Back To Search Results

Appendicitis in Pregnancy

Editor: Saran Lotfollahzadeh Updated: 11/17/2023 6:21:12 AM

Introduction

Acute appendicitis is a clinical diagnosis confirmed by histopathological findings characterized by inflammation of the vermiform appendix. Clinically, acute appendicitis usually presents acutely within 24 hours. However, the presenting symptoms can be more indolent if appendiceal perforation results in the formation of a contained abscess.[1][2][3][4] The clinical course of acute appendicitis can be highly variable, and the diagnosis may be challenging, particularly in pregnant patients.

Acute appendicitis is the leading cause of nonobstetric surgical disease in pregnant patients. Diagnosing and treating appendicitis promptly during pregnancy is essential to avoid potentially life-threatening complications for both the gravida and the fetus.[5] However, diagnosing acute appendicitis during pregnancy can be challenging since the stereotypical signs and symptoms may not be apparent or easily confused with the typical symptoms of pregnancy. Furthermore, the gravid uterus can displace the appendix and complicate the clinical picture. Standard biochemical and laboratory indicators commonly used in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis may be less reliable during pregnancy.[6] 

The general pathogenic, diagnostic, and therapeutic principles of acute appendicitis during pregnancy follow the same pattern as in nonpregnant patients, with specific modifications to accommodate the physiology of normal pregnancy and the growing fetus.

Etiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Etiology

Acute appendicitis is most commonly caused by mechanical obstruction of the appendiceal lumen, usually due to the presence of an appendicolith. However, luminal obstruction can also be due to appendiceal tumors, intestinal parasites, or hypertrophied lymphatic tissue. Hypertrophied lymphatic tissue is more common in the pediatric population, and adults are more commonly affected by infections, fecaliths, or neoplasms.[7] 

The appendix hosts aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, including Escherichia coli and Bacteroides spp. Therefore, the increased bacterial load during appendiceal luminal obstruction can lead to acute inflammation and abscess formation. Recent next-generation sequencing studies have found that patients with complicated perforated appendicitis have significantly higher bacterial phyla load.[8]

The etiologies of acute appendicitis in pregnant patients are similar to those in nonpregnant adults.[9] Specific microorganisms such as Fusobacterium nucleatum, an anaerobic oral commensal and periodontal pathogen, are associated with pregnancy-related complications such as chorioamnionitis, preterm birth, stillbirth, neonatal sepsis, and preeclampsia. However, the evidence for distinct microbiological culprits for acute appendicitis during pregnancy is lacking.[10]

Epidemiology

Acute appendicitis in the general population occurs at a rate of 100 to 223 new cases per 100,000 individuals per year and represents the primary cause of acute abdominal conditions.[11][12] In the United States, approximately 300,000 hospital visits are reported annually for appendicitis-related issues.[13][9] Appendicitis most commonly occurs between the ages of 5 and 45, with a mean age of 28.[9]

The prevalence of acute appendicitis is similar in pregnant and nonpregnant patients, occurring in 1 of 181 to 1700 pregnancies.[14] The incidence is highest in the second trimester.[15][16] Acute appendicitis accounts for two-thirds of nontraumatic surgical emergencies during pregnancy.[5]

Pathophysiology

The pathophysiology of acute appendicitis in pregnancy is the same as that in nonpregnant persons. 

Acute appendicitis is most commonly due to appendiceal luminal obstruction. This obstruction may be caused by lymphoid hyperplasia, parasitic infections, fecaliths, or benign or malignant neoplasms.

Once obstructed, the appendix fills with mucus and becomes distended, increasing intraluminal and intramural pressure. This results in small vessel occlusion, thrombosis, and lymphatic stasis. As lymphatic and vascular compromise advances, the wall of the appendix becomes ischemic and necrotic. Bacterial overgrowth occurs in the obstructed appendix, with aerobic organisms predominating in early appendicitis and mixed aerobes and anaerobes later in the course. Common organisms include Escherichia coliPeptostreptococcusBacteroides, and Pseudomonas. Once significant inflammation and necrosis occur, the appendix is at risk of perforation, leading to a localized abscess and sometimes frank peritonitis.[17][18] 

Appendiceal distention is responsible for the initial visceral and vague abdominal pain often described by the affected patient. The pain typically does not localize to the right lower quadrant until the appendiceal tip becomes inflamed and irritates the adjacent parietal peritoneum or perforation occurs, resulting in localized peritonitis. However, due to the lifting and stretching of the anterior abdominal wall by the gravid uterus, the inflamed appendix is less likely to irritate the parietal peritoneum.

Histopathology

The evidence for distinct histopathological findings for acute appendicitis during pregnancy is lacking. Therefore, the generally accepted histopathological findings and categorization of acute appendicitis in nonpregnant patients also apply to pregnant patients.

The significant microscopic findings in acute appendicitis include neutrophilic infiltration of the muscularis propria. The degree and extent of inflammation are directly proportionate to the severity of the infection and duration of the disease. As acute appendicitis progresses, appendiceal fat and surrounding tissues become involved.[19][9]

Appendicitis has been classified into three main categories based on histopathological findings.

