Back To Search Results


Editor: Mickey Y. Lui Updated: 3/27/2023 8:46:59 PM


Aphasia is an impairment of comprehension or formulation of language caused by damage to the cortical center for language. It can be caused by many different brain diseases and disorders; however, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) is the most common reason for a person to develop aphasia. The symptoms of aphasia can range from mild impairment to complete loss of any fundamental components of language such as semantic, grammar, phonology, morphology, and syntax.

The function of language is the ability to express and comprehend spoken and written words. The language area of the brain is typically located in the dominant hemisphere. These structures include Wernicke area, Broca area, and arcuate fasciculus.[1] The Wernicke area is located at the posterior end of the superior temporal gyrus. Its function is to process visual and auditory information, and it is the center for comprehension and planning of words. Broca area is located in the inferior frontal area and is the center for motor execution of speech and sentence formation.[2] Arcuate fasciculus is the neural pathway connecting Wernicke area to the Broca area. 

Specific aphasia syndromes are dependent on the location of the lesion in the brain.[3] In fluent aphasia, the patient can speak in sentences that sound like normal speech, but some of the words are made-up words or have some sounds that are not correct.  People with non-fluent aphasia struggle to get words out, omit words, and speak in very short sentences. Specific non-fluent aphasia syndromes include Broca, transcortical motor, mixed transcortical, and global. Fluent aphasia syndromes include Wernicke, transcortical sensory, conduction, and anomic.


Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care


Aphasia is most commonly seen in patients who have had a cerebrovascular accident but can be seen in neurodegenerative diseases (Alzheimer disease, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, etc.), vascular dementia, brain tumor, or traumatic brain injury.

Aphasia is not secondary to damage to motor or sensory function. It is not a result of peripheral motor or sensory difficulties including paralysis affecting the speech muscles or general hearing impairment.


According to the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), in the United States, there are 180,000 new aphasia cases a year, and 1 of every 272 Americans are affected with aphasia. Approximately one-third of the cases are attributed to cerebrovascular accidents.[4] The most common type is global aphasia.[5] There is an equal incidence of aphasia caused by CVA between men and women.[6] However, the incidence is age-dependent. Those younger than 65 years old have a 15% chance of being affected compared to those older than 85 years old and have a 43% chance of developing the condition.[7] 25% to 40% of stroke survivors develop aphasia due to damage to the language-processing regions of the brain.


Aphasia is caused by lesions to the language areas of the brain, which are typically located in the dominant hemisphere. For the majority of the population, the dominant hemisphere is on the left side.[8] These areas are Wernicke area, Broca area, and arcuate fasciculus. The most common cause of aphasia is due to CVA. CVA occurs when the blood supply to a certain part of the brain is greatly diminished or stopped due to an ischemic event (i.e., embolism or thrombosis) or from a hemorrhagic event (i.e., intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage). In some cases, aphasia can be caused by damage to subcortical structures deep within the left hemisphere, including the internal and external capsules, the thalamus, and the caudate nucleus.[9]

In addition, aphasia can be caused by progressive deterioration of brain tissue such as Alzheimer, Pick disease, vascular dementia, some forms of Parkinson disease, or from direct physical injuries, as seen in traumatic brain injury. Other causes of injuries to language areas can include infection and mass effects from brain tumors.[10]

History and Physical

There are many different types of aphasia syndromes with signs and symptoms that may overlap with each other. A clinician with the insight to differentiate and recognize the differences in each type of aphasia can carefully formulate an individualized treatment plan. 

Wernicke Aphasia (Receptive)

  • The lesion is located in the Wernicke area (Brodmann area 22), which is the center for comprehension and planning of words.[11][12] Although patients are unable to understand written and/or spoken words, their speech remains fluent. At the same time, however, their speech is meaningless and can include paraphasia, both phonemic and semantics, neologism, and jargon. Phonemic paraphasia involves words that sound alike (i.e., sap and map), while semantics paraphasia pertains to words that relate to each other (i.e., sofa for couch). Neologisms are made-up words. Jargon is a string of made-up words in combination with real words that do not make sense together in context. These patients are unaware of their errors and do not recognize that their speech lacks meaning.
    • Example:
      • Examiner: Hi, how are you doing today?
      • Patient: I’m happy, are you pretty.
      • Examiner: What are you doing today?
      • Patient: We stayed with the water today.

