Tools
Curriculum Development in Medical Simulation
Introduction
Simulation training, initially developed in the 18th century, has become a mainstay of medical education.[1] The medical profession strives to provide safe and high-quality care to patients. Both evidence-based medicine and procedural competency are important in attaining this goal.[2] Simulation, which spans from procedural training to case-based scenarios and beyond, has been implemented for all levels of learners. While Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Basic Life Support (BLS) training are some of the most common simulation scenarios people will encounter, simulation training can be much more advanced, complex, and interprofessional. Simulation activities do not occur in isolation. Appropriate pre-simulation education is necessary, and it should occur in conjunction with adequate debriefing. Therefore, the development of a robust curriculum using simulation must be deliberate to ensure that it is a valuable experience for all participants.
Function
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Function
Medical simulation curricula should be specifically tailored both to the level of the learner and the educational objectives. Interprofessional simulations have been found to be highly effective and can be built into a more extensive simulation curriculum for any profession, discipline, and experience level. This approach has been found to be especially effective in Crisis Resource Management training.[3] Furthermore, procedural training and competency are achievable using simulation to help improve proceduralist comfort and knowledge as well as increase patient safety.[4]
Curriculum Development
Longitudinal simulation curricula should be developed in advance and ideally would build on both prior simulation experience in addition to non-simulation based education. Bloom's Taxonomy Principle is a learning theory hierarchical model that classifies learning objectives based on complexity and specificity.[5] Levels include:
- Knowledge
- Comprehension
- Application
- Analysis
- Synthesis
- Evaluation
These levels of learning require consideration when developing a simulation case and a full curriculum, as they allow learners to reflect on, and add to, existing skills and previously learned information.[6]
Crisis Resource Management (CRM) refers to the basic principles and non-technical skills that are necessary to manage critical situations. CRM has been used in many venues outside of medicine, such as the military and the airline industry. CRM objectives include: ensuring role clarity, recognizing an emergency and calling for help early, allocating appropriate resources, and utilizing effective communication. These are practiced skills that are enriched through simulation and have links to improved patient safety.[3][7][8]
Furthermore, simulation is a way to educate learners about vulnerable populations such as pediatrics, LGBTQ individuals, the undomiciled, and those with mental illness. It also allows learners to practice effective communication skills required in difficult scenarios such as breaking bad news and disclosing medical errors. Finally, simulation can be helpful in training for infrequently encountered situations such as mass-casualty incidents and even in-flight medical emergencies.[9][10]
Simulation can either be low or high fidelity, depending on the availability of resources and the goals for the exercise. "Low-fidelity" simulations, performed using minimal equipment, can be very useful in low-resource areas as well as to teach specific tasks. "High-fidelity" simulation, utilizing more advanced equipment and technology, can be very engaging, allowing learners to "suspend disbelief" associated with simulation. While this encourages engagement in the activity, it can also be expensive, requires expertise and training in using the devices, and can be challenging to maintain. For a robust simulation curriculum, a mixture of high- and low-fidelity simulation is ideal.[11] Many resources also exist to help educators develop a well-rounded simulation curriculum and to develop scenarios.[12]
Simulation debriefing is also critical to ensure a complete learning experience and can be done in various ways (post-event or intra-event) and can be self-guided or facilitator-guided. Any modality can be employed but should be tailored to the goals of the simulation and the learners themselves.[13]
Clinical Significance
Improving simulation curriculum design to maximize experiential learning has been shown to have clinical benefits, including improved patient safety. For example, simulation-based education has been demonstrated to lower catheter-related bloodstream infections.[14]
For this reason, many organizations use extensive simulation instruction as part of the onboarding process to ensure that every member of the team, including residents, fellows, attendings, and nurses, have an adequate skill level for various critical and high-risk procedures.
Many other examples of successful simulation training for procedures exist, showing the efficacy of this educational modality. Paracentesis procedure simulation training, coupled with pre-simulation didactics, was found to increase competence and confidence in doing the procedure.[4] Thoracentesis procedural simulation training was also found to be successful in helping residents meet the mastery standard.[15] Another area of clinical medicine where it is useful is in sedation and analgesia training.[16]
Furthermore, other industries, such as aviation, adopted advanced CRM programs, and as a result, had improved safety outcomes. Similar initiatives can be used in healthcare to improve patient safety.[17][18] Simulation can improve outcomes by refining teamwork, leadership, and communication skills, in addition to procedural skill competencies. These can thereby impact “employee retention or more effective task management in critical situations,” which can affect safety outcomes and hopefully decrease adverse events in the future.[19] One particularly high-risk clinical arena is the emergency department due to the critical and complex nature of the medical care, the constantly changing environment, and staff, as well as multiple patients receiving treatment simultaneously. CRM training is beneficial, even with limited interventions.[20] Other clinical areas where CRM training is extensively trialed and studied include the operating room with anesthesiology, nursing, surgery, and operating room staff.
Finally, simulation is an interactive and engaging tool to improve clinical knowledge and confidence, which, in turn, can improve patient safety and outcomes.[21]
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
Simulation education is appropriate for all levels of the healthcare team, including non-clinical staff, clinicians, and administrators. As shown by several reviews, this form of learning and team training is beneficial and can positively impact clinical outcomes and improve safety in healthcare.[17][21] To achieve these ever-important goals, a well-organized and deliberately created simulation curriculum should be developed to give a well-rounded educational experience for the learners. This includes non-simulation based didactic education (lectures, reading, etc.) combined with the simulation and its associated debriefing. Simulation training seems to be very beneficial when addressing CRM principles and can be highly useful in procedural training, which can also have a great impact on patient safety.