  • Suppurative or phlegmonous appendicitis: This category of appendicitis is characterized by neutrophils infiltrating the appendiceal mucosa, submucosa, and muscularis propria. The inflammation extends throughout the entire appendiceal wall and can cause extensive ulceration. Intramural microabscesses accompanied by vascular thrombosis may also be observed. The appendix may appear grossly normal in suppurative appendicitis. However, poorly demarcated serosa, dilation, surface vessel congestion, or fibrinopurulent serosal exudate may be seen. Increased appendiceal diameter is an uncertain finding.[9] 

  • Gangrenous and perforated appendicitis: The main characteristic of this category of appendicitis is wall necrosis. If left untreated, perforation will occur. In cases of perforation, transmural inflammation with areas of necrosis and extensive mucosal ulceration can be observed. The inflammation is also anticipated to extend to the surrounding area, specifically the mesoappendix. Grossly, the appendix wall appears friable and may display shades of purple, green, or black.[20]

  • Periappendicitis: Periappendicitis is inflammation of the serosa and subserosa; the inflammatory infiltrate does not extend into the muscularis propria. Mucosal erosions may be present and suggest inflammation and tissue damage. The gross appearance of periappendicitis varies from normal to congested serosa, accompanied by exudative infiltration.[21][9][20]

Appendicitis may be uncomplicated or complicated. Complicated appendicitis may occur with or without appendiceal perforation. Complicated nonperforated appendicitis includes the distinct histopathological categories of severe phlegmonous and gangrenous nonperforated appendicitis. The histopathological findings dictate the final diagnosis.

History and Physical

Acute appendicitis usually presents with generalized or periumbilical abdominal pain that eventually migrates to the right lower quadrant. While the time course of symptoms is variable, 75% of patients with acute appendicitis present within 24 hours of the onset of symptoms. However, acute appendicitis in the pregnant patient may present with milder, subtler symptoms, and pregnant patients are less likely to present with classic symptoms than age-matched controls, especially in late pregnancy.

The most common presenting symptom of acute appendicitis is abdominal pain. While the anatomical position of the root of the appendix is mostly constant, tail positions can vary, including retrocecal, subcecal, pre-ileal, post-ileal, and pelvic. In acute appendicitis, the initial inflammation stimulates the visceral afferent nerve fibers of T8 through T10, leading to vague midabdominal pain. The pain typically becomes more localized to the right lower quadrant as the inflamed adjacent parietal peritoneum is irritated. Not all patients with acute appendicitis present with migratory abdominal pain.

In classic presentations of acute appendicitis in the general population, abdominal pain may be accompanied by anorexia and nausea with or without vomiting. Fever occurs in 40% of patients and is a later sign.

However, many patients with acute appendicitis present with atypical symptoms, including malaise, heartburn, flatulence, constipation, and diarrhea.[22][17][23][24][25][26] If the tip of the appendix is pelvic, urinary urgency or frequency, dysuria, tenesmus, and diarrhea may be reported.[27][9][22][17][23][24][25][26]

Despite the elevation of the anterior abdominal wall by the gravid uterus, most pregnant patients with acute appendicitis will present with abdominal pain. Regardless of gestational age, this pain is most likely to occur in the right lower quadrant near the McBurney point, located one-third the distance between the anterior superior iliac spine and the umbilicus. However, as the location of the appendix may migrate cephalad with the enlarging uterus, pain may be described in the right flank or even in the right upper quadrant as pregnancy advances.[28][29][30][31][32][26][33][34][35]

The physical examination findings of acute appendicitis in the general population may be subtle, especially early in the disease process; this is also true for pregnant patients. As inflammation progresses, signs of peritoneal inflammation may develop. The most common physical examination findings in acute appendicitis in the pregnant and nonpregnant populations are right lower quadrant abdominal pain, rebound tenderness, and involuntary abdominal guarding. Pain due to retrocecal appendicitis will more likely be elicited with a vaginal or rectal examination, even during pregnancy. Pelvic appendicitis may cause pain below the McBurney point in pregnant and nonpregnant persons.[22][17][23][24][25][26][36]

Evaluation

Several auxiliary scoring systems have been developed to facilitate the prompt diagnosis of acute appendicitis. These scoring systems are mainly based on medical history, physical examination findings, laboratory testing, and imaging measures, including abdominal ultrasonography. The Alvarado score was developed in 1986 and is the most widely used system in current clinical practice. There is evidence to suggest that the Alvarado score is efficacious in pregnant patients.[37]

Laboratory Testing in Acute Appendicitis in Nonpregnant Persons

The total leucocyte count, neutrophil percentage, and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration are commonly utilized laboratory studies in evaluating patients with suspected acute appendicitis.[38] 

A leukocytosis with or without a left shift or bandemia is present in two-thirds of patients with acute appendicitis. A white blood cell (WBC) count of >10,000 cells/mm3 is highly predictive in patients with acute appendicitis. The CRP may be elevated. A combination of normal WBC and CRP results has a high negative predictive value for acute appendicitis.

The WBC and CRP results have a positive predictive value to differentiate between uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis.[39]  Increasing WBC and CRP values significantly increase the likelihood of complicated appendicitis. A WBC count ≥17,000 cells/mm3 is associated with complicated acute appendicitis.[9]

Microscopic hematuria and pyuria may occur when the inflamed appendix is close to the bladder or ureter. Still, these findings are not specific and are generally reported in less than 20% of patients.[40] 

Laboratory Testing in Acute Appendicitis in Pregnant Persons

Leukocytosis as high as 16,900 cells/mm3 may be a normal finding in pregnancy, particularly in the third trimester. The count may rise as high as 29,000 cells/mm3 during labor, with a slight neutrophilic predominance.[41][42][43][44][45][46] Therefore, leukocytosis is an unreliable indicator in the workup of appendicitis in pregnant persons.