Broca Aphasia (Expressive)

  • The lesion is located in the Broca area, which is the center for the motor part of speech and sentence formation.[12] Patients are unable to formulate grammatically correct spoken and written language properly. Although their speech is non-fluent and lacks words with grammatical significance such as prepositions and articles, patients are able to include important content words such as nouns, verbs, and some adjectives. Therefore, patients are usually able to convey the message that they are trying to express.
    • Example:
      • Examiner: Hi, Mr. Smith, when did you graduate college?
      • Patient: I was umm… 7 years… ago
      • Examiner: What did you use to do?
      • Patient: well… work… um… work… on desk… uh… marketing… very good…

Conduction Aphasia

  • The lesion is located at the arcuate fasciculus, which is the neural pathway connecting the Wernicke area to the Broca area.[1] Patients have difficulties or are unable to repeat what is spoken to them. They recognize their paraphasic errors and try to correct them.
    • Example:
      • Examiner: Please repeat after me; boy.
      • Patient: Boy.
      • Examiner: Seventy-nine.
      • Patient: Ninety-seven…no… seventy sine… seventy-nice

Transcortical Sensory Aphasia

  • The lesion is located around Wernicke area, however, sparing Wernicke area and isolating it. Patients have an inability to comprehend but can repeat with fluent speech. At the same time, patients display the presence of semantic paraphasia. 

Transcortical Motor Aphasia

  • The lesion is located around Broca area, however, sparing Broca area and isolating it. Patients have a non-fluent speech but are able to repeat long, complex phrases. Patients tend to remain silent but may speak with 1 to 2 words.

Mixed Transcortical Aphasia

  • The lesion is located around Wernicke area, Broca area, and arcuate fasciculus, but these areas are spared and are isolated. Patients would have severe speaking and comprehension impairment; however, they can repeat long, complex sentences.

Global Aphasia

  • Lesions vary in size and location but tend to follow the left middle cerebral artery distribution. This is the most severe form of aphasia. Patients can only produce a few recognizable words and have little to no understanding of written or spoken language. Patients are unable to read or write.


  • The lesion is at the angular gyrus and is the mildest form of aphasia. Patients have difficulties with word finding.

Related Behaviors

  • Self-repairs are disruptions in fluent speech resulting from mis-attempts to repair erred production of speech.
  • Speech disfluencies include repetitions and prolongations at the phonemic, syllable, and word level with pathological frequency.
  • Preserved and automatic language are when some language or language sequences that were utilized frequently prior to onset are still produced with more ease.
  • Struggle in non-fluent aphasias is a severe limitation in the number of words expressed


Patients with aphasia usually are evaluated with computed tomography (CT) without contrast initially if a CVA is suspected, and subsequently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify the precise location of the lesion. Then they are evaluated by speech/language pathologists to assess and help identify areas of a language deficit. Several formal exams are used to identify aphasia, such as the Boston diagnostic aphasia exam and Western aphasia battery. Boston diagnostic aphasia exam provides a severity rating from slight to severe. The Western aphasia battery helps assess if the patient is aphasic and if so, determines the type and severity. Furthermore, it provides a baseline and should be repeated to trend improvements, all the while identifying strengths and weaknesses.

For the evaluation of aphasia, three parts of language assessments are used to distinguish the different types of aphasia syndromes. This includes fluency of speech, comprehension, and repetition. Fluency of speech entails a typical speech rate, intact syntactic ability, and effortless speech output. Comprehension is the patient's ability to understand written and spoken words. Finally, repetition is the patient's ability to repeat written or spoken words.