References
Buck GH. Development of simulators in medical education. Gesnerus. 1991:48 Pt 1():7-28 [PubMed PMID: 1855669]
Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 2006 Winter:1(4):252-6. doi: 10.1097/01.SIH.0000242724.08501.63. Epub [PubMed PMID: 19088599]
Fung L, Boet S, Bould MD, Qosa H, Perrier L, Tricco A, Tavares W, Reeves S. Impact of crisis resource management simulation-based training for interprofessional and interdisciplinary teams: A systematic review. Journal of interprofessional care. 2015:29(5):433-44. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1017555. Epub 2015 May 14 [PubMed PMID: 25973615]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceSall D, Wigger GW, Kinnear B, Kelleher M, Warm E, O'Toole JK. Paracentesis Simulation: A Comprehensive Approach to Procedural Education. MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources. 2018 Aug 30:14():10747. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10747. Epub 2018 Aug 30 [PubMed PMID: 30800947]
Adams NE. Bloom's taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA. 2015 Jul:103(3):152-3. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010. Epub [PubMed PMID: 26213509]
Benishek LE, Lazzara EH, Gaught WL, Arcaro LL, Okuda Y, Salas E. The Template of Events for Applied and Critical Healthcare Simulation (TEACH Sim): a tool for systematic simulation scenario design. Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 2015 Feb:10(1):21-30. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000058. Epub [PubMed PMID: 25514586]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceRall M, Oberfrank S. [Human factors and crisis resource management: improving patient safety]. Der Unfallchirurg. 2013 Oct:116(10):892-9. doi: 10.1007/s00113-013-2447-5. Epub [PubMed PMID: 24097240]
Boet S, Bould MD, Fung L, Qosa H, Perrier L, Tavares W, Reeves S, Tricco AC. Transfer of learning and patient outcome in simulated crisis resource management: a systematic review. Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie. 2014 Jun:61(6):571-82. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0143-8. Epub 2014 Mar 25 [PubMed PMID: 24664414]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceBen-Ishay O, Mitaritonno M, Catena F, Sartelli M, Ansaloni L, Kluger Y. Mass casualty incidents - time to engage. World journal of emergency surgery : WJES. 2016:11():8. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0064-7. Epub 2016 Feb 3 [PubMed PMID: 26848306]
Bentley S, Iavicoli L, Boehm L, Agriantonis G, Dilos B, LaMonica J, Smith C, Wong L, Lopez T, Galer A, Kessle S. A Simulated Mass Casualty Incident Triage Exercise: SimWars. MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources. 2019 May 10:15():10823. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10823. Epub 2019 May 10 [PubMed PMID: 31139741]
Armenia S, Thangamathesvaran L, Caine AD, King N, Kunac A, Merchant AM. The Role of High-Fidelity Team-Based Simulation in Acute Care Settings: A Systematic Review. Surgery journal (New York, N.Y.). 2018 Jul:4(3):e136-e151. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667315. Epub 2018 Aug 13 [PubMed PMID: 30109273]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceBambini D. Writing a Simulation Scenario: A Step-By-Step Guide. AACN advanced critical care. 2016 Feb:27(1):62-70. doi: 10.4037/aacnacc2016986. Epub [PubMed PMID: 26909455]
Sawyer T, Eppich W, Brett-Fleegler M, Grant V, Cheng A. More Than One Way to Debrief: A Critical Review of Healthcare Simulation Debriefing Methods. Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 2016 Jun:11(3):209-17. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000148. Epub [PubMed PMID: 27254527]
Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, O'Leary KJ, Wayne DB. Simulation-based mastery learning reduces complications during central venous catheter insertion in a medical intensive care unit. Critical care medicine. 2009 Oct:37(10):2697-701 [PubMed PMID: 19885989]
Wayne DB, Barsuk JH, O'Leary KJ, Fudala MJ, McGaghie WC. Mastery learning of thoracentesis skills by internal medicine residents using simulation technology and deliberate practice. Journal of hospital medicine. 2008 Jan:3(1):48-54. doi: 10.1002/jhm.268. Epub [PubMed PMID: 18257046]
Teng WN, Su BC, Cheng HW. Innovation in sedation and analgesia training. Current opinion in anaesthesiology. 2019 Aug:32(4):472-479. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000757. Epub [PubMed PMID: 31219869]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceGaba DM. Crisis resource management and teamwork training in anaesthesia. British journal of anaesthesia. 2010 Jul:105(1):3-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq124. Epub [PubMed PMID: 20551023]
Bleetman A, Sanusi S, Dale T, Brace S. Human factors and error prevention in emergency medicine. Emergency medicine journal : EMJ. 2012 May:29(5):389-93. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.107698. Epub 2011 May 12 [PubMed PMID: 21565880]
Speer T, Mühlbradt T, Fastner C, Schöffski O, Schröder S. [Simulation training as part of clinical risk management : A health economic view]. Der Anaesthesist. 2019 Mar:68(3):161-170. doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-0540-z. Epub 2019 Feb 7 [PubMed PMID: 30734069]
Truta TS, Boeriu CM, Copotoiu SM, Petrisor M, Turucz E, Vatau D, Lazarovici M. Improving nontechnical skills of an interprofessional emergency medical team through a one day crisis resource management training. Medicine. 2018 Aug:97(32):e11828. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011828. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30095658]
Okuda Y, Bryson EO, DeMaria S Jr, Jacobson L, Quinones J, Shen B, Levine AI. The utility of simulation in medical education: what is the evidence? The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York. 2009 Aug:76(4):330-43. doi: 10.1002/msj.20127. Epub [PubMed PMID: 19642147]