Mild elevations in serum bilirubin have been described as a marker for appendiceal perforation with 70% sensitivity and 86% specificity. However, clinicians should not use this isolated finding as a diagnostic tool.[47] Some studies evaluated the use of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in the diagnostic course of acute appendicitis during pregnancy, and the results were suggestive of increased accuracy in this group of patients.[48]

Imaging Studies

Acute appendicitis is a clinical diagnosis confirmed by histopathological findings. However, imaging modalities are frequently utilized when the clinical diagnosis is uncertain. Commonly used modalities are graded compression ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Ultrasound is less sensitive and specific than CT but avoids ionizing radiation in children and pregnant women. MRI may also be useful for pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis and an indeterminate ultrasound.[9] Due to the increased risks of negative appendectomies in pregnancy, imaging is recommended for all pregnant patients with suspected acute appendicitis to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Ultrasonography 

Abdominal ultrasonography is a widely used and available primary measure to evaluate patients with acute abdominal pain. A specific compressibility index along with a diameter of less than 5 mm is used to exclude appendicitis. Ultrasonographic findings suggestive of acute appendicitis include an anteroposterior appendiceal diameter of >6 mm, the presence of an appendicolith, and abnormally increased echogenicity of the periappendiceal fat. The major concerns with using abdominal ultrasonography to evaluate the potential diagnosis of acute appendicitis are the innate limitations of ultrasonography in patients with obesity and the operator-dependency to find the suggestive features. Moreover, patients with peritonitis would hardly tolerate the graded compression.[49][9]

In pregnant patients with suspected acute appendicitis, the initial study of choice is ultrasound with graded compression of the right lower quadrant starting at the point of maximal tenderness and scanning between the border of the pelvis, iliac artery, and psoas muscle. The ultrasonographic findings consistent with acute appendicitis are the same in pregnant and nonpregnant persons.[50][51] Ultrasonography is safe in pregnancy and offers information on fetal well-being and obstetrical causes of acute abdominal pain, such as placental abruption. However, ultrasonography is a user-dependent tool, and the gravid uterus will reduce ultrasound sensitivity and specificity for acute appendicitis.[50]

Computed Tomography

An abdominopelvic CT scan has greater than 95% accuracy for diagnosing acute appendicitis. 

CT criteria for appendicitis include an enlarged appendix, appendiceal wall thickening, periappendiceal fat stranding, appendiceal wall enhancement, the appearance of inflamed soft tissue at the appendiceal base separating the appendix from the cecum, and the presence of appendicolith.[52][9] In most cases of appendicitis, observing intraluminal air or the contrast media due to luminal distention is uncommon. Non-visualization of the appendix does not rule out appendicitis. 

The major concern with obtaining an abdominopelvic CT scan is radiation exposure; however, the average exposure with a typical CT would not exceed 4 mSv, slightly above the background exposure of almost 3 mSv. Modifications of this protocol result in exposure well below the doses known to potentially cause adverse fetal effects. However, the use of abdominopelvic CT in evaluating pregnant patients with suspected acute appendicitis is reserved for circumstances in which ultrasonography is inconclusive and MRI is unavailable.[53][54][55][9][50][56][40][57]

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abdominopelvic MRI is highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. However, due to costs and accessibility, its indications are mainly limited to groups of patients with an embedded risk of radiation exposure, including pregnant women.

MRI demonstrates exceptional sensitivity of 91.8 % and specificity of 97.9% for diagnosing acute appendicitis in clinically symptomatic pregnant individuals. MRI may also be useful for pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis and an indeterminate ultrasound.[58]

MRI protocols may differ significantly; most encompass imaging in three planes using a swiftly acquired sequence featuring T2 weighting, and a subset incorporate T2 fat-suppressed imaging. MRI findings parallel those observed in alternative modalities, encompassing luminal distension and dilation, wall thickening, and periappendiceal free fluid.[58][9]

Routine use of MRI in pregnant patients reduces the negative appendectomy rate by almost 50% and does not increase the perforation rate. MRI has performed relatively well in a few limited retrospective studies ranging from 97 to 100% sensitivity.[59][60] When available, the liberal use of MRI in pregnant patients suspected to have acute appendicitis is recommended for these reasons. When MRI is unavailable or available only on a limited basis, the decision about any delay in appendectomy to obtain an MRI study requires all available clinical and imaging information, as the potential consequences of both negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation are severe.[50]

Treatment / Management

Surgical Treatment of Acute Appendicitis Without Perforation

Usually, the curative treatment of acute appendicitis is appendectomy. Perioperative antibiotic treatment should cover Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (usually with second-generation cephalosporin) and anaerobes (clindamycin or metronidazole). Delaying surgical intervention for more than 24 hours after symptoms appear increases the perforation risk.[61][62][63](B2)

The two mainstream approaches for appendectomy are laparoscopic and open techniques. No randomized trials have been performed to suggest that one technique is better than another; therefore, the choice of technique should be based on the clinical status and preferences of the patient, the gestational age and the size of the gravid uterus, and the surgeon's experience level. However, current guidelines state that laparoscopic appendectomy is the standard of care in pregnant patients as it is safe, allows easier identification of the variable location of the appendix, and offers an opportunity to evaluate the abdomen for any associated pathologic processes.[64] 

Despite this, multiple systematic reviews comparing laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy have indicated a slightly higher potential for fetal loss among pregnant patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.[65][66] However, laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis significantly decreases the time spent in surgery and the duration of hospitalization. Additionally, both the open and laparoscopic appendectomy groups showed comparable obstetric outcomes. These findings strongly support the effectiveness of the laparoscopic approach in treating acute appendicitis during pregnancy.[14](A1)

Some of the recommended modifications for the laparoscopic technique include a slight left-lateral positioning of patients after 20 weeks estimated gestational age, the use of an open-access approach for initial trocar placement to avoid injury to the gravid uterus, limiting intraabdominal insufflation pressure to less than 12 mmHg, and adjustment of port position for fundal height.[67][68] (B3)

When performing an open appendectomy in a pregnant patient, a transverse incision is made at the point of maximal tenderness and not necessarily at the McBurney point.[29][30] When the diagnosis is less certain, a lower midline vertical incision may be a possible option since it allows exposure of the abdomen to diagnose and treat other surgical conditions that mimic appendicitis. (B2)

Nonsurgical management of acute appendicitis using antibiotic therapy has been associated with a higher likelihood of negative outcomes in pregnant individuals. Therefore, appendectomy remains the established and preferred treatment for acute appendicitis during pregnancy.[69][70](B3)

Treatment of Complicated Acute Appendicitis with Perforation

If an appendiceal perforation is present, the management will depend on the nature of the perforation. A free perforation that causes the dissemination of pus and fecal material into the peritoneal cavity will likely result in a very ill and potentially septic patient with an increased risk of preterm labor, delivery, and fetal loss. These patients require urgent laparotomy for appendectomy with irrigation and drainage of the peritoneal cavity.[71][72](B2)

Nonpregnant patients with long-standing symptoms of more than five days suggestive of a contained perforation are usually managed with antibiotics, intravenous fluids, and bowel rest. Immediate surgery in this group of patients correlates with increased morbidity due to adhesions and inflammation and unavoidable injury to the adjacent structures. There may be the development of serious postoperative complications, such as abscesses or enterocutaneous fistulae, requiring reoperation for more extensive resections and the need for colostomies. 