Fluent Aphasia Syndromes

  • Wernicke- fluent, impaired comprehension, unable to repeat
  • Transcortical sensory- fluent, impaired comprehension, able to repeat
  • Conduction- fluent, intact comprehension, unable to repeat
  • Anomic- fluent, intact comprehension, able to repeat

Non-fluent Aphasia Syndromes

  • Broca- non-fluent, intact comprehension, unable to repeat
  • Transcortical motor- non-fluent, intact comprehension, able to repeat
  • Mixed transcortical- non-fluent, impaired comprehension, able to repeat
  • Global- non-fluent, impaired comprehension, unable to repeat

A cognitive neuropsychological approach attempts to identify the key language skills that are not functioning properly. These are called modules. A patient may have difficulty with just one module or a number of modules.

Treatment / Management

The initial treatment of aphasia is dependent on its cause. Immediate management follows the ABCs of critical care: airway, breathing, and circulation. In patients with acute CVA, patients may receive intravenous thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), intra-arterial mechanical thrombectomy, or carotid endarterectomy.[13] Surgical decompression is used for patients with hemorrhagic CVA, TBI, or brain tumors. If the cause is due to an infection, initiation of steroids, antivirals, or antibiotics may be indicated.(B2)

While there is no standardized treatment, the primary goal is for patients to regain their greatest level of independence. To achieve this goal, the patient’s physical comorbidities, mental health, and deficits need to be addressed and properly managed. In addition, caregiver education and social support greatly impact a patient’s recovery outcome.

Patients suffering from aphasia have difficulties communicating their wants and needs. Some patients with aphasia are cognizant of their deficit and situation, which can be frustrating and may lead to severe depression and lack of participation in therapy. Therefore, early diagnosis of depression is instrumental in treating the aphasic patient. The patient will require emotional support from family, friends, and/or spiritual leaders. Referral to a psychiatrist, neuropsychologist, and/or psychologist for evaluation and management may be indicated. In addition, the treatment of depression includes pharmacological management.[14] First-line medications include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), as well as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). However, SSRIs are generally preferred due to lower side effect profiles.(A1)

Patients will be evaluated by speech-language pathologists to determine their strengths and weaknesses to individually customize a treatment plan. However, it has been shown that patients have better improvement with short, intense treatment sessions compared to longer but less intense treatment sessions.[15] Patients will be provided with different compensatory strategies, also known as augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). These strategies can include providing patients with a whiteboard, pen, and paper for writing, photos of common items for identification, or more advanced devices, such as tablets with common phrases or pictures.(A1)

Patients with non-fluent aphasias, such as Broca aphasia, have impaired fluency when it comes to sentence generation but tend to have intact singing abilities. Melodic intonation therapy (MIT) utilizes melody and rhythm to improve a patient’s fluency. The theory behind MIT is to utilize the undamaged non-dominant hemisphere that is responsible for intoning and reducing the use of the dominant hemisphere. MIT can only be used in patients with intact auditory comprehension.[16] 

Advances in neuroimaging technology now can appreciate the activation of the language areas of the brain, allowing for further advances in aphasia research and treatment.[4][17] Studies on transcranial stimulation by direct electrical current (TES) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have shown promising results.[18] Along with therapy, there has been an improvement in word-finding, function, and activity outcomes.[19] It should be noted that using neuroimaging to isolate optimal stimulation sites for the use of TES is expensive and time-consuming; therefore, it is currently more applicable in research rather than clinical treatment. Stimulation of ancillary systems is easier and has shown to be promising.[20] Studies on pharmacological therapy have yielded mixed results and tend to coincide with the treatment of CVAs. Drug therapies have included dopaminergic agents, and catecholaminergic agents can facilitate neural plasticity and recovery but require further research.[21](A1)

Differential Diagnosis

Aphasia can present insidiously or acutely and is caused by several disease processes that need to be ruled out such as CVA, brain tumor, brain hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury (TBI), and dementia due to toxin, infection, or vascular.

