMed PMID: 28211140]


Tomek S, Asch S. Umbilical vein catheterization in the critical newborn: a review of anatomy and technique. EMS world. 2013 Feb:42(2):50-2     [PubMed PMID: 23469464]


. Umbilical-artery catheters. The New England journal of medicine. 1979 Feb 8:300(6):316-7     [PubMed PMID: 759887]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Shevell T, Malone FD, Vidaver J, Porter TF, Luthy DA, Comstock CH, Hankins GD, Eddleman K, Dolan S, Dugoff L, Craigo S, Timor IE, Carr SR, Wolfe HM, Bianchi DW, D'Alton ME. Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2005 Nov:106(5 Pt 1):1039-45     [PubMed PMID: 16260523]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence


Yanaihara A, Hatakeyama S, Ohgi S, Motomura K, Taniguchi R, Hirano A, Takenaka S, Yanaihara T. Difference in the size of the placenta and umbilical cord between women with natural pregnancy and those with IVF pregnancy. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics. 2018 Mar:35(3):431-434. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1084-2. Epub 2017 Nov 14     [PubMed PMID: 29134477]


Painter D, Russell P. Four-vessel umbilical cord associated with multiple congenital anomalies. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1977 Oct:50(4):505-7     [PubMed PMID: 904818]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Kim JH, Jin ZW, Murakami G, Chai OH, Rodríguez-Vázquez JF. Persistent right umbilical vein: a study using serial sections of human embryos and fetuses. Anatomy & cell biology. 2018 Sep:51(3):218-222. doi: 10.5115/acb.2018.51.3.218. Epub 2018 Sep 28     [PubMed PMID: 30310717]


Sepulveda W, Shennan AH, Bower S, Nicolaidis P, Fisk NM. True knot of the umbilical cord: a difficult prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1995 Feb:5(2):106-8     [PubMed PMID: 7719859]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence


Olaya-C M, Bernal JE. Clinical associations to abnormal umbilical cord length in Latin American newborns. Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine. 2015:8(3):251-6. doi: 10.3233/NPM-15915056. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 26485559]


Wakhlu A, Wakhlu AK. The management of exomphalos. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2000 Jan:35(1):73-6     [PubMed PMID: 10646778]


Hoopmann M, Kagan KO. Abnormal Placentation and Umbilical Cord Insertion. Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980). 2020 Apr:41(2):120-137. doi: 10.1055/a-1079-0013. Epub 2020 Apr 7     [PubMed PMID: 32259863]


Muniraman H, Sardesai T, Sardesai S. Disorders of the Umbilical Cord. Pediatrics in review. 2018 Jul:39(7):332-341. doi: 10.1542/pir.2017-0202. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29967078]


Hannaford K, Reeves S, Wegner E. Umbilical cord cysts in the first trimester: are they associated with pregnancy complications? Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2013 May:32(5):801-6. doi: 10.7863/ultra.32.5.801. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 23620322]


Whipple NS, Bennett EE, Kaza E, O'Connor M. Umbilical Cord Pseudocyst in a Newborn. The Journal of pediatrics. 2016 Oct:177():333. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.06.060. Epub 2016 Jul 26     [PubMed PMID: 27473880]


Ancer-Arellano J, Argenziano G, Villarreal-Martinez A, Cardenas-de la Garza JA, Villarreal-Villarreal CD, Ocampo-Candiani J. Dermoscopic findings of umbilical granuloma. Pediatric dermatology. 2019 May:36(3):393-394. doi: 10.1111/pde.13774. Epub 2019 Feb 27     [PubMed PMID: 30811653]