The evidence regarding the management of a contained appendiceal perforation in pregnant patients is sparse.[73] It is advisable to proceed cautiously and monitor these patients in the hospital to avoid sepsis, preterm labor, or fetal loss. Information regarding interventional drainage of appendiceal abscesses in pregnant patients is not available.(B3)

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis of suspected acute appendicitis during pregnancy includes disorders typically considered in nonpregnant individuals. Therefore the clinician should consider cecal diverticulitis, Meckel diverticulitis, acute ileitis, inflammatory bowel disease, renal colic, and urinary tract infections. Gynecological conditions in the differential diagnosis include tubo-ovarian abscess, pelvic inflammatory disease, ruptured ovarian cyst, and adnexal torsion. 

Perhaps more importantly, pregnancy-related causes of lower abdominal pain, fever, leukocytosis, nausea and vomiting, and changes in bowel function need to be considered, such as placental abruption, uterine rupture, preeclampsia, and HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver function tests, low platelets) syndrome. During early pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy requires exclusion. Round ligament syndrome as a cause of right lower quadrant pain during periods of rapid uterine growth must be considered.

Surgical Oncology

Appendiceal malignancies are rare, with 1.2 cases per 100,000 in the United States. The average age at presentation is 50 to 55 years; however, appendiceal neoplasms can occur during the reproductive years. Approximately 30% of appendiceal malignancies present acutely. The most common appendiceal malignancies are gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), goblet cell carcinoma, colonic-type adenocarcinoma, and mucinous neoplasms.[74] 

Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs)

(GEP-NETs) are the most common histopathological subtypes of appendiceal malignancies. They rarely metastasize to the liver or lymph nodes; in patients with suspicious GEP-NETs, further evaluation of the liver and the ileocolic lymph node basin is essential. The primary tumor size dictates the surgical evaluation.

Goblet Cell Carcinoma

Goblet cell carcinomas are ubiquitous in appendiceal malignancies, sharing the diagnostic features of both appendiceal adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors. A comprehensive peritoneal evaluation with further peritoneal cancer index score documentation should be undertaken.[75]

Lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), and its subtypes, including mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas, might initially present with acute appendicitis. The surgical management of this extremely uncommon appendiceal malignancy is limited to a simple appendectomy. However, a comprehensive systemic evaluation should be included to exclude any potential metastatic site.[76]

Adenocarcinoma

Adenocarcinoma of the appendix, a rare appendiceal neoplasm with three histopathological subtypes, most commonly presents with acute appendicitis. The standard treatment is performing a right hemicolectomy, irrespective of the tumor size and or the involvement of the lymph node basin.[77]

Mucocele and Mucinous Neoplasm

Appendiceal mucocele, which might result from a benign or malignant spectrum of mucosal hyperplasia and various cystic formations, might present with acute appendicitis. Several pre-operative radiological features, including a well-encapsulated cystic structure in the right lower quadrant, suggest an appendiceal mucocele; however, a definitive diagnosis requires intraoperative evaluation and histopathological reports.

The preferred surgical management is an appendectomy with extraordinary cautionary measures to prevent capsular rupture. A comprehensive peritoneal evaluation with further peritoneal cancer index score documentation should be undertaken. Patient selection for the laparoscopic approach in managing appendiceal mucocele is critical and is limited to those with radiologic features suggestive of a homogenous cyst.[78]

Prognosis

Appendectomy is a relatively safe surgical procedure. In a global observational study of the general population, the overall mortality rate for appendicitis was 0.28%.[79] The following factors are associated with increased mortality rates in appendicitis in the general population: age greater than 80 years, immunosuppression, severe cardiovascular disease or the presence of other comorbidities, previous episodes of suspected appendicitis, and prior antimicrobial therapy. If acute appendicitis is diagnosed and definitively treated early in the disease, recovery is expected within 24 to 48 hours. However, patients with advanced abscesses, peritonitis, or sepsis may have a more prolonged and complicated course, possibly requiring additional surgery.

The long-term prognosis for pregnant patients undergoing appendectomy is generally good. Preexisting morbidities, not the surgery itself, are the greater risk factors for postoperative adverse obstetric events.[80][81] Maternal morbidity and mortality following appendectomy are low and comparable to nonpregnant patients.[82]

Complications

The complications of appendectomy in pregnancy include risks to the pregnancy, fetus, and gravida. Bleeding, postoperative infection, intraperitoneal abscess formation, injury to surrounding tissues, pain, and scarring are all known risks of appendectomy. However, untreated appendicitis carries a significant risk of appendiceal perforation. Free perforations can disseminate purulent and feculent material into the peritoneal cavity, increasing the risk of preterm labor, preterm delivery, and fetal loss.

The risk of fetal loss during uncomplicated appendectomies is 2%; however, in the presence of generalized peritonitis and peritoneal abscess, the fetal loss may increase to 6%.[72] In the presence of free appendiceal perforation, the risk of fetal loss may rise to 36%.[71] The incidence of preterm labor due to appendectomy is 4% and rises to 11% in cases of complicated appendicitis. The association between negative appendectomy to preterm labor and fetal loss is 10% and 4%, respectively.[72]

Promptly diagnosing and managing acute appendicitis in pregnancy significantly reduces the morbidity and mortality rates for both gravida and fetus.