Other differential diagnoses to consider include:

  • Altered mental status from encephalopathy or delirium 
  • Dysphonia
  • Dysarthria
  • Apraxia of speech
  • Cognitive-communication disorder
  • Deafness


Recovery of aphasia varies depending on the type, severity, cause, motivation of the patients, etc.[22] Most improvement can be seen two to three months after onset and tends to peak at six months, with recovery rates drastically decreasing thereafter. Broca aphasia has better recovery when compared to global aphasia, and global aphasia has better recovery compared to Wernicke aphasia.[23]


Patients suffering from aphasia, who were once educated and literate, are now unable to communicate their basic wants and needs. Many have intact awareness of their deficit and may become frustrated, even violent. They may feel that they have lost control of their life and feel isolated, which will lead to severe depression.[24] In addition, many will suffer from other deficits seen in CVA, TBI, etc., such as the loss of mobility, ability to perform activities of daily living, or potentially be bedridden. Patients may be incontinent of bowel or bladder and unable to communicate whether they have urinated or defecated. This will increase the likelihood of infections or pressure ulcers. They may have pain that is undertreated. In summary, complications of aphasia are related or dependent ultimately on the underlying cause.

Many patients with aphasia often have co-occurring non-linguistic cognitive deficits. This often involves attention and working memory. This can involve the verbal domain as well as the visuospatial domain.[25]


  • Physiatrist (physical medicine and rehabilitation)
  • Psychiatrist
  • Neurologist
  • Speech-language pathologist
  • Neuropsychologist

Deterrence and Patient Education

The most common cause of aphasia is CVA, and patients should be educated on correcting modifiable risk factors that may lead to a CVA. The most important modifiable risk factor is hypertension. Patients should follow various guidelines, such as the American College of Cardiology (ACC) or the Joint National Committee (JNC-7, 8), to keep their blood pressure under control.[26] Patients with atrial fibrillation should be on anticoagulation based on CAD VASC2 Score, and those with diabetes need their blood sugar controlled.[27] Patients should be encouraged to quit smoking. Ultimately, patient education depends on the underlying cause.

Pearls and Other Issues

It is important to understand that patients with aphasia have an impairment of language due to injury from the brain and not a cognitive deficit. When communicating with patients with aphasia, speak clearly, and use simple and short sentences. Another technique is repeating or writing down keywords. Also, allow patients time to talk and finish their thoughts and avoid correcting their speech.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Aphasia is caused by different disease processes and consists of many syndromes. Because of this, it is easily misdiagnosed. The initial challenge of diagnosing aphasia is that patients are unable to communicate to provide an adequate history for diagnosis. This may require a history from family members or friends, which can be unreliable or unavailable. Therefore, the healthcare professional needs to be familiar with the signs and symptoms of aphasia.

Initially, patients will present to primary care or emergency clinicians. The ability to recognize aphasia can aid in the diagnosis of its underlining cause. For example, patients with an acute stroke can initially present with aphasia and can be misdiagnosed as delirium. Aphasia has many underlining causes and requires an interprofessional team that includes a physiatrist, psychiatrist, neurologist, speech-language pathologist, and neuropsychologist to manage comorbidities and deficits.[15] Interprofessional team members need to know how to properly communicate and interact with aphasic patients to avoid frustration and encourage patient participation.

The speech-language pathologist plays a vital role in identifying the type of aphasia syndrome and formulating an individualized rehabilitation regimen with the assistance of the physiatrist. Depending on the patient’s comorbidities, other specialists are required. Patients who suffered from a stroke may have cardiac, pulmonary, renal, or integumentary issues requiring a cardiologist, pulmonologist, nephrologist, and wound care clinician. Physical therapists and occupational therapists will be a part of the interprofessional team to treat physical deficits and aid in aphasia treatment. Patients with neurodegenerative disease will require a neurologist, while patients with infectious causes require infectious disease specialists.

