Waste Gas Scavenging System

Issues of Concern

In 1970, the United States established the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), which ultimately led to the development of recommended acceptable levels of volatile anesthetics not confined to the breathing circuit. In test samples measuring levels of pollutants over a defined period, halogenated agents are deemed occupationally acceptable at concentrations of 2 ppm and nitrous oxide at 25 ppm. However, using a mixed combination of agents, the recommended limit is 0.5 ppm. It is worth noting that this recommendation is based on techniques available in 1977 and that these levels represent the lowest detectable levels using those techniques. More recent recommendations suggest nitrous oxide and sevoflurane levels can reach 50 ppm without significant detriment.[4][7][8]

The WAGD system has 4 parts: the relief valve, which allows gas to leave the breathing circuit, the conducting tubing, and the receiving and disposal elements. Two main classes of WAGD systems exist: active and passive. Active systems utilize fans, vacuums, or a venturi design to generate a pressure gradient that drives gases toward the collection unit. Because of the potential for barotrauma, these systems must possess a pressure-relief device such as the adjustable pressure-limiting (APL) valve. Passive systems rely on the gas to diffuse independently along a large diameter tube to the collection unit or the hospital’s ventilation system. Open systems refer to receiving elements with ports permitting gas passage from the environment into the scavenging circuit. In contrast, closed systems are an arrangement of valves, pipes, or tubes and a reservoir that receives gas flows from the ventilator portion of the machine.[9][10]

Clinical Significance

Although manufacturers design anesthesia systems with specific measures to mediate inappropriate exposure to volatile agents, no system is perfectly secure. Points of failure can occur anywhere, but suboptimal environmental concentrations of anesthetic gas are more often a result of operator error or neglect. For example, equipment-related issues may stem from passive exhaust hoses becoming occluded by unrecognized debris or conduit tubing becoming kinked or compressed by the wheels of the anesthesia machine or other operating room equipment. Sources attributable to the anesthesia provider may be due to a failure to perform pressure leak checks in the setting of unrecognized incompetent valves or improperly performing these checks. Despite these unique situations, the most common source of environmental contamination is the practice of the anesthesia provider. The peri-induction period is fraught with opportunities to employ conservative and responsible practices. Some examples of volatile anesthetic stewardship include ensuring an adequate mask seal, minimizing high fresh gas flows when possible, closing vaporizer dials, and carefully refilling the vaporizer.[11][5]

The effects of chronic exposure to these volatile agents are not benign: decreased fertility, spontaneous abortion, teratogenicity, and carcinogenicity are among the reported outcomes described by surgical healthcare personnel. Nitrous oxide specifically has been suggested to be responsible for a myriad of acute and chronic adverse effects on the anesthesia provider. Acute exposure may manifest as lightheadedness, headache, anxiety, depressed motor skills, and nausea or vomiting. Chronic nitrous oxide exposure may compromise The peripheral nervous system, manifested by paresthesias and possibly the irreversible inhibition of vitamin B 12-dependent methionine synthase. These effects depend on the concentration and duration of exposure, but minimizing the possibility of such is essential.[5][12][13]

Not only are personnel affected by anesthetic gases, but the global environment is also affected. Most gas delivered to the patient does not undergo metabolism; thus, when scavenged from the breathing circuit, it is typically disposed into the outside environment in its chemically unaltered form. Sevoflurane, desflurane, and isoflurane are known greenhouse gases and have a global warming potential of up to 2000 times greater than carbon dioxide. Approximately the atmospheric lifespan of nitrous oxide is 150 years, desflurane 10 years, isoflurane 3.6 years, and sevoflurane 1.2 years. Technologies that aim to recycle and reduce the concentrations of these greenhouse gases work by chemically trapping them in proprietary canister absorbers. Additionally, silica zeolite is being investigated as an agent to remove exhaled isoflurane. Other technologies capture gases from the anesthesia machine and permit the collection of unaltered volatile agents to prepare them for future use. Maintaining adequate infrastructure-based ventilation capacities can assist in redistributing harmful concentrations of these gases. Operating room conditions conducive to this require at least 15 exchanges of the room's air per hour. Optimizing current practices and developing new strategies will be critical in future anesthetic care.[7][14][15][16]

A new patented centralized system collects halogenated drugs from the anesthetic gas scavenging systems (AGSS) or Waster Anesthetic Gas Disposal (WAGD) systems in operating rooms. Gases are compressed, dried, sterilized, and captured in sealed tanks on hydrated alkali aluminum silicate adsorbent.

Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions

Proximity to sources of volatile agents is a concern both in the operating room and in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), where the patient continues to exhale physiologically partitioned gas that has not fully equilibrated with the surrounding atmosphere. This directly impacts PACU nurses, who dedicate their undivided attention to recovering surgical patients. One study described a “patient breathing zone” as being 8 inches from the patient’s mouth and suggested a higher degree of exposure in this zone; the detectable levels of waste anesthetic gases exceeded recommended occupational safety limits. As the distance from the source increases, the gas equilibrates with a greater volume. It is ostensibly removed from the immediate vicinity, reducing its potential to cause harm to hospital personnel. Maintaining appropriate distances may be practical and promote safe patient interactions, but this may not be feasible for those patients requiring acute nursing care. The currently marketed novel device that the patient wears is designed to passively scavenge exhaled anesthetic agents, thus reducing the impact on the patient's breathing zone during routine post-anesthesia nursing care.[17][18]