Consultations

Any suspected case of acute appendicitis in pregnancy requires an obstetrical consultation to rule out obstetric and gynecological causes of pain as well as to establish the well-being of the fetus before, during, and after anesthesia.

Deterrence and Patient Education

Acute appendicitis is a common disease process during the reproductive years and is the most common nonobstetric surgical diagnosis during pregnancy. 

The risks of appendectomy during pregnancy are low for both the gravida and fetus. However, appendiceal perforation, particularly free perforation, carries significant morbidity and mortality for both the gravida and the fetus. The risk of appendiceal rupture is variable but is about 2% at 36 hours after the onset of symptoms and increases by approximately 5% every 12 hours after that.

Pregnant patients should be counseled to seek medical care if they develop persistent abdominal pain during their pregnancy, particularly if the pain is accompanied by anorexia, nausea, vomiting, or fever.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Acute appendicitis during pregnancy poses a diagnostic conundrum. These patients may exhibit nonspecific signs and symptoms such as vomiting, nausea, and leukocytosis. The cause of acute abdominal pain may be due to various diagnoses, including gynecological, obstetrical, gastrointestinal, urological, metabolic, and vascular etiologies. While the physical examination may reveal a surgical abdomen, the underlying etiology may be challenging to discern.

When caring for pregnant patients with acute appendicitis, a collaborative and coordinated approach involving physicians or advanced practice providers, nurses, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals is crucial to ensure patient-centered care, improve outcomes and enhance safety for both the gravida and the fetus, and optimize team performance. 

Physicians and advanced practice providers should possess knowledge and expertise of the unique anatomical and physiological changes during pregnancy that can affect the diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. The timely diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis in pregnancy are crucial to minimizing risk to the gravida and fetus. An obstetrical care provider and a general surgeon must collaborate to develop a tailored treatment plan that incorporates the stage of pregnancy, the severity of appendicitis, and the potential impact on maternal and fetal well-being. In cases where evidence is not definitive or minimal, expert opinion from the specialist may be utilized to recommend the type of imaging or treatment.[64] [Level 1]

The anesthesia team must be consulted to determine the best technical anesthetic approach for whatever intervention is chosen, accounting for the stage of pregnancy and patient preferences.

The clinical nursing staff plays a vital role in conducting thorough assessments in the perioperative period, monitoring vital signs, and evaluating fetal well-being, including during the surgical procedure. The clinical nursing staff also educates patients about self-care, pain management, and postoperative recovery. The clinical pharmacy staff also plays a significant role in managing acute appendicitis in pregnancy by assisting the interprofessional team with developing a medication regimen compatible with pregnancy.

By leveraging their skills, adopting a patient-centered approach, promoting interprofessional communication, and coordinating care effectively, healthcare professionals can enhance patient outcomes, safety, and satisfaction when caring for pregnant patients with acute appendicitis. Continuous education, evidence-based practice, and a focus on delivering holistic and individualized care contribute to a successful team approach. [Level 5]

References


[1]

Vaos G, Dimopoulou A, Gkioka E, Zavras N. Immediate surgery or conservative treatment for complicated acute appendicitis in children? A meta-analysis. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2019 Jul:54(7):1365-1371. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Jul 27     [PubMed PMID: 30115448]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[2]

Gignoux B, Blanchet MC, Lanz T, Vulliez A, Saffarini M, Bothorel H, Robert M, Frering V. Should ambulatory appendectomy become the standard treatment for acute appendicitis? World journal of emergency surgery : WJES. 2018:13():28. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0191-4. Epub 2018 Jun 28     [PubMed PMID: 29988464]


[3]

Eng KA, Abadeh A, Ligocki C, Lee YK, Moineddin R, Adams-Webber T, Schuh S, Doria AS. Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of US, CT, and MRI as Second-Line Imaging Tests after an Initial US. Radiology. 2018 Sep:288(3):717-727. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180318. Epub 2018 Jun 19     [PubMed PMID: 29916776]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[4]

Kartal İ. Childhood neuroendocrine tumors of the digestive system: A single center experience. Medicine. 2022 Feb 11:101(6):e28795. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028795. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 35147110]


[5]

Choi YS, Seo JH, Yi JW, Choe YM, Heo YS, Choi SK. Clinical Characteristics of Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy: 10-Year Experience at a Single Institution in South Korea. Journal of clinical medicine. 2023 May 4:12(9):. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093277. Epub 2023 May 4     [PubMed PMID: 37176716]


[6]

Brown JJ, Wilson C, Coleman S, Joypaul BV. Appendicitis in pregnancy: an ongoing diagnostic dilemma. Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. 2009 Feb:11(2):116-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01594.x. Epub 2008 May 23     [PubMed PMID: 18513191]


[7]

Narula N, Gibbs KE, Kong F, Mukherjee I. Appendiceal Intussusception, Diverticula, and Fecalith Associated With Appendicitis. The American surgeon. 2022 Sep 8:():31348221126954. doi: 10.1177/00031348221126954. Epub 2022 Sep 8     [PubMed PMID: 36074037]


[8]

Bhangu A, Søreide K, Di Saverio S, Assarsson JH, Drake FT. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet (London, England). 2015 Sep 26:386(10000):1278-1287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00275-5. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 26460662]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[9]

Jones MW, Lopez RA, Deppen JG. Appendicitis. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 29630245]


[10]

Han YW. Fusobacterium nucleatum: a commensal-turned pathogen. Current opinion in microbiology. 2015 Feb:23():141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2014.11.013. Epub 2015 Jan 8     [PubMed PMID: 25576662]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[11]

Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V. Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993-2008. The Journal of surgical research. 2012 Jun 15:175(2):185-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.07.017. Epub 2011 Aug 9     [PubMed PMID: 22099604]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[12]