Patients with aphasia will likely suffer from depression and require support from healthcare professionals such as a neuropsychologist, psychologist, and psychiatrist. Patients will also require social support. Family members, friends, and/or religious leaders will require extensive education to assist patients in their recovery process.

There is no specific protocol in treating patients with aphasia. The treatment and rehabilitation regimen is highly individualized and requires an extensive interprofessional team. Proper consultation of specialists and education of family members and friends is required to optimize patient treatment and allow patients to regain their greatest level of independence.



Chang EF, Raygor KP, Berger MS. Contemporary model of language organization: an overview for neurosurgeons. Journal of neurosurgery. 2015 Feb:122(2):250-61. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS132647. Epub 2014 Nov 28     [PubMed PMID: 25423277]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Ochfeld E, Newhart M, Molitoris J, Leigh R, Cloutman L, Davis C, Crinion J, Hillis AE. Ischemia in broca area is associated with broca aphasia more reliably in acute than in chronic stroke. Stroke. 2010 Feb:41(2):325-30. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.570374. Epub 2009 Dec 31     [PubMed PMID: 20044520]


Grossman M, Irwin DJ. Primary Progressive Aphasia and Stroke Aphasia. Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.). 2018 Jun:24(3, BEHAVIORAL NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY):745-767. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000618. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29851876]


Pulvermüller F, Berthier ML. Aphasia therapy on a neuroscience basis. Aphasiology. 2008 Jun:22(6):563-599     [PubMed PMID: 18923644]


Wang R, Wiley C. Confusion vs Broca Aphasia: A Case Report. The Permanente journal. 2020:24():. doi: 10.7812/TPP/19-061. Epub 2019 Dec 3     [PubMed PMID: 31852049]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Hier DB, Yoon WB, Mohr JP, Price TR, Wolf PA. Gender and aphasia in the Stroke Data Bank. Brain and language. 1994 Jul:47(1):155-67     [PubMed PMID: 7922475]


Engelter ST, Gostynski M, Papa S, Frei M, Born C, Ajdacic-Gross V, Gutzwiller F, Lyrer PA. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke. 2006 Jun:37(6):1379-84     [PubMed PMID: 16690899]


Lahiri D, Dubey S, Sawale VM, Das G, Ray BK, Chatterjee S, Ardila A. Incidence and Symptomatology of Vascular Crossed Aphasia in Bengali. Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology. 2019 Dec:32(4):256-267. doi: 10.1097/WNN.0000000000000210. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 31800486]


Kuljic-Obradovic DC. Subcortical aphasia: three different language disorder syndromes? European journal of neurology. 2003 Jul:10(4):445-8     [PubMed PMID: 12823499]


Deng X, Zhang Y, Xu L, Wang B, Wang S, Wu J, Zhang D, Wang R, Wang J, Zhao J. Comparison of language cortex reorganization patterns between cerebral arteriovenous malformations and gliomas: a functional MRI study. Journal of neurosurgery. 2015 May:122(5):996-1003. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.JNS14629. Epub 2015 Feb 6     [PubMed PMID: 25658788]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence


DeWitt I, Rauschecker JP. Wernicke's area revisited: parallel streams and word processing. Brain and language. 2013 Nov:127(2):181-91     [PubMed PMID: 24404576]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Javed K, Reddy V, M Das J, Wroten M. Neuroanatomy, Wernicke Area. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 30422593]


Medhi G, Parida S, Nicholson P, Senapati SB, Padhy BP, Pereira VM. Mechanical Thrombectomy for Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: A Case Series and Technical Note. World neurosurgery. 2020 Aug:140():148-161. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.220. Epub 2020 May 8     [PubMed PMID: 32389866]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence


Allida S, Cox KL, Hsieh CF, House A, Hackett ML. Pharmacological, psychological and non-invasive brain stimulation interventions for preventing depression after stroke. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2020 May 11:5(5):CD003689. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003689.pub4. Epub 2020 May 11     [PubMed PMID: 32390167]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence


Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, Enderby P, Campbell P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2016 Jun 1:2016(6):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4. Epub 2016 Jun 1     [PubMed PMID: 27245310]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence


Schlaug G, Marchina S, Norton A. From Singing to Speaking: Why Singing May Lead to Recovery of Expressive Language Function in Patients with Broca's Aphasia. Music perception. 2008 Apr 1:25(4):315-323     [PubMed PMID: 21197418]


San Lee J, Yoo S, Park S, Kim HJ, Park KC, Seong JK, Suh MK, Lee J, Jang H, Kim KW, Kim Y, Cho SH, Kim SJ, Kim JP, Jung YH, Kim EJ, Suh YL, Lockhart SN, Seeley WW, Na DL, Seo SW. Differences in neuroimaging features of early- versus late-onset nonfluent/agrammatic primary progressive aphasia. Neurobiology of aging. 2020 Feb:86():92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.10.011. Epub 2019 Nov 26     [PubMed PMID: 31784276]


Naeser MA, Martin PI, Ho M, Treglia E, Kaplan E, Bashir S, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and aphasia rehabilitation. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2012 Jan:93(1 Suppl):S26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.04.026. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22202188]


Fridriksson J, Rorden C, Elm J, Sen S, George MS, Bonilha L. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Sham Stimulation to Treat Aphasia After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA neurology. 2018 Dec 1:75(12):1470-1476. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2287. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30128538]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence


Meinzer M, Darkow R, Lindenberg R, Flöel A. Electrical stimulation of the motor cortex enhances treatment outcome in post-stroke aphasia. Brain : a journal of neurology. 2016 Apr:139(Pt 4):1152-63. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww002. Epub 2016 Feb 16     [PubMed PMID: 26912641]


Hillis AE. Developments in treating the nonmotor symptoms of stroke. Expert review of neurotherapeutics. 2020 Jun:20(6):567-576. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1763173. Epub 2020 May 12     [PubMed PMID: 32363957]


Berthier ML, García-Casares N, Walsh SF, Nabrozidis A, Ruíz de Mier RJ, Green C, Dávila G, Gutiérrez A, Pulvermüller F. Recovery from post-stroke aphasia: lessons from brain imaging and implications for rehabilitation and biological treatments. Discovery medicine. 2011 Oct:12(65):275-89     [PubMed PMID: 22031666]


Bakheit AM, Shaw S, Carrington S, Griffiths S. The rate and extent of improvement with therapy from the different types of aphasia in the first year after stroke. Clinical rehabilitation. 2007 Oct:21(10):941-9     [PubMed PMID: 17981853]


Kariyawasam PN, Pathirana KD, Hewage DC. Factors associated with health related quality of life of patients with stroke in Sri Lankan context. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2020 May 8:18(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01388-y. Epub 2020 May 8     [PubMed PMID: 32384894]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence


Kasselimis DS, Simos PG, Economou A, Peppas C, Evdokimidis I, Potagas C. Are memory deficits dependent on the presence of aphasia in left brain damaged patients? Neuropsychologia. 2013 Aug:51(9):1773-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jun 11     [PubMed PMID: 23770384]


Burns J, Persaud-Sharma D, Green D. Beyond JNC 8: implications for evaluation and management of hypertension in underserved populations. Acta cardiologica. 2019 Feb:74(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2018.1435987. Epub 2018 Mar 5     [PubMed PMID: 29504458]


Chen LQ, Tsiamtsiouris E, Singh H, Rapelje K, Weber J, Dey D, Kosmidou I, Levine J, Cao JJ. Prevalence of Coronary Artery Calcium in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Cardiovascular Risk Factors. The American journal of cardiology. 2020 Jun 15:125(12):1765-1769. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.03.018. Epub 2020 Apr 8     [PubMed PMID: 32336536]