Sahm M, Koch A, Schmidt U, Wolff S, Pross M, Gastinger I, Lippert H. [Acute appendicitis - clinical health-service research on the current surgical therapy]. Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie. 2013 Jun:138(3):270-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1283947. Epub 2012 Mar 16     [PubMed PMID: 22426968]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[13]

Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. American journal of epidemiology. 1990 Nov:132(5):910-25     [PubMed PMID: 2239906]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[14]

Lipping E, Saar S, Rull K, Tark A, Tiiman M, Jaanimäe L, Lepner U, Talving P. Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a population-based study. Surgical endoscopy. 2023 Aug:37(8):6025-6031. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10075-0. Epub 2023 Apr 26     [PubMed PMID: 37099158]


[15]

Andersson RE, Lambe M. Incidence of appendicitis during pregnancy. International journal of epidemiology. 2001 Dec:30(6):1281-5     [PubMed PMID: 11821329]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[16]

Zingone F, Sultan AA, Humes DJ, West J. Risk of acute appendicitis in and around pregnancy: a population-based cohort study from England. Annals of surgery. 2015 Feb:261(2):332-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000780. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24950289]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[17]

Prystowsky JB, Pugh CM, Nagle AP. Current problems in surgery. Appendicitis. Current problems in surgery. 2005 Oct:42(10):688-742     [PubMed PMID: 16198668]


[18]

Hamilton AL, Kamm MA, Ng SC, Morrison M. Proteus spp. as Putative Gastrointestinal Pathogens. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2018 Jul:31(3):. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00085-17. Epub 2018 Jun 13     [PubMed PMID: 29899011]


[19]

Redden M, Ghadiri M. Acute appendicitis with associated trichobezoar of feline hair. Journal of surgical case reports. 2022 Mar:2022(3):rjac133. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjac133. Epub 2022 Mar 29     [PubMed PMID: 35355580]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[20]

Hoffmann JC, Trimborn CP, Hoffmann M, Schröder R, Förster S, Dirks K, Tannapfel A, Anthuber M, Hollerweger A. Classification of acute appendicitis (CAA): treatment directed new classification based on imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography) and pathology. International journal of colorectal disease. 2021 Nov:36(11):2347-2360. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03940-8. Epub 2021 Jun 18     [PubMed PMID: 34143276]


[21]

Correa J, Jimeno J, Vallverdu H, Bizzoca C, Collado-Roura F, Estalella L, Hermoso J, Silva N, Sanchez-Pradell C, Parés D. Correlation between intraoperative surgical diagnosis of complicated acute appendicitis and the pathology report: clinical implications. Surgical infections. 2015 Feb:16(1):41-4. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.155. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25761079]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[22]

Wray CJ, Kao LS, Millas SG, Tsao K, Ko TC. Acute appendicitis: controversies in diagnosis and management. Current problems in surgery. 2013 Feb:50(2):54-86. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2012.10.001. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 23374326]


[23]

Lee SL, Walsh AJ, Ho HS. Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960). 2001 May:136(5):556-62     [PubMed PMID: 11343547]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[24]

Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology. 2000 May:215(2):337-48     [PubMed PMID: 10796905]


[25]

Chung CH, Ng CP, Lai KK. Delays by patients, emergency physicians, and surgeons in the management of acute appendicitis: retrospective study. Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi. 2000 Sep:6(3):254-9     [PubMed PMID: 11025842]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[26]

House JB, Bourne CL, Seymour HM, Brewer KL. Location of the appendix in the gravid patient. The Journal of emergency medicine. 2014 May:46(5):741-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.09.033. Epub 2014 Jan 29     [PubMed PMID: 24484624]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[27]

Snyder MJ, Guthrie M, Cagle S. Acute Appendicitis: Efficient Diagnosis and Management. American family physician. 2018 Jul 1:98(1):25-33     [PubMed PMID: 30215950]


[28]

Mourad J, Elliott JP, Erickson L, Lisboa L. Appendicitis in pregnancy: new information that contradicts long-held clinical beliefs. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2000 May:182(5):1027-9     [PubMed PMID: 10819817]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[29]

Hodjati H, Kazerooni T. Location of the appendix in the gravid patient: a re-evaluation of the established concept. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2003 Jun:81(3):245-7     [PubMed PMID: 12767564]


[30]

Popkin CA, Lopez PP, Cohn SM, Brown M, Lynn M. The incision of choice for pregnant women with appendicitis is through McBurney's point. American journal of surgery. 2002 Jan:183(1):20-2     [PubMed PMID: 11869697]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[31]

Oto A, Srinivasan PN, Ernst RD, Koroglu M, Cesani F, Nishino T, Chaljub G. Revisiting MRI for appendix location during pregnancy. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2006 Mar:186(3):883-7     [PubMed PMID: 16498125]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[32]

Pates JA, Avendiano TC, Zaretsky MV, McIntire DD, Twickler DM. The appendix in pregnancy: confirming historical observations with a contemporary modality. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2009 Oct:114(4):805-808. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b6f6cc. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 19888038]


[33]

Cunningham FG, McCubbin JH. Appendicitis complicating pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1975 Apr:45(4):415-20     [PubMed PMID: 1121371]


[34]

McGee TM. Acute appendicitis in pregnancy. The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology. 1989 Nov:29(4):378-85     [PubMed PMID: 2698614]


[35]

Sivanesaratnam V. The acute abdomen and the obstetrician. Bailliere's best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 2000 Feb:14(1):89-102     [PubMed PMID: 10789262]


[36]

van Aerts RMM, van de Laarschot LFM, Banales JM, Drenth JPH. Clinical management of polycystic liver disease. Journal of hepatology. 2018 Apr:68(4):827-837. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.024. Epub 2017 Nov 24     [PubMed PMID: 29175241]


[37]

Awayshih MMA, Nofal MN, Yousef AJ. Evaluation of Alvarado score in diagnosing acute appendicitis. The Pan African medical journal. 2019:34():15. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.34.15.17803. Epub 2019 Sep 6     [PubMed PMID: 31762884]


[38]

Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, Chen WK, Jeng LB, Chen RJ. Laboratory tests in patients with acute appendicitis. ANZ journal of surgery. 2006 Jan-Feb:76(1-2):71-4     [PubMed PMID: 16483301]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[39]

Withers AS, Grieve A, Loveland JA. Correlation of white cell count and CRP in acute appendicitis in paediatric patients. South African journal of surgery. Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir chirurgie. 2019 Dec:57(4):40     [PubMed PMID: 31773931]


[40]

Bailey LE, Finley RK Jr, Miller SF, Jones LM. Acute appendicitis during pregnancy. The American surgeon. 1986 Apr:52(4):218-21     [PubMed PMID: 3954275]


[41]

Mahmoodian S. Appendicitis complicating pregnancy. Southern medical journal. 1992 Jan:85(1):19-24     [PubMed PMID: 1734528]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[42]

Coleman C, Thompson JE Jr, Bennion RS, Schmit PJ. White blood cell count is a poor predictor of severity of disease in the diagnosis of appendicitis. The American surgeon. 1998 Oct:64(10):983-5     [PubMed PMID: 9764707]


[43]

Tehrani HY, Petros JG, Kumar RR, Chu Q. Markers of severe appendicitis. The American surgeon. 1999 May:65(5):453-5     [PubMed PMID: 10231216]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[44]

Thompson MM, Underwood MJ, Dookeran KA, Lloyd DM, Bell PR. Role of sequential leucocyte counts and C-reactive protein measurements in acute appendicitis. The British journal of surgery. 1992 Aug:79(8):822-4     [PubMed PMID: 1393485]


[45]

Lurie S, Rahamim E, Piper I, Golan A, Sadan O. Total and differential leukocyte counts percentiles in normal pregnancy. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2008 Jan:136(1):16-9     [PubMed PMID: 17275981]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[46]

KUVIN SF, BRECHER G. Differential neutrophil counts in pregnancy. The New England journal of medicine. 1962 Apr 26:266():877-8     [PubMed PMID: 14460983]


[47]

Sand M, Bechara FG, Holland-Letz T, Sand D, Mehnert G, Mann B. Diagnostic value of hyperbilirubinemia as a predictive factor for appendiceal perforation in acute appendicitis. American journal of surgery. 2009 Aug:198(2):193-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.08.026. Epub 2009 Mar 23     [PubMed PMID: 19306980]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[48]

Yazar FM, Bakacak M, Emre A, Urfalıoglu A, Serin S, Cengiz E, Bülbüloglu E. Predictive role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios for diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy. The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences. 2015 Nov:31(11):591-6. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 18     [PubMed PMID: 26678940]


[49]

Hwang ME. Sonography and Computed Tomography in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis. Radiologic technology. 2018 Jan:89(3):224-237     [PubMed PMID: 29298941]


[50]

Khandelwal A, Fasih N, Kielar A. Imaging of acute abdomen in pregnancy. Radiologic clinics of North America. 2013 Nov:51(6):1005-22. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2013.07.007. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24210441]


[51]

Parks NA, Schroeppel TJ. Update on imaging for acute appendicitis. The Surgical clinics of North America. 2011 Feb:91(1):141-54. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2010.10.017. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 21184905]


[52]

Rao PM. Cecal apical changes with appendicitis: diagnosing appendicitis when the appendix is borderline abnormal or not seen. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 1999 Jan-Feb:23(1):55-9     [PubMed PMID: 10050808]


[53]

Pooler BD, Repplinger MD, Reeder SB, Pickhardt PJ. MRI of the Nontraumatic Acute Abdomen: Description of Findings and Multimodality Correlation. Gastroenterology clinics of North America. 2018 Sep:47(3):667-690. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Jul 7     [PubMed PMID: 30115443]


[54]

Swenson DW, Ayyala RS, Sams C, Lee EY. Practical Imaging Strategies for Acute Appendicitis in Children. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2018 Oct:211(4):901-909. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19778. Epub 2018 Aug 14     [PubMed PMID: 30106612]


[55]

Kim DW, Suh CH, Yoon HM, Kim JR, Jung AY, Lee JS, Cho YA. Visibility of Normal Appendix on CT, MRI, and Sonography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2018 Sep:211(3):W140-W150. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.19321. Epub 2018 Jul 24     [PubMed PMID: 30040469]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[56]

Ames Castro M, Shipp TD, Castro EE, Ouzounian J, Rao P. The use of helical computed tomography in pregnancy for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2001 Apr:184(5):954-7     [PubMed PMID: 11303204]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[57]

Lazarus E, Mayo-Smith WW, Mainiero MB, Spencer PK. CT in the evaluation of nontraumatic abdominal pain in pregnant women. Radiology. 2007 Sep:244(3):784-90     [PubMed PMID: 17709829]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[58]

Kave M, Parooie F, Salarzaei M. Pregnancy and appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical use of MRI in diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnant women. World journal of emergency surgery : WJES. 2019:14():37. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0254-1. Epub 2019 Jul 22     [PubMed PMID: 31367227]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[59]

Kereshi B, Lee KS, Siewert B, Mortele KJ. Clinical utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of pregnant females with suspected acute appendicitis. Abdominal radiology (New York). 2018 Jun:43(6):1446-1455. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1300-7. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28849364]


[60]

Kearl YL, Claudius I, Behar S, Cooper J, Dollbaum R, Hardasmalani M, Hardiman K, Rose E, Santillanes G, Berdahl C. Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound for Appendicitis in Diagnostic and Nondiagnostic Studies. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2016 Feb:23(2):179-85. doi: 10.1111/acem.12873. Epub 2016 Jan 14     [PubMed PMID: 26765503]


[61]

Bickell NA, Aufses AH Jr, Rojas M, Bodian C. How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2006 Mar:202(3):401-6     [PubMed PMID: 16500243]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[62]

Yilmaz HG, Akgun Y, Bac B, Celik Y. Acute appendicitis in pregnancy--risk factors associated with principal outcomes: a case control study. International journal of surgery (London, England). 2007 Jun:5(3):192-7     [PubMed PMID: 17509502]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[63]

Chen CY, Chen YC, Pu HN, Tsai CH, Chen WT, Lin CH. Bacteriology of acute appendicitis and its implication for the use of prophylactic antibiotics. Surgical infections. 2012 Dec:13(6):383-90. doi: 10.1089/sur.2011.135. Epub 2012 Dec 11     [PubMed PMID: 23231389]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[64]

Korndorffer JR Jr, Fellinger E, Reed W. SAGES guideline for laparoscopic appendectomy. Surgical endoscopy. 2010 Apr:24(4):757-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0632-y. Epub 2009 Sep 29     [PubMed PMID: 19787402]


[65]

Augustin G, Boric M, Barcot O, Puljak L. Discordant outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy in published meta-analyses: an overview of systematic reviews. Surgical endoscopy. 2020 Oct:34(10):4245-4256. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07674-6. Epub 2020 Jun 16     [PubMed PMID: 32556754]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[66]

Walker HG, Al Samaraee A, Mills SJ, Kalbassi MR. Laparoscopic appendicectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review of the published evidence. International journal of surgery (London, England). 2014 Nov:12(11):1235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.406. Epub 2014 Sep 9     [PubMed PMID: 25219891]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[67]

Al-Fozan H, Tulandi T. Safety and risks of laparoscopy in pregnancy. Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology. 2002 Aug:14(4):375-9     [PubMed PMID: 12151826]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[68]

Guidelines Committee of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, Yumi H. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy: this statement was reviewed and approved by the Board of Governors of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), September 2007. It was prepared by the SAGES Guidelines Committee. Surgical endoscopy. 2008 Apr:22(4):849-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9758-6. Epub 2008 Feb 21     [PubMed PMID: 18288533]


[69]

Abbasi N, Patenaude V, Abenhaim HA. Management and outcomes of acute appendicitis in pregnancy-population-based study of over 7000 cases. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2014 Nov:121(12):1509-14. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12736. Epub 2014 Mar 28     [PubMed PMID: 24674238]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[70]

Cheng V, Ashbrook M, Youssefzadeh AC, Kohrman N, Matsuo K, Inaba K, Matsushima K. Management for Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis During Pregnancy: National Trends and Patient Outcomes. Annals of surgery. 2023 Dec 1:278(6):932-936. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005893. Epub 2023 May 3     [PubMed PMID: 37132381]


[71]

Babaknia A, Parsa H, Woodruff JD. Appendicitis during pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1977 Jul:50(1):40-4     [PubMed PMID: 876520]


[72]

McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Tillou A, Hiatt JR, Ko CY, Cryer HM. Negative appendectomy in pregnant women is associated with a substantial risk of fetal loss. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2007 Oct:205(4):534-40     [PubMed PMID: 17903726]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[73]

Vasireddy A, Atkinson S, Shennan A, Bewley S. Surgical management of appendicitis remains best option during pregnancy. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2012 May 22:344():e3575. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3575. Epub 2012 May 22     [PubMed PMID: 22619205]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[74]

Van de Moortele M, De Hertogh G, Sagaert X, Van Cutsem E. Appendiceal cancer : a review of the literature. Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica. 2020 Jul-Sep:83(3):441-448     [PubMed PMID: 33094592]


[75]

Zhang K, Meyerson C, Kassardjian A, Westbrook LM, Zheng W, Wang HL. Goblet Cell Carcinoid/Carcinoma: An Update. Advances in anatomic pathology. 2019 Mar:26(2):75-83. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000222. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30601149]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[76]

Marte A, Sabatino MD, Cautiero P, Accardo M, Romano M, Parmeggiani P. Unexpected finding of laparoscopic appendectomy: appendix MALT lymphoma in children. Pediatric surgery international. 2008 Apr:24(4):471-3     [PubMed PMID: 17628810]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[77]

Xie X, Zhou Z, Song Y, Li W, Diao D, Dang C, Zhang H. The Management and Prognostic Prediction of Adenocarcinoma of Appendix. Scientific reports. 2016 Dec 16:6():39027. doi: 10.1038/srep39027. Epub 2016 Dec 16     [PubMed PMID: 27982068]


[78]

Morano WF, Gleeson EM, Sullivan SH, Padmanaban V, Mapow BL, Shewokis PA, Esquivel J, Bowne WB. Clinicopathological Features and Management of Appendiceal Mucoceles: A Systematic Review. The American surgeon. 2018 Feb 1:84(2):273-281     [PubMed PMID: 29580358]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[79]

Calis H. Morbidity and Mortality in Appendicitis in the Elderly. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP. 2018 Nov:28(11):875-878. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2018.11.875. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30369383]


[80]

Choi JJ, Mustafa R, Lynn ET, Divino CM. Appendectomy during pregnancy: follow-up of progeny. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2011 Nov:213(5):627-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.07.016. Epub 2011 Aug 19     [PubMed PMID: 21856183]


[81]

Sachs A, Guglielminotti J, Miller R, Landau R, Smiley R, Li G. Risk Factors and Risk Stratification for Adverse Obstetrical Outcomes After Appendectomy or Cholecystectomy During Pregnancy. JAMA surgery. 2017 May 1:152(5):436-441. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5045. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28114513]


[82]

Silvestri MT, Pettker CM, Brousseau EC, Dick MA, Ciarleglio MM, Erekson EA. Morbidity of appendectomy and cholecystectomy in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2011 Dec:118(6):1261-1270. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318234d7bc. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22105